Yes I know. These theories exist not because they are correct but because
no one has proved them wrong....
Actually I find quantum physics somewhat easier to grasp since I'm prepared
for its "madness".
But just like you said - when you take the concepts of "the normal world" to
new...
If you have any good way of "seeing it" that you could explain - and
you feel that you have the time for it - please do!
To me it just seems like utter madness....
OK- this is an old-school example but I'm having problems
with it...
1. If you have a train moving at the speed of light and you
stand inside the train and then fire a beam of light from
the back of the train up to the locomotive. What wold happpen?
How fast would the beam travel inside...
ok - I don't want to be the the no-go here or so but...
why do you want to build a railgun in the first place?
if you want to "launch things" there are reasons as to
why todays guns use:
1. gun powder
2. compressed air
I suppose that if you want to learn about rail-guns - fine...
That was simple enough... thanks!
I poked around in there but never thought that the text
"Use Personalized Menus" referred to that "feature"....
Anyway - problem solved! Thanks again!
Hi there!
I have this irritating thing going on with my start menu in
WinXP. Even though it itself and some of the folders in
it only contain a few items I constantly have to click
the "- more - "-button to see them.
Now this may be a very small problem but I'm really
starting to...
OK - this may be a bit late but I think that mr bluestrobe here captured very well why som
of us dislike mac:s so much. If you sum it up you get:
1. Macintosh OSX is fine.
2. Macintosh as a company are monopolistic sons of bitches who forces you to make hardware upgrades.
3. Mac:s - to a...
You Mac-lovers keep on raving that software isn't limited and that you can
use most PC-software by emulating it with "virtual PC". Well - why don't
you just get in the game and get a PC I ask?
I mean isn't that a stament - if anything - about how "behind" Mac:s are?
That you actually have...
That was a good example mr punisher.
further down on the site:
"It makes use of the full 64-bit addressing available on these processors. Windows 64-Bit Edition provides for a 1 terabyte (1000 gigabytes) addressing space."
sounds like that is going to be enough of VM for a while forward...
ok - did a search and found some stuff about it being possible to use more
RAM for each process (just like you said). Didn't really understand it but ok
- virtual memory theoretically works better with 64-bit.
Anything else? Win XP 64-bit won't really blow my socks off right?
I was just thinking. Why isn't 32-bit enough? What benefits will we actually
see if the entire industry just jumped to 64-bit processors and software?
Will it be faster? More stable? Easier to code? Will we (the end users) actually
see any perfomance jumps when microsoft (finally) realeses...
ok... you propably did wise there. The 6800nu:s are not bad at all!
Used ones 175? ok... I'm beginning to see your point. I live in sweden
and here used ones can be picked up for as low as 100-125!!! Guess
that everyone wanted the new 6800 / X800 series...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.