Pass Your Microsoft 70-483 Exam Easy!

is it valid dump for march-april 2014

Hi,

Am upto get done with 70-483 exam (Programming in C#) on 21st may (Day after Tomorrow) in india !! I couldnt see more than 5 questions in the dumps. could you please provide me all the questions in a pdf file or am not sure i dont know to use the dump file :( could you please tell me how to view all the 60 questions ???

Please tell me as soon as possible as am in an urge to view all those and get done with my exam which is nearing !!!!

Awaiting for your response. !!

Thanks in Advance. :)

It is valid. Cleared it today with 875.(India)

Passed the exam with 875 marks.
Please add VCE file for 70-484 .

@matshj

This one is correct
FROM amount IN loanAmounts
WHERE amount % 2 == 0
ORDERBY amount
SELECT amount

The reason for this is very simple. SQL by default orders by ASC. There is no need to tell it order by ASC. Adding ASC will still work fine, it is just redundant. That is why the above is the correct answer :)

passed last week using ur vce as prep.
Best regards and wishes !!! :)

Q33, Can the answer not be C as well? Why not, if not?

Q6
FROM amount IN loanAmounts
WHERE amount % 2 == 0
ORDERBY amount ASCENDING
SELECT amount

and

FROM amount IN loanAmounts
WHERE amount % 2 == 0
ORDERBY amount
SELECT amount

Both are a correct answer. the later alternative returns the result sorted asc. Witch one MS considers right I dont know..

For answer to Q62 to be correct option B must say:
Insert the following code segment at line 10
[Conditional("DEBUG")]

Q7: isnt the correct answer B and not A as shown in the test?
var fs = File.Open(Filename, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.ReadWrite);
Will throw an exception if the file dosent exist while
var fs = File.Open(Filename, FileMode.OpenOrCreate, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.ReadWrite);
Will create it and will not throw an exception?
anyone can confirm?

Q6 must be:
FROM amount IN loanAmounts
WHERE amount % 2 == 0
ORDERBY amount ASCENDING
SELECT amount

OET : You are correct for Q63 the answer is C

Hi,

For Q63, I think the right answer is C not A.

Because the question say "Not raise an exception".

I'm right ?

Q8: InvalidCastException when accessing the Data property
Answer D: dynamic dataContainer = obj;
else the exception is thrown in the cast instruction

K: Thanks. I wrote this today and noticed that in the exam we had that extra (crucial) bit of info.

Thank you Sophye, and everyone else. This dump is still fantastic. All the best with your future pursuits.

Rob Stark: You are correct. Sophye is wrong. For Q18, the answer is BE. It is missing the requirement "The EmployeeType property value must be modified only by code within the Employee class."

protected string EmployeeType
{
get;
private set;
}

If I'm beating this to death, tell me to stop, but I figured we want to learn as much (more, hopefully) as we want to pass.

From MSDN - Asymmetric Accessor Accessibility:

Restrictions on Access Modifiers on Accessors

Using the accessor modifiers on properties or indexers is subject to these conditions:

You can use accessor modifiers only if the property or indexer has both set and get accessors. In this case, the modifier is permitted ON ONE ONLY of the two accessors.

The above is copied from MSDN, verbatim, except for the capitalisation (which is my doing). Not the best grammar, of course, but it is patently clear - you cannot add access modifiers to both accessors, ever.

Does no one else find adding access modifiers to BOTH accessors (get and set) disconcerting?

According to the documentation, you CANNOT have an access modifier on both get and set - one if them has to retain the same access as declared for the property. Indeed, if you try this in with a simple test application, you will get the error message: Cannot specify accessibility modifiers for both accessors of the property 'PropertyName'.
I have been taking Microsoft exams since the 90s, and there have always been dud questions, but it still bugs me.

Still valid Dump. I passed it today with a few errors in the Dump:
- The Linq answer is :
ORDERBY amount ASCENDING
SELECT amount
- Protected Get and PRIVATE SET (and not protected set as mentionned in the dump)
- The Lambda Expression question is different, there is only 2 choices and the answer is :
User.Renamed += (sender, e) => {..};
and
users.Add(User);

Still valid dump . I need the 484 please

I passed my exam and the question Q18 was a little different.

The EmployeeType property value must be accessed only by code within the Employee classor within a class derived from the Employee class.

The EmployeeType property value must be modified only by code within the Employee classor

answer : protect Get. private Set

The questions are not exactly the same. It has some difference it is just important to understand the kind of question

@rbu

I'm with you on that on.
Firstly, if you set the accessors as protected when the property is set as internal, you get the following error: The accessibility modifier of the accessor must be more restrictive than the property.
Secondly, only one modifier can be modified. Placing an access modifier on both get and set results in an error.
Therefore, the answer, as given, cannot be correct.
Of course, it would not be the first time that a Microsoft exam featured a wrong "correct" answer. :)

why Q18's answer is 'AF' ( protected get / protected set ). It's not possible that the 'get' and 'set' accessor are declared as protected. so the it must be specified the access level from the property. i think the right answer must be 'E' (protected string EmployeeType) instead 'AF'

valid, 925

Sorry bad drag an drop :
the response Q6 is :

from amount in loanamounts
where amount %2 ==0
order by amout ascending
select amout

why Q6's answer is "orderby amount select ascending amount" instead
"orderby amount ascending select amount".

For Q44 the same, i'm a bit confused the way the question and answer have been designed..

Not sure I understand why Q9's answer is DataContractJSONSerializer instead of DataContractSerializer. There's no mention of JSON in any other part of the question.

Thanks for the help !

Good job fixing it.