Maybe you are using the wrong M.2 because if you look back on that page for Aorus 7 if the third M2 is used with NVMe it will disable SATA ports.
(It is possible for an M2 on that X299 to disable SATA.....but just not on the first two M2 when a NVMe is installed.)
That is true.....but it is...
Here is a page from the Gigabyte Aorus X299 Gaming 7 manual:
https://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/X299-AORUS-Gaming-7-rev-10/support#support-manual
https://d2aw00qtgn0pb6.cloudfront.net/FileList/Manual/mb_manual_ga-x299-aorus-gaming-7_e.pdf
So no SATA ports affected by NVMe in...
The redundancy plus the fact they are using chiplets (via Foveros and EMIB) should let them make a relatively high amount of high end dGPGPUs.
Boosted cache size as well?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141933116000053
Using 16GB optane and a NVMe NAND SSD in M2_1 and M2_2 of a motherboard with supported chipset should result in four SATA ports. Example below:
(The above chart taken from page 33 of the MSI Z270 Gaming Pro Carbon Manual --->...
Maybe instead of increasing clockspeed further Intel will be able to bring the data closer to the CPU boosting IPC (as well as reduce the need for speculative execution....which improves security among other things.)
And then to go along with that there will also be very efficient transistors...
If 512 EU is 260mm2 then 1024 EU at 520 mm2?
And how many EUs could the GPU be if the cache, display/media and memory controllers were removed from the die and positioned underneath via Foveros?
Thank you for the information.
Do you happen to know how many chip enablers the new 12 channel controller has?
EDIT: Tom's is reporting 4 chip enablers per channel (which would work out to be 48 chip enablers*), but then they are also mentioning the new controller is more scalable than...
If the top die for 3rd Gen IMFT is indeed 96L 16nm 2048Gb 3D QLC (1536Gb 3D TLC) that means per GB parallelism would be lower than the 64L 20nm 1024Gb 3D QLC.
With the current 32TB Long ruler form factor SSD likely have two NAND dies per chip enabler for a write speed of 1800 MB/s.....does a...
Hypothetically by having Optane in front of NAND it would allow the NAND to be developed more for capacity rather than endurance.
Think Optane + 16nm 3D QLC vs. 20nm 3D QLC.
(Ideally the Optane would also write directly to QLC rather first to SLC NAND. This would reduce power consumption and...
Laptops at Best Buy with Optane H10:
https://www.bestbuy.com/site/searchpage.jsp?_dyncharset=UTF-8&id=pcat17071&iht=y&keys=keys&ks=960&list=n&sc=Global&st=intel optane h10&type=page&usc=All Categories
(7 of the 10 listing use the 512GB and 3 of the 10 listings use the 1TB.)
Looking at the HP...
Would be interesting to also see load times (with and without Optane cache) where hard drives were filled 75% to capacity (maybe 90% to capacity as well) before installing the benchmark.
I use Primocache too. Works great.
AMD StoreMI also works, but there are at least two things to consider:
1. 16GB Optane is a very small capacity for software (auto-tiering) that moves blocks rather than copying them. Changing the read I/O promotion to slow should help but I am still concerned...
Noticing on ebay 16GB Optane (both used and New pull) are available for under $12 shipped.
Seems like a really good opportunity for those with more than one M.2 NVMe slot and a supported chipset.
EDIT: Some Game load time results below from the following Tweaktown review...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.