- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,684
- 6,227
- 136
Why stretch an outdated platform to 2027 and beyond? Socket compatibility is irrelevant to the overwhelming majority of users.
It is in between Golden Cove and Zen 4, closer to the former than latter.So does triple-decode Skymont have higher IPC? 🤔
You're the one who was making the 32% IPC claim bud, or are you saying you actually had zero proof this entire time?Yeah, I gotta see it to believe it.
I had 5 minutes allocated for Granite Ridge. What did we actually get? 3-4 minutes?She spent more on Zen 5 than I thought she would... now onto AI
I'm curious as to how you back this up. AM4 compatibility certainly mattered to me, eventually; and I can randomly sample into "majority" just as well as I can into "not majority".Why stretch an outdated platform to 2027 and beyond? Socket compatibility is irrelevant to the overwhelming majority of users.
Yes! It's either that or Turin isn't real.You're the one who was making the 32% IPC claim bud, or are you saying you actually had zero proof this entire time?
What do you mean? No hope in Arrow Lake?So this is it for nearly 2 years. This is like worst case scenario for x86-64.
Why stretch an outdated platform to 2027 and beyond? Socket compatibility is irrelevant to the overwhelming majority of users.
nahAlthough, to be fair Zen5 probably could have had a shot of achieving those magical "40%!!!!" claims if it weren't being bottlenecked by IF/Memory bandwith.
Yes! It's either that or Turin isn't real.
The point is they're not getting that socket perf at 16% PPC.Which do you find more credible? Extrapolations involving estimated clocks from a specint_rate number of a preproduction server part, or AMD's publicly stated figures for the core's performance?
The point is they're not getting that socket perf at 16% PPC.
That would be a new one, yes.Then it seems likely they aren't getting that socket perf.
The only thing seriously outdated is your constant trolling in AMD related threads, FTR the old AM4 platform, CPUs and MBs, sell better in Germany than Intel s current plateform, people just prefer something that can be upgraded two or three year later.Why stretch an outdated platform to 2027 and beyond? Socket compatibility is irrelevant to the overwhelming majority of users.
Or they're just cranking the TDP up to 500W and hoping people think it's free IPC lmaoThen it seems likely they aren't getting that socket perf.
CPU upgrades with the same socket only make sense when you have really cheap SKUs that you buy with the aim to keep it for the short term, until you get something more expensive that suits your needs.I'm curious as to how you back this up. AM4 compatibility certainly mattered to me, eventually; and I can randomly sample into "majority" just as well as I can into "not majority".
Jeez. M$ really has everyone by the balls with this annoying push for Windows 12's AI features.
Doesn't work with 128c part.Or they're just cranking the TDP up to 500W and hoping people think it's free IPC lmao