Why does it matter what the intent of the designer was? An angry person with a 2 ton projectile under his control can and do use it to kill people. To suggest that this young lady would be alive if he didn't have a gun is purely speculation.
Only people to bring up IC is people not named Buckshot24. I've been focused on mutation and selection, others have galloped all over the place to avoid that topic and tell useless stories about eyes.
Yeah, I don't think so. If he had no gun and was angry enough to shoot her then he was angry enough to ram her with the truck. The intent of the designers of the truck is 100% irrelevant.
I'm supposed to abandon my beliefs because some guy on the internet said something different? As with every living person with a brain, I am biased, I process information based on prior experience. I could be wrong about things but expecting me to just abandon it because you assert something...
He couldn't show me that and I would not deny that evidence. That would be very convincing evidence. Him telling fairy tales about eyes is not convincing and it shouldn't be to anybody.
I'm not interested in that topic. The POTUS doesn't personally pick what studies get funded as you dishonestly implied. It was a bad argument, accept it and move on.
Bowfinger, in case you haven't figured it out yet this is NOT my motto. "Bowfinger says it, I believe it, and that settles it." If I can't trust you on little things, like 10^60, then I sure as peaches am not going to trust you on other assertions you make.
You can't look at what this industry has become and complain about "basic supply and demand" because the system isn't running on free market principles.
I didn't see his post. No need for personal comments, I agree. Plus you people make great bread.
I hope you take this as a light hearted joke as it was intended.
I'd correct the grammar of somebody who called me a moron, for sure. I retract my comment on the subject.
No I didn't. There are correct things about it, it wouldn't survive otherwise. And no it didn't. Your story was a tautology. Assume the eyes evolved to show that they evolved.
You are on the list. The healthcare system as it stands is not a supply/demand type system. I've been advocating for MORE free market principles, not a perfectly free market. If you dump cash into the market it can't help but raise prices. If I buy things using your money I will act...
Michelson and Morley tried to measure the aether and couldn't detect it. A wrong idea was removed which lead to better ideas like relativity. You don't need a replacement to reject some scientific idea. I don't need a replacement to challenge your faith in mutation and selection as a creative...
When you say I support the killing of kids with cancer then you are saying I am doing something wrong. I'd like to know what you think society should do with people like me.
No. Have people purchase directly more of their health care and prices will come down. Right now there is no reason to seek to lower prices as a provider.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.