The 390(x) was competitive insofar that it was around the performance levels of the 980 with worse performance/watt. The 290 series was also competitive in performance only. But back then AMD had the Fury series for the high end, now they have nothing.
No magic driver optimization will bridge...
Undervolting is great when it works for an individual card. AMD set stock voltages for a reason though, this does not make all Vega 56s more efficient in comparison to the 1070 since you can undervolt some of them too.
I don't intend to shut you up.
Please back up your claim by linking to a couple of reviews comparing msaa and cmaa (in a previous post you wrote csaa) on Vega. Prove it.
Your preferences are yours only and not for discussion.
What games are you talking about specifically? Except for Dirt which was already mentioned of course.
First things first: No, Vega 56 is not much faster when you don´t use MSAA.
Also, could you be more specific when you write that haven´t seen a review that doesn´t use 4x MSAA? Specific games? Specific reviews?
In addition, i wanted to point out that using Vega 64 or 56 as a 4k card is not...
Thanks to betting everything on HBM2, they have way less wiggle room when it comes to price.
It is sad that going full HBM did not pay off at all for them.
- They dont have a speed-advantage or power-advantage in the prosumer/datacenter market. From my POV, going full HBM *could* have made...
There is no need to respond in any way other than to keep selling their superior product. The same thing they have been doing for the past year.
That implies that they can take their time to launch Volta. And once they do that, Vega will be a 480/1060-esque chip at a 500sqmm die-size. Ughhhh...
Just because they started to design Vega...maybe 4 years ago, does not mean that there are no major changes made along the way. Its not like after 6 months everything is set in stone and they are just waiting for silicon to come back. Raja was is full control of this thing, he is at AMD since...
Pcper uploaded their latest podcast with Vega FE discussion:
Basically, they all seem to be quite concerned about it. Reiterating that AMD has to price this right to have a successfull product, also talking about the (lack of) TBR not being a be-all end-all solution that will catapult Vega in...
You know damn well what Phynaz means.
The way you provide "facts" here is meaningless without context. Any GPU thats so old will not perform well in a benchmark designed to stress modern hardware.
I find it quite surprising that Nvidia even invested time and money to get this done actually. Its...
Considering that AMD said that the NCUs are designed for higher clockspeeds, they did not get very far as of yet. A clock speed of 1600 is not a huge jump compared to Polars-based cards.
While the old vs. new Doom results are odd indeed, its been quite a long time since we saw that video.
It is actually possible that parts of the new hardware features may not work and would require major reworking which is not feasable for AMD for a variety of reasons. What if their entire...
There is hope that a lot of potential performance is not used at the moment. We dont know for certain if thats the case or not. I find it unthinkable that the RX variant will perform like this in games, but then again every couple of years a Bulldozer, Pentium 4 or Geforce FX happens.
Either...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.