Dear readers and my opponents here and atheists:
I want you my opponents to know that you are not my enemies, but only opponents, like as opponents in a sports game, okay?
The OP is the following:
"The need to concur on how to prove God exists or not."
The focus is on the word, how.
Now, you my opponents and atheists to all appearances are of the conviction that God does not exist, I on the contrary, that God exists.
By some kind of a crude analogy, you and I are like competing teams in a sports game, say, basketball: so we agree to observe the same rules in the performance of our respective physical skills, by which conduct we will both come to recognize which side, you or I, win in the game.
So, what do you say, dear my opponents and atheists?
Will you concur with me that the first 'rule' is we all you and I admit the fact that we are existing?
Dear readers, what is going to be the reactions of my opponents and atheists to this my present post?
So, my dear opponents and atheists, you do not deny that we all you and I, we are all existing.
The next 'rule' requires us all to accept the fact that we all came from our respective pairs of papa and mama.
What do you say to that?
It's a fact, so you cannot challenge it, consider that even the ancient Romans know about it, here is their legal axiom
Contra factum non est argumentum.*
Tell me, what do you think is the next now third 'rule'?
And we must concur on it, okay?
*Against the fact there is no argument.