Usually we don't get the first steppingAnd what's the significance of A0 silicon?
Finally the leaks we’ve been waiting for ages for start coming. Here’s another one:
It was discussed 4 pages ago. The most annoying part is that we don't know what clocks the ST test was run at.Finally the leaks we’ve been waiting for ages for start coming. Here’s another one:
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 APU ES Benchmarks Leak: Up To 25% Faster Multi & 17% Faster Single-Thread Performance In CPU-Z
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 APU ES Benchmarks Leak: Up To 25% Faster Multi & 17% Faster Single-Thread Performance In CPU-Z
Benchmarks of AMD's Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 APU in ES state have leaked out in CPU-z, showcasing up to 25% faster performance over its predecessor.wccftech.com
View attachment 100821
View attachment 100822
View attachment 100823
Yupp, but still it’s something more than just speculation, which we were stuck with previously.Still says "Engineering Sample"
That's super interesting if true. A0 was ready since early 2023, so Zen5 could have launched a long time ago. Also B0/C0 CCDs exist according to certain open source AMD stuff.Would this generation be so special? AMD decide to release high performance DT chips GraniteRidge A0 silicon to consumers.
View attachment 100817
I think someone said it peaked at around 4.5Ghz or so.It was discussed 4 pages ago. The most annoying part is that we don't know what clocks the ST test was run at.
And adroc was talking about 9950x single thread spec, so he still has a chance !Still says "Engineering Sample"
4.43 if you look at the video, however the author looks away in the middle of the ST test, so we only get to see clocks at the end of the test.I think someone said it peaked at around 4.5Ghz or so.
It does not change (the clock), also it's the clock of the first core (and maybe 2nd or 3rd), CPU-z ignores CPPC and prevents you from changing that (unless you use special tools like BenchMate etc and launch it with predefined affinity)4.43 if you look at the video, however the author looks away in the middle of the ST test, so we only get to see clocks at the end of the test.
Not bad considering the benchmark doesn't favor Ryzens.
True. But not even clear what useful task CPU-Z is performing that normal users do. I just use it to see if overclocking the CPU is netting me any gains. It's a quick benchmark to ascertain that. I'm sure AMD doesn't give an ass whether they move the needle in CPU-Z.it would be in tasks that you previously performed poorly in.
Well Zen 4 achieved an "amazing" 1% improvement in CPUz 1T so the results for Zen 5 are astonishingly good, looking from Zen 4 perspective.True. But not even clear what useful task CPU-Z is performing that normal users do. I just use it to see if overclocking the CPU is netting me any gains. It's a quick benchmark to ascertain that. I'm sure AMD doesn't give an ass whether they move the needle in CPU-Z.
Don't get this talking point. At a thousand foot level, if you would expect to find large gains anywhere after making several major architectural changes, it would be in tasks that you previously performed poorly in.
In the x86 notebook market this really doesn't jive with the missing GeForce RTX sticker...Very Premium Thing
Welcome to the new world.In the x86 notebook market this really doesn't jive with the missing GeForce RTX sticker...
The launch for Zen 5 is next month. Strix Point is launching next month. This is quite a different launch to Zen 4.Sandbagged Zen 4 prior to release:
View attachment 100805
View attachment 100807
Real Zen 4 (released):
View attachment 100806
+14% headroom in clock speed (5Ghz+ versus 5.7Ghz on launch)
~8% IPC (early reveal) vs 13% on launch.
>15% ST uplift turned out to be ~29% ST uplift.
You're welcome.
It’s not real because what they announced and delivered were within margin of error.So sandbagging is not real in Zen 4 case because it was 4 months before the release? LMAO
It’s not real because what they announced and delivered were within margin of error.
Hope everlasting. We’re going to be hearing about secret sauce and how Zen 5 is really 50%+ because on some specific AVX512 workload it over delivers, for months to years. We’ll be hearing about sandbagging in nursing homes worldwide in 50 years. “Back in my day, AMD sandbagged so hard….it was glorious”. Ok grandpa.The launch for Zen 5 is next month. Strix Point is launching next month. This is quite a different launch to Zen 4.
The clocks are set in place. They didn’t reveal SKUs or definite clocks last at the Zen 4 computex.
What does Intel have to do with AMD slides?If we use Intel's latest definition of margin of error, sure. +/- 10% gives plenty of wiggle room.
No price, no exact release date.The launch for Zen 5 is next month. Strix Point is launching next month. This is quite a different launch to Zen 4.
The clocks are set in place. They didn’t reveal SKUs or definite clocks last time at the Zen 4 computex.