What is Snowden treated like a hero in some circles?
He certainly illegally accessed a system and released its information playing the moral authority card and didn't go through proper channels.
The argument put forth in the case was completely different.
Secondly, the court case you provided upholds the position that a homosexual owned catering/service business would be forced to attend a WBC rally.
All lawful things protected by the 1st Amendment and upheld by the Supreme Court.
Using the same logic, forcing a Christian wedding photographer to listen to an offensive homosexual wedding ceremony, as a business, should be forced to endure it.
The Westburo Baptist Church is an federally/IRS recognized 501c3 religious organization. Their anti-homosexual protests where they spew hate have been upheld by the Supreme Court as lawful exercise of their religious expression/free speech.
Say that there is a homosexual owned/operated...
Its interesting that you put for this this progressive interpretation of the homosexual lifestyle while that faction spews continuous hate towards people who may not agree with it specifically religion.
You paint a picture that these progressive groups want to hold hands and sing with in...
Incorrect on all accounts.
Hate speech is a made up term and the Supreme Court has already upheld WBC right to conduct these events.
Failure to cater such an event if your business caters would be text book religious discrimination.
The current disfunction is the middle east can be directly attributed to Obama/Clinton destabilization policies in the middle east during the disaster that was the 'arab spring'.
The Westboro Baptist Church is a federally recognized religious organization and its protests are legal protected speech/religious expression.
Would you fine or jail the a homosexual owner/operate of a catering/service company for refusing to cater a WBC anti-homosexual rally?
Refusal to cater...
California/Los Angeles prosecuted (resulting in a plea/no-contest) Holly Ashcraft under similar circumstance.
Do you hold the state of California/Los Angeles in the same respects?
The Supreme Court has ruled numerous times including Snyder v. Phelps that government cannot be the arbiter of speech thus making the term 'hate speech' complete subjective and without meaning.
Who are you to judge what is/is not hate speech? The simple fact that you are trying to discredit certain forms of speech because you and you alone may not agree with it undermines the core foundation of what the United States was founded on.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.