No, my friend, you are just so vested in your bullshit narrative that you’ve lost the forest for the trees, and your petulant response to anyone who challenges your narrative is just indicative that you lack a broader perspective.How do I live with myself knowing that dishonest pieces of shit like you exist? I stay positive and tell myself that for every idiot, such as yourself, that ignores facts and reality, another person realizes there is a lot of bullshit being spread by people like you and they start questioning and verifying things for themselves.
We’re talking about the political theater more so than Kavanaugh’s credentials. Feinstein didn’t land any zingers, but asked what I consider to be better and more relevant questions that don’t lend themselves to sound bytes.If anyone successfully lands punches, then yes, they will attract attention. The fact that everyone is talking about it says it found some success.
The resistance wants a fighter. Booker and Harris simply needed to demonstrate tenacity.if anyone really wants notches on their belt, they need to defeat the Kav nomination, and that was the primary mission.
She has yet to signal those ambitions.Hirono was in there too, but no one is talking about her for 2020
I think people view the exchange through confirmation bias. Harris quite effectively set down a well crafter perjury trap. I think her tenacity would cause anyone to trip, but Kavanaugh saw it for what it was and respectfully challenged her bluff. My opinion will not change unless she has evidence to share that supports her innuendos. A great punch is meaningless once blocked.It was actually a pretty complex attack packaged in a pretty simple question. No wonder Kav was tripping all over himself trying to figure out how to counter.
Because of Harry Reid opening the door and democrats blocking and obstructing.
Nope you guys would have Borked them both, so we did what Harry Reid did and changed the rules.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Bork
"obstruct (someone, especially a candidate for public office) through systematic defamation or vilification."
Damn shame your evil bullshit didn't work on the last 2 nominees.
That said, I'm looking forward to Kavanaugh's "bipartisan" approval.Same tired bullshit. Bork's rejection was a bipartisan effort with 6 GOP Senators voting against him.
Best thing you've said so far. Bipartisanship is only good when it flows in Republicans favor. I'm glad we can agree on something.Bipartisanship isn't always a good thing.
Best thing you've said so far. Bipartisanship is only good when it flows in Republicans favor. I'm glad we can agree on something.
And Kavanaugh will probably get 3 - 5 Democrat votes.Same tired bullshit. Bork's rejection was a bipartisan effort with 6 GOP Senators voting against him.
And breaking the law has consequences...
Some forms of birth control are abortion inducing drugs.
“Abortion pill” is the popular name for using two different medicines to end a pregnancy: mifepristone and misoprostol.
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/abortion/the-abortion-pill
That said, I'm looking forward to Kavanaugh's "bipartisan" approval.
Nuclear combat just means mutually assured destruction.We're in nuclear combat now.
If Rs wanted to extend an Olive Branch, they wouldn't have done what they did with Kavs documents and the last min dumps and classifications, let alone hold the nomination right before an election.
Ds are under no expectations to not respond in kind. It will broadcast weakness if they do.
You suck at logic. Just saying.Then you're also looking forward to King Trump, immune from subpoenas or prosecution as long as his toadies are running Congress.
Checks and balances indeed.
Good analytical article on CNN that really frames everything so far for what it is:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/07/poli...donald-trump-republicans-democrats/index.html
In summary:
Kavanaugh didn’t stumble in a way to lose support from fence sitting GOP Senators, and avoided the vague questions laid as landmines and perjury traps
More senior Senators like Feinstein did the actual heavy lifting in terms of asking questions that truly evaluate Kavanaugh as a candidate
Booker and Harris got their campaign slogan and video clips
Everyone seems to have forgotten the tone of bipartisanship that seemed to take center stage at McCain’s funeral.
It's when you lie under oath and get caught then blame others for it.I still don't know what a "perjury trap" is. Sounds like another one of those made-up expressions that is only used to signal morons, like "reverse racism."
Perjury traps are the primary method used to indict ham sandwiches.I still don't know what a "perjury trap" is. Sounds like another one of those made-up expressions that is only used to signal morons, like "reverse racism."
Perjury trap is self explanatory within the context of what Harris failed to do.I still don't know what a "perjury trap" is. Sounds like another one of those made-up expressions that is only used to signal morons, like "reverse racism."
Perjury trap is self explanatory within the context of what Harris failed to do.
She posed a question so loosely worded that any response could be used against Kavanaugh, accompanied by a bluff and innuendos of leverage. When pressed for clarification she double downed on a bluff.
Kavanaugh is not on trial. She is welcome to bring forward whatever incriminating evidence she thinks she has. Anything less is just theatrics.
I don’t think she has any cards to play. Aspirations perhaps. But no cards.
Nuclear combat just means mutually assured destruction.
I thought it was a very straight forward question. Ask me that question: the answer is no and I don't need 10 mins of stumbling over words to answer it.Huh?
"Have you ever spoken to anyone at the lawfirm of [Dilhole], [Smegma], [Schmuck], and [Johnson] about the Mueller investigation?"
Yes, very loosely worded, very confusing. So, so, so easy to be caught lying about that one! JFC man. The obvious answer, of course, would be: "Not to my recollection."
(Oh wait, then he'd be accused of sounding too much like that incompetent homo-murdering, weapon-selling asshole of a canonized POTUS that the republicans elected way back in '79.)
And Kavanaugh will probably get 3 - 5 Democrat votes.
We’re talking about the political theater more so than Kavanaugh’s credentials. Feinstein didn’t land any zingers, but asked what I consider to be better and more relevant questions that don’t lend themselves to sound bytes.
The resistance wants a fighter. Booker and Harris simply needed to demonstrate tenacity.
She has yet to signal those ambitions.
I think people view the exchange through confirmation bias. Harris quite effectively set down a well crafter perjury trap. I think her tenacity would cause anyone to trip, but Kavanaugh saw it for what it was and respectfully challenged her bluff. My opinion will not change unless she has evidence to share that supports her innuendos. A great punch is meaningless once blocked.
It's fucked up that you support trolling in our national political processes.I'm thinking Zina Bash is one of the greatest trolls of all time! This is too funny!
I'm thinking Zina Bash is one of the greatest trolls of all time! This is too funny!