The aforementioned video was deleted. I deleted it because the speaker drops the "F bomb" every few seconds. We try to maintain a family atmosphere in our support forum so we cannot allow this video to stand as is.
Just a lil nugget to add here, AFAIK, manual overprovisioning accomplishes the same goals as factory overprovisioning with 1 exception. According to (either LSI/SandForce or LAMD/Hynix, I can't recall which) only factory set/firmware controlled OP can use the OP space for bad block replacement...
The only way to know for sure is to install them and test them together. It will depend on your MOBO. The newer the board the better your odds. Best answer is, probably.
Look in your manual at the motherboard diagram. The Intel ICH10-R will be the 6 SATA2/3Gb ports.
It's probably Marvell based (which is bad IMO) and you'd probably lose TRIM using a device like this.
Words to live by. On X58 in my experience the ICH10-R runs circles around the Marvell controller in most benchmarks and in pretty much all real-world usage. I'd forget about the Marvell controller, disable it in BIOS, and just enjoy the Intel ICH10-R until you decide to upgrade.
What specific problems are you having? And, are you on an AMD system? If you are on an AMD system, 1600 is probably the max mem frequency you need to aim for. Anything past that is unstable for most users.
EDIT: I see you are on an Intel system. Here's a quick test that will likely tell you...
DOH! Brain was thinking in bits, but I typed bytes. So yeah, my speeds are good. 125MB/s is a VERY brief peak. Averages drop to about 800mb/s on big files.
I still need to test enabling/disabling the DOS permissions. Is the specific parameter you disabled the "SUPPORT DOS FILE ATTRIBUTES"...
Ahhh....good call on the MSDOS permissions, I'll give that a try as I have that same issue.
I have been lazy but need to troubleshoot a speed issue. I'm gigabit all the way thru my network but I'm capped at about 100-125MB/s MAX either to or from a fast SSD RAID-0 array. The system has 16GB...
Deaks2, just curious.....did you ever test with and without the ZFS cache drive? It's been a while since I tinkered with my array but IIRC, I could see very little difference with it vs without a cache drive. That was RAID-Z1 on ICH10-R with 5 x Hitachi 2TB drives, and 1 cache drive.
Of...
You should be fine with that PSU. Up until 2 weeks ago, I still ran an old HX620 on my test bench. Rock solid, bullet proof, and still strong. I've used it with modern boards all the way to 990FX based and Z77 based boards.
Over about about 18-20 months, I never had any issues using various incarnations of RAID-0 and SandForce based SSDs on 2-3 different Intel controllers.
EDIT: Make that 24-30 months.
TRIM is taken into consideration in that article, on the page before the one I linked. The TRIM standard and ATA Secure Erase standards were fully in place long before the article was written.
In every SSD tool box/utility I see, there's a Secure Erase function. Seems odd that the people...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.