AMD hasn't lied or missed a single DC part in Zen history so this would be a first.
Everything since Rome was exactly as promised.
Tier 1 OEMs do not dupe people.Dude, you got duped. Get over it.
Trying to reconcile the data.And yet your proclaimed +32% has been proven to be wrong, and the MLID slide's "10-15%+" has been proven to be right.
What are you actually arguing here?
Tier 1 OEMs do not dupe people.
Yeah I know the old days, but neither Xeon nor EPYC side was wrong in projections in many years.You should have seen what customers were hearing from HP/Intel before Tukwila and Poulson releases.
That "feature" needs to be totally... recalledShould be thankful Microsoft didn't push for NPU's on the desktop.
Frequency while gaming will matter. My 7700X may have a 5.4GHz boost clock but it was lucky to be hitting ~5GHz in gaming workloads. If they combine +16% with at least some frequency gain that could explain the difference.I think 16% is underwhelming, and deff worse than Zen 4, but I also don't think it's atrocious.
Also, do you guys notice that the perf uplift in gaming seems to be... weird? Their comparison vs the 14900k (at least from that videocardz leak) is like 13% better on average, which would mean that it's 25-30% better than Zen 4.
No.Maybe the "40%" figure was about NPU performance this entire time. Maybe that's how Kepler/Adroc will save themselves.
Isn't this always the case for every new laptop chipThe numbers mean little if we don't fully know the power draw.
so manyDang, yet another partner on the stage...
For the record, I'm still drinking my beer, but it's not even because of AI, it's because I'm getting bored. So bored that I'm doing work on the side right now... got some stuff I needed to catch up for this upcoming week.
did AMD really compare HX370 to the base M3? Not even the M3 Pro. Apple might be the laptop leader this year with the M4 Pro/MaxView attachment 100277
Impressive numbers, it will be interesting to see how the X Eilte and Strix compare in independent testing.
Lol.That "feature" needs to be totally... recalled
I doubt it. Wider cores don't normally miraculously clock higher with a relatively unchanged node.Frequency while gaming will matter. My 7700X may have a 5.4GHz boost clock but it was lucky to be hitting ~5GHz in gaming workloads. If they combine +16% with at least some frequency gain that could explain the difference.
Do we have 3DMark Night Raid data for Snap X Elite? I want to know what 1.6x improvement means over it.View attachment 100277
Impressive numbers, it will be interesting to see how the X Eilte and Strix compare in independent testing.
I don't put much stock in that comparison. Synthetic graphics performance doesn't correlate well with real gaming performance.Do we have 3DMark Night Raid data for Snap X Elite? I want to know what 1.6x improvement means over it.
Isn't this always the case for every new laptop chip
no need, X Elite has a worse GPU than a Rog allyDo we have 3DMark Night Raid data for Snap X Elite? I want to know what 1.6x improvement means over it.