Yeah... once you enable TSSAA you end up with this..
Because the AA is being handled as a compute task in parallel with the Graphics etc tasks.
So you gain quite a bit.
Oh... and it is clearly not just about AMDs bad OpenGL drivers. How many other games can you name where a FuryX slaughters...
It is not just the Vulkan results... but the various postings some of us have been doing on this subject which garnered the attention of scores of gamers. When you couple the two... folks are pausing and coming to realize that... AMD are not going away anytime soon.
Like I said back on...
Oh... so like everything we were talking about is now starting to come into play? Gee Whiz... who would have thought?
When you see a FuryX demolishing a GTX 1070 under Vulkan in Doom... you probably start to realize that those of us who were saying that this was coming were probably not...
The clock speed and additional ROPs are the most likely culprits.
Some dude just overclocked a reference RX 480 to 1.5GHz..
He obtained near Fury-X performance. Add another 200MHz or so and you should be near GTX 980 Ti performance... with only 32 ROPs.
So it is not that impressive. What is...
Well it appears to be true... look at the ALU performance (proving it is running at 1898MHz).
2(1898 x 1920) = 7.2 TFlops and the figure that PCGameshardware obtain is 6.9 TFlops.
If it were running at a nomial boost clock of 1683MHz then we would get a theoretical TFlops MAX rating of 6.4...
Which only further proves that it is a 48 ROPs part. In the test above they have set the boost speed to 1898MHz (read the picture posted by Silverforce carefully).
I think that the TechReport (once they post their GTX 1070 review and their "sizing them up" section) may prove to be enlightening...
Actually... Silverforce11 appears to be right.
Take the clock speed and multiply it by the number of ROPs and you get the theoretical Pixel Fillrate.
Take 1898MHz x 48 = 91 GPixels/s. If you look at the GTX 1070s performance it is around 85 GPixels/s. In other words... it only has 48 active...
Not in the slightest.
With all due respect, I am recommending the Oxford books for you because they are great starting points for people struggling with English. Take your sentence formation for example, "Oh, touchy. I hit a nerve?" would be the proper way to communicate your message...
Here is one of many sources available to anyone who does a simple Google Search...
Stock issues will not improve until sometimes in July or August..
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/52650/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-stock-improve-until-late-july/index.html
You have a history of misquoting me or making stuff up about things I have said. If you do not have time to search my posts then it would be common decency to simply not attribute claims to me of which you are not certain.
Umm... it is an educated guess based on these rumors holding true. If these rumors are not true then my guess is not valid. I have predicated my statements on these rumors holding true... re-read my posts.
If you have issues comprehending how the English language works I suggest you get...
Can you quote me plz? On wait.. you cannot because you are making stuff up.
I did state that Pascal would be slower than Vega (if you find my quote you will see that this is what I stated). This appears to be true no?
As for AMD launching first... do you have a quote on me stating this? I...
You will need a very high clocked 1080 Ti and that chip is much larger than the 1080 which has issues keeping heat under control beyond 2000 MHz. The overclocking headroom on Pascal is not there on the smaller chips therefore it likely will not be there on the larger chips.
AMD on the other...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.