This is why I ran many tests with varying parallelism and problem sizes. The latter is three dimensional. There are inflections in the runtime curves. One of them is from singleton to multiple parallel processes.
I have clocked the start-to-finish time of parallel processes from within each process, and compared them to the start-to-finish times of singleton parallel processes with the same per-process load. The singleton execution times were about 75% of the parallel execution times.
I haven't checked.
Yes.
My hardware has 10 cores capable of two threads each. The CPU is overclocked, typically achieving 5.12 GHz under heavy loads. The board is liquid cooled.
My Windows O/S is set to prioritize applications.
I instructed Mathematica to run 12 parallel kernels, which results in 12 computational...
@Nothingness
I have finished the benchmark tests of the improved algorithm on my memory-upgraded system. Here are some takeaways.
Overall improvement in runtimes: from weeks to days.
Overall paradigm shift: prior to memory upgrade, the most efficient approach was to parallelize the innermost...
For those who buy Supercomputers in the black, a single machine is about $300 million. If the secret procurement is from a U.S. government entity, then the manufacturer must also be in the U.S.
What do you folks think of Intel's Foundry subsidiary?
Additionally, in the long run will it be all that remains of the current company?
https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=23727093&gfv=1
I've implemented an option to switch between 4 different "levels" of parallelism: none, by targets, by queries, or by reflexes (original). Next I'll examine how these options scale with size.
https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3279847
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.