- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,747
- 6,598
- 136
See kids, this is why you should never accept candy from strangers.Is real the 40% IPC uplift or more!
Most likely SeptemberAnyone have any idea when the x870's will be hitting the streets?
Since I am in no hurry I figure I'll wait for the x870's and then see which (670 or 870) mobo I like the best from a design/feature perspective.
OpenAI, is that your creation?Is real the 40% IPC uplift or more!
Zen50% bros are we back?
Well, at least in my memory, I never saw any Geekbench result reporting frequency very wrongly, even when comes to unreleased hardware, it could still have a pretty good detection.
I'm not a member of that resistance group. 48T CPUs should be the bare minimum on desktop if you ask me. AMD can do SMT3 to get there if they are too cheap to add extra cores. Just look how beautiful thread action looks in Task Manager even when doing mundane stuff: http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=thread...m-cpu-market-stagnation.2616907/post-41214765However for some reason there seems to be so much resistance for increasing core count in this forum.
It seems AMD used (for whatever reason) a mix of 1T and nT workloads for the "IPC" average. This is way different from previous Zen reveals. GB results seem to indicate that Zen 5 doesn't have as good SMT scaling as Zen 4. We'll have to wait for detailed benchmarks/reviews before we know for sure.Edit: there are now multiple STX entries on GB6 though which are showing roughly the same PPC, so it seems like, at least in GB6, STX has a much higher PPC improvement than 16%.
It seems AMD used (for whatever reason) a mix of 1T and nT workloads for the "IPC" average. This is way different from previous Zen reveals. GB results seem to indicate that Zen 5 doesn't have as good SMT scaling as Zen 4. We'll have to wait for detailed benchmarks/reviews before we know for sure.
I question the reported clock rate.
And a further caveat: there are various subtests that could use AVX-512 and VNNI (if enabled by GB6) so comparing composite score of Phoenix to Strix may be questionable. Though I didn't see any stand outs in this comparison.
Definitely still need some actual controlled testing but these leaks are just enough so that the train has slowed to a calm pace rather than crash completely .
Compute tests are usually the least bandwidth-demanding tests out there.Is it being choked by the limited cache?
no, L2 is fine.Is it being choked by the limited cache?
The opposite, busto RDNA3 loves compute runs and hates drawing triangles.This should be the most favorable comparison of a 880M / 890M vs a 780M.
It seems AMD used (for whatever reason) a mix of 1T and nT workloads for the "IPC" average. This is way different from previous Zen reveals. GB results seem to indicate that Zen 5 doesn't have as good SMT scaling as Zen 4. We'll have to wait for detailed benchmarks/reviews before we know for sure.
Erm they're both RDNA3 though?The opposite, busto RDNA3 loves compute runs and hates drawing triangles.
Sort of. 3.5 actually works.Erm they're both RDNA3 though?
Someone should go ahead and create a game engine in Golang or Rust.Honestly, I am thinking that at this point, before we get any meaning to extra cores, we'll need a new pattern/language/compiler/profiler that allows automated or greatly simplified threading.
Embark people kinda tried?or Rust.
Embark people kinda tried?
Someone should go ahead and create a game engine in Golang or Rust.
This score isn’t too bad. So we’ve got scores ranging from 2550-2800 so far.It's wrong.(frequency)
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV - Geekbench
Benchmark results for an ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV with an AMD Eng Sample: 100-000000994-37_Y processor.browser.geekbench.com
View attachment 100723
Frankly not that much, things are still up in the air in a lot of ways.I haven't been tuning in as often over the last few days due to work, so what did I miss?
It seems that some people are getting whiplash from the Zen 5 hype train decelerating after Computex to suddenly accelerating??