We will see how the SpecInt Rate turn out for servers.Why ask someone just caught red handed lying to everyone for the last year?
No, that's classic.Apparently this is Turin-Dense:
View attachment 100292
That makes a lot more sense.No, that's classic.
16 funky squares is classic, 12 sausages are Dense.
They're like 74 and 88mm^2 respectively.That makes a lot more sense.
Then this is proof that you knew this entire time that the "30-40% IPC gain" claim was crock, and yet you still spread it. Given your previous record, I am not surprised.Not an MLID slide. I was the one that convinced Adored not to do a video on it, because the IPC number was lower than expected. My fault for accidentally giving MLID more credibility.
View attachment 100291
I wonder how N50 fares there.It's not even that, just that tracking so many L2 instances is hard.
NV is at 2 with B100. MI300 is 8.
Lesser bandwidth requirements.I wonder how N50 fares there.
Still a lotta L2/MALL bandwidth, but I can see why main memory bandwidth is harder to deal with.Lesser bandwidth requirements.
HPC sticks live and die by b/w, client parts can cope.
Well, they do cope. Client HBM parts are nowhere to be found for a reason.
No, that must be Standard Turin, which is 8 cores x 16 CCDs = 128 cores.Apparently this is Turin-Dense... If it's 192 cores, then each CCD has 12 Zen 5c cores.
View attachment 100292
Lisa Su said it was the most energy efficient core AMD designed yet. But yeah, no numbers.You know what was conspicuously absent? Not a single mention of perf/watt. The Zen 4 & RDNA3 presentation dedicated some time to the topic (as well as a slide or 2).
They gave the cinememe numbers (sort of) for GNR and STX.Not a single mention of perf/watt
74 for 8c Classic and 88 for 16c Dense?They're like 74 and 88mm^2 respectively.
Well they didn't reveal the exact date or price yet. So expect a formal announcement in early July with all the good stuff.You know what was conspicuously absent? Not a single mention of perf/watt. The Zen 4 & RDNA3 presentation dedicated some time to the topic (as well as a slide or 2).
yeah.74 for 8c Classic and 88 for 16c Dense?
oh yeah no uarch details either.Well they didn't reveal the exact date or price yet. So expect a formal announcement in early July with all the good stuff.
Can only extrapolate so much from Cinebench.They gave the cinememe numbers (sort of) for GNR and STX.
Works enough?
Perf/W increases by 30% in SIR n-copy. You heard it here first.You know what was conspicuously absent? Not a single mention of perf/watt. The Zen 4 & RDNA3 presentation dedicated some time to the topic (as well as a slide or 2) and yet it was not mentioned a single time for Zen 5 reveal.
Just find RPL, Raphael cinememe scores and do the maff off them.Can only extrapolate so much from Cinebench.
7700X base clocks 4.5ghz at 65WWell they didn't reveal the exact date or price yet. So expect a formal announcement in early July with all the good stuff.
Atta. That's a 105W part (aka 142W).7700X base clocks 4.5ghz at 65W
And the 7700 which is also 65W(88W) base clk is... 3.8 Ghz.Atta. That's a 105W part (aka 142W).
Versus 88W for GNR.
I think Zen 5 X3D will win by a greater margin than Zen 4X3D vs RPL (which is pretty close to a tie), but no longer will power be a thing of mockery when referring to Intel in gaming ( at least I hope).V-Cache will save the day in gaming so we are more or less status quo assuming LNC is a similar IPC bump with a small clock regression.
IMO, the opposite. Client has a better time dealing with the lower than expected IPC gains than server because DIY can cope with 3D V-cache. For servers, Granite Rapids looks much more competitive with Turin now. Both are 128C, Turin should have the per-core perf advantage, but if RWC can manage to clock higher (given a certain amount of power), or at least close to Zen 5....Turin: Still dominant, looks better than desktop does for sure.
Strix is really interesting. ARL-H's NPU isn't rumored to be powerful enough to reach Microsoft's soft requirement of 40 TOPs, is it? Regardless, I'm glad there is an AMD G16 option now from Asus. I skipped out on the AMD g14 options when I bought my 12900h M16 because I wanted the larger screen, and the other larger screen AMD options from other brands had unreasonable compromises for no reason (lower powered dGPU, 512GB SSD rather than 1TB, etc etc).Strix: Good, should be enough to justify the big jump in design wins, also looks a bit smaller than expected.
it has the XMX GPU tile.ARL-H's NPU isn't rumored to be powerful enough to reach Microsoft's soft requirement of 40 TOPs, is it?
AMD won not just that.I'm glad there is an AMD G16 option now from Asus
7700X base clocks 4.5ghz at 65W
9700X base clocks 3.8ghz at 65W