"creationism is very emotional and is not based on facts rather teaches you to feel but often goes beyond reality such as hell and heaven
one cannot experience pain after death but only before death and after birth
Nuff " -wchou
hrmmm. I think this goes back to tangible vs...
This is funny...it's blown up into one big philosophy trip.
The point everybody is fussing is that......truth is definitive. As humans we will never be able to see truth in its entirety...we're too stupid and incapable. It is BEYOND our capacity.
The whole point of this thread is where...
I thought we invaded Iraq for violation of the guidelines setup post Iraq war by the United Nations? That did include WMD's...but wasn't it nice to uncover the food for oil scandal and many other stories that were not reguarded as high news priority? I remember Bush made a huge claim and push...
you also have to admit....even our news agencies aren't credible, why in the world would a link give anybody else credibility. You can spare the "objective reporting" crap...everybody provides bias towards their reporting.
It's sad that people can't look at this objectionally. As much as France refuted against the reasons for entry in the war (not just WMD's). Why would they agree with many other intelligence communities concerning information about where WMD's may have been hidden?
Could you provide the link to that place on his web site then? That email was pretty old and I can't find where you read the article on his site. The email I posted just supplemented his argument.
Point out one of the symbolic words for time you're referring to?
I advocate the recognition of our subjective view on what definitive truth might be :)
POV from a limited capacity will always be subjective, no matter how intelligent, knowledgable, or learned one might be. We're all flaming idiots...some just have a more logical approach. Our faith...
uh...I have no idea what you are referring to. If you look at what I posted the gentleman and his theory is laid out. Argue against the point the gentleman made...disprove his math maybe?
That guy is not talking about every other idea thrown around in the bible. What he referenced he laid...
I agree...however, he wants one he can carry through an upgrade. I guess it depends on how much oc'ing he's gonna attempt since they both mount on Prescott's and A64's
eye could send you pics :)...it's not hard when it's friggin cold in ur room. The thermostat in the hall says it's about 72F but I think my room is colder than that
but you also have to remember....that's the mobo givin me those #'s. It's an Aopen mobo on 865chipset. I keep the side...
to what extent does questioning the faith of others promote close mindedness? Does it not make you curious as to how and why somebody might so "blindly" believe? Human nature drives us all to find faith in the tangible...does it make them stronger or weaker for placing faith in the intangible...
fjord...well said
I probably did not clarify myself too well but essentially you went into the detail I was referring to. I'm just not a bright kid :)
Indirectly I am pointing out that many people equate a fact as truth. However, degenerative semantics play a huge role in exactly how...
just because it is a fact does not mean it is "true". Our perception of truth is subjective. We are not omnipotent beings....therefore we must calculate variables in the hypotheses and theories that we test. Obviously we will never have the capacity to take into account every variable in all...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.