I'm looking for something that has the same footprint as a SFF shuttle box, but that supports quad core and has at least 1 pcie 16x slot. i've seen the ones at fry's and online offered by shuttle, but i will be running linux on this and wanted to know if anybody here has experience with it...
you need to use addresses 0cfch and 0cf8h using "out" and "in" instructions to access pci config space registers. one acts as a data index and the other an address index to the config space settings. the address you are indexing depends on bus number, device, offset, etc... it's been a while...
any decent company offering internships should pay you. getting an internship or coop will most likely help you pay off school loans. the more you do, the more you can save. i paid off my entire last year of school through coops.
This is really dependent on the inherent architecture of the processor and core arrangement. Dual cpu's will be better if they are 2 opterons and the system layout is such that each cpu has memory behind it. In a NUMA aware OS running database applications where memory bandwidth was the...
theoretically if you had 2 logical processors and the OS scheduler had a process per logical proc than you would see them share the same cpu resources 50/50. let's assume that the processes use the same working set of code, just executing at different OS-level priorities.
one of the...
again, it really depends. there are a few phds where i work, and some are in positions that have nothing to do with their phds. keep in mind that if you do a phd you probably will want to get a job in that specialization, and since it's a niche market, it might be very hard to get exactly what...
if you're implying that i am talking about running gddr3/4 on the same package as the cpu die, read again. the ht->gddr bridge chip i was talking about is on the other socket. you are never going to interface a memory type to a non-memory specific bus (like HT, gtl+, pci...) without a bridge...
what a highly technical response.
when gddr is on the same package as the HT->gddr bridge chip i talked about, tracerouting being too long for gddr becomes irrelevant. simple enough?
gddr's bandwidth is in direct correlation with the bit width of the bus all of the memory modules are lined up in. you can have a 64, 128, or 256 bit bus if you wanted to, it all depends on how you want to arrange the memory modules to be used by the memory controller. gddr is just a type of...
what makes you say that? running ram at those speeds over that long of a bus has nothing to do with the feasibilty of the design. matching asynchronous clock domains is done in many designs all the time. most x86 cpu's have at least 2-3 clock domains, and almost all designs that i have worked...
it's not really a question of whether or not it can be done as it obviously can. but i doubt that it would be architecturally beneficial to the platform. to get an accurate assessment of what type of performance numbers to expect you really need to break this up into the different latency...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.