How exactly am I melting down from your failure to answer questions?
1. How many papers are in the climate science literature?
2. How many papers in Cook et al. (2013) quantified AGW as +50% (Humans are the primary cause)?
3. Where are the rebuttals to the 97 refutations of the...
It not only discredits the theory that the missing heat is in the deep oceans but it also in the upper oceans. Either way it discredits Paratus's use of the oceans to account for the atmospheric flatline in temperatures. Maybe you should try actually reading next time.
You are seriously...
You still have not provided a source for your graph. The heat content at the ocean surface does not account for the pause in global warming.
That is not a study but a comment by the cartoonist on an actual study and it has been refuted.
Reply to “Comment on 'Ocean heat content and...
Just as expected, eskimolie continues to dodge the questions.
1. How many papers are in the climate science literature?
2. How many papers in Cook et al. (2013) quantified AGW as +50% (Humans are the primary cause)?
3. Where are the rebuttals to the 97 refutations of the cartoonist's paper...
eskimolie, I have not lied once while you have repeatedly dodged multiple questions.
1. How many papers are in the climate science literature?
2. How many papers in Cook et al. (2013) quantified AGW as +50% (Humans are the primary cause)?
3. Where are the rebuttals to the 97 refutations...
The parts I quote related to the actual study and the work they did in the study. The debate with Paratus was about missing heat in the deep oceans, this NASA study disproves that.
This statement is incoherent.
You actually cherry picked wording and distorted its context.
Did you even...
@senseamp
So are going to continue to be a hypocrite and not apply your "scientific" standards to proponents of AGW?
Irrelevant, my rebuttals and resources are for skeptics and I never claimed otherwise.
If alarmists are wrong and their policies implemented, energy costs will skyrocket, the...
This is a strawman argument as I have never claimed my site to be either experimental science or a meta-analysis of experimental science. My site is effectively various rebuttals and resources that can be used by skeptics for debating this topic. These resources include scientific references and...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.