Korean media invented new numbers for an old news:
https://www.dispatch.com/story/business/2024/10/30/reuters-special-report-inside-intels-18a-chip-process-delays/75928072007/
It was 20% for broadcom (maybe big ai chips?).
Lmao, do you understand what is ISA?
And you can't even understand this: :p
avx512 requires much less effort to programming than avx256.
The only (albeit big) problem is ISA fragmentation caused by Intel's silly decision to not implement avx512 in client cores.
It is Intel's (political) stubbornness to not implement avx512 in client cores. AMD already proved that avx512 can be implemented with 256 datapath and gets reasonable throughput gains.
If you ever touched simd codes, you won't spam "AVX3-256" bullshit. Most (all?) avx512 instructions have...
Sierra Forest is ~578m^2/38 cluster with IMC+L3+mesh.
55mm2/24 core (6 cluster?) is unsurprising, while the smaller overall size definitely helps interconnect latency.
It would be mostly interesting to see how much L3 it gets.
This is what you wrote:
M3 is around 2.5m^2, 1.36x is normally not in the range of "super big".
Skymont doesn't reach the performance level of Lion Cove, so the comparison is moot.
Coves aren't that big -- any core will be similarly big with a big cache (under similar process/library).
Maybe Intel should consider Telum 2's shared L2/3 approach (plus vertical cache), which looks pretty good on numbers.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.