Seriously?
Te topic of the thread is i7-7700 or Ryzen1700.
It was not about the 7700K, but the regular 7700. You know the one with a clock speed of: 3.6Ghz-4.2Ghz. (or 14-6% lower)
If you want to choose between a i7-7700 and R7-1700 then the only correct answer should be go for the R7 1700.
If you however consider alternatives like the 7700K, you should also consider the alternatives on AMD side like 1600 or 1600x.
Keep in mind that you probably won't notice the...
Well that result would be more believable and more in-line with expectations.
It is also clocked @ 1600MHz which is also more in-line with the expected clock of VEGA.
Doesn't mean that number is more or less valid than the previous one... Just that I prefer to believe these numbers over the...
Why couldn't that be the case?
4770K specification: 3.5 base - 3.9GHz boost
6700 specification: 3.4 base - 4GHz boost
Seems like both of these chips will have very similar in performance.
So in this case they measure a difference of ~6% where the base diff is ~3%. So all that is well...
The 1400 will still be faster by a big margin.
HT alone will give a rather big uplift, but the cpu's you are comparing also have a big difference in frequency:
the i5 - 6400 has a boost frequency of 3.3GHz, the 1400 -> 3.45GHz. (probably gives similar ST performance)
The base frequency of...
Giving it does not seem to have an impact in a lot of well threaded applications, I wouldn't say it will be a bottleneck before we actually see it in action..
The penalty seems to be very limited to gaming. In the average cases AMD HT scaling is far superior than Intels. See the stilt...
FYI: i rectified my post in less than a minute, so try not to be condecending will you.
how the calculations happened is our guess, only thing i'm seeing is that the perfromance difference is smaller than the perf/W difference.
Simply put if I can do 2 times your job in the same hour. but I...
I understand the sanity, but to be honest things don't add up according to me... but maybe it is to late to think about math for me...
I took the easiest one to think about --> handbrake
Ryzen needs 4minutes33 seconds in handbrake
I7 needs 6minutes27
That would make Ryzen ~30% faster...
Did you even read your own link?
The 7700K (intels fastest 'gaming' chip according to some) wins 2 benchmarks. (of 6)
The 6800K wins 2 (or 3 benchmarks). (of 6)
True, the other results are virtually tied (gpu bottleneck maybe).
Like pointed out in other threads against you, these results are...
completely bottlenecked by gpu, not by cpu. tests are meaningless except to prove that the cpu is not the bottleneck . (where the 8xxx probably would be the bottleneck).
That is a GPU bottleneck. Overclocking a 4c8T cpu in that test won't change that bottleneck at all. What that review tells you is that the models with more cores have a higher cpu limit. So if you pair it with a faster gpu, you will get better fps than with the 4c8t cpu. (in those particular...
Probably because the results are scewed due to overclocks on the intel side.
I you look at the graph below, you can see where the results are including the deviation. They also report themselves that the Ryzen was overall faster. (taking into account that it is comparing an average result...
well the idle power consumption was 40W.
So assuming that the other components during the test consumed as much as the cpu in idle mode, you would have 114-40W = 74W delta on the power cable.. PSU efficiency of 90% would give close to 67W.
So close enough i guess.
Your assumption being that scaling from 4 to 8 core is the same if the memory configuration stays the same, which is highly doubtful given that we see huge memory impact on a quad core.
That said, this discussion has much to do about nothing. We already know these are synthetic tests... and...
^ This
The clock difference between 7600K and that 4c/8T ryzen is ~8% for single core.
note: If we assume that the X boosts higher (reported to be 3.9+), you might even have a boost advantage for some or well cooled ryzen samples.
Also important to note that the i5 7600K is a 91W TDP model...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.