I can understand handguns not changing design, but tommy gun is horrible.
I can understand handguns not changing design, but tommy gun is horrible.So's the 1911
If you are suggesting bump stocked guns are not a concern I suggest you re-read about the worst mass shooting in history in Las Vegas at that country music concertTry and control a Thompson on full automatic. They are fun to shoot, but waste an extreme amount of ammunition.
We used to carry them on the boats.
If you are suggesting bump stocked guns are not a concern I suggest you re-read about the worst mass shooting in history in Las Vegas at that country music concert
As a second amendment advocate I think Bump Stocks should be illegal along with high capacity magazines. Also anything that is intended to get around the automatic weapons (machine gun) being illegal.
I mean it's pretty simple. I've never voted for a Republican. I've either voted for Democrats or a few times third party candidates. I also vote in the Democratic primaries and I will always vote for the last establishment candidate if I like them And feel that the regular establishment candidate needs refreshing. Such as the past primary my district for congress and for senator. Just the other week.No.
I'll consider it when you post a detailed list of every candidate you have ever voted for local and federal since you became of age to vote.
I mean it's pretty simple. I've never voted for a Republican. I've either loaded for Democrats or a few times third party candidates. I also vote in the Democratic primaries and I will always vote for the last establishment candidate if I like them.
I concur, I'm also just more of a person of defensive mindset.Children at the beach would be in danger of drowning. Your idea is not really feasible.
Preventing children from growing up in abusive households would do more to end crime that guns or armor ever will.
That was an attitude introduced into the world by Jesus to counter the obvious endless tribal violence that comes with an eye for an eye revenge, Unfortunately, like all forms of rationalization that goes hand in hand with self hate, it doesn't take long for corruption of the institution to be rationalized. In the South, particularly, guns are part and parcel of many so called Christian churches.I concur, I'm also just more of a person of defensive mindset.
Shrug, I don't really care about any of this. It just makes more sense to be defensive. You're more likely to be unlucky if you aren't prepared for a situation than if you are, that's all.That was an attitude introduced into the world by Jesus to counter the obvious endless tribal violence that comes with an eye for an eye revenge,
That probably implies that you don't really care to know what is behind why people use that expression. I think that knowledge and preparation go hand in hand. I think also that people spend their lives preparing for things that exist only in their imaginations and create psychological issues like obsessive thinking. Anyway, no worries. Caring and not caring in the long generally run have pretty much the same effect on people who don't care. I think it's only those who do that find treasure.Shrug, I don't really care about any of this. It just makes more sense to be defensive. You're more likely to be unlucky if you aren't prepared for a situation than if you are, that's all.
Oh fuck off you little creep with this nonsense.I'll consider it when you post a detailed list of every candidate you have ever voted for local and federal since you became of age to vote.
Oh fuck off you little creep with this nonsense.
Just give a 30-year average by party who you voted for in general. It's really simple dude. That's my 30-year average I answered it pretty clearly. We know what their position was on gun fanaticism.
Please tell us for which party you voted for in any other elections - for both your senator, congressional rep, and local races. It's as simple as that because one party is for gun nuts and one isn't.
I'll consider it when you post a detailed list of every candidate you have ever voted for local and federal since you became of age to vote.
I mean it's pretty simple. I've never voted for a Republican. I've either loaded for Democrats or a few times third party candidates. I also vote in the Democratic primaries and I will always vote for the last establishment candidate if I like them.
You asked me:
I responded with my requirements to even consider your request.
To which you answered:
Then you get all cranky about it when I restate my request. You make demands and then when someone makes a demand of you, you balk at it. This is as far as I'm going with your request. It doesn't matter who I voted for because you will just continue to disparage me and my choices just as you always do. Not that I care what you think.
I normally vote republican and have occasionally voted for a Democrat, (Bill Clinton for one and I also voted for Jimmy Carter (once)). I did not vote for Nancy Mace in the primary this time around because of her silly shit with Kevin McCarthy.
That is more than you need to know. I hope you feel better now. See I didn't even curse at you or anything. Wow
Dude, I'm not trying to give homework assignments where we have to look up the candidates for local and state elections for the last 30 years and make a long list. That is tedious and unnecessary, and it was a ridiculous request to ask for before revealing your general voting trends, as I did, because that's all the answer we need.
So you basically have voted for the party that enables gun fanaticism to exist, protects gun nuts at all costs, and is directly responsible for the majority of gun violence in this country by how they block any reasonable gun control 99% of the time. That's all we needed to know.
I guess you missed the word “If”I don't know how you contorted that out of what you quoted. You need a reading comprehension class.
Go back and read my post on what I think about Bump Stocks etc...
I'll help you: See Post # 130
It takes two to tango. What Meaningful legislation have the democrats passed to curb gun violence.
In 2009 they controlled both the Senate and the House and had President Obama. Why didn't they make some sweeping legislation.
Gun violence is terrible and it's a hot-button issue, but it's truthfully not as impactful as (for example) our piss-poor medical system. More people were helped by the ACA than would be by increasing gun restrictions. They also rightly knew they'd get a lot further with something like the ACA over changing/'redefining' the constitution, and cost them the next couple elections to boot.It takes two to tango. What Meaningful legislation have the democrats passed to curb gun violence.
In 2009 they controlled both the Senate and the House and had President Obama. Why didn't they make some sweeping legislation.
The filibuster, which should be eliminated in my option. Basically for the last 25 plus years nothing gets done unless there is a 2/3rd majority in both chambers.It takes two to tango. What Meaningful legislation have the democrats passed to curb gun violence.
In 2009 they controlled both the Senate and the House and had President Obama. Why didn't they make some sweeping legislation.
It takes two to tango. What Meaningful legislation have the democrats passed to curb gun violence.
In 2009 they controlled both the Senate and the House and had President Obama. Why didn't they make some sweeping legislation.
No, you ban anything that creates a rapidly fire weapon, or better yet, a semi-automatic weapon. You don't have to ban every single rube goldberg machine.Is the availability of body armor going to guarantee the requirement of them? Are armed gangs going to take over the streets if civilians have access to protection?
So you now have you develop laws for dozens of 'bump stock' like things? How long will that take? How realistic is that to be possible?
But you're falling into the trap that people have for decades. What's a 'rapid fire weapon'? If you want to swing for semi-autos as a class, and place them up with full auto, go ahead, but a lot of people have struck out on that one.No, you ban anything that creates a rapidly fire weapon, or better yet, a semi-automatic weapon. You don't have to ban every single rube goldberg machine.
I wonder how many of Democrats that owns one of those gun would vote to preserve that right if it they thought voting for Trump would mean securing it. All gun banners do in my opinion is make it harder for Democrats to win elections. It’s almost as if they secretly hate themselves and unconsciously are motivated to accomplish that end.No, you ban anything that creates a rapidly fire weapon, or better yet, a semi-automatic weapon. You don't have to ban every single rube goldberg machine.
I’m not surprised the bump stock ban was overturned by this scRotus, no brainer. I wonder how man magatarians remember who implemented it.