Yeah. AI texture compression incoming with 5000 series!^^^^
Def too optimistic at the low end.
in an 8K benchmark.Just a memory overclock on a RTX 4090 gets 13% better performance.
With just an easy memory OC of swapping AD102 to a new PCB with binned memory chips. ezpz.in an 8K benchmark.
Interesting bit about GDDR7
The prefetch part just means the total GT/s can be double the previous generation. GDDR6 was double GDDR5, and DDR5 was double DDR4.Another change is that a 32-bit GDDR7 memory interface gets subdivided into four 8-bit channels, which helps facilitate fetching larger chunks of data. Where GDDR5 was an 8n prefetch, and GDDR6 was 16n, GDDR7 will have a 32n prefetch architecture. This is a way to pull larger amounts of data from DRAM while still operating at relatively low clocks.
Without knowing boost clocks, this near 2.9GHz base clock means nothing much.Rumor: GeForce RTX 5090 base clock nears 2.9 GHz - VideoCardz.com
NVIDIA RTX 5090 with significantly higher base clock Chiphell leaker Panzerlied claims that the RTX 5090 may see much improved base frequency. Discussion on Chiphell forums has led to new details about the RTX 5090 graphics card. Panzerlied, who previously revealed that the RTX 5090 will use a...videocardz.com
RTX 5090 should be an excellent upgrade for 3090users.
If true, then boost clock is expected to be around 3.2ghz (with the memory bandwidth to feed the GPU and improve clock scaling).
GB207 is not interesting with even less SM than AD107.2.9 is likely the stock boost although you should expect that chips should be able to get over 3 in most games.
GB207 has 20 SMs, btw. Also it seems that the desktop version has a decent shot at using GDDR6 only, although I suppose that could change. The 4060 uses 17 gbps, so there's room for higher even with GDDR6.
GB207 is not interesting with even less SM than AD107.
GB206 looks a lot better in comparison, still 36SM and GDDR7.
Of course higher price, but I expect 8 and 16GB variants.I suspect the GB206 prices are going to be decently higher and/or the L2 cache is going to be slashed.
Edit: Also likely only 4070 NS performance best case. And 8 GB.
Of course higher price, but I expect 8 and 16GB variants.
If there will be 24gbit modules at that time, then they will go with It for 12GB Vram, but I don't think It will be available at that time.I am not sure there is room for it, assuming the price gap would be more than the $100 that was the difference between the 4060 Tis. I am thinking if 3 GB chips arrive sooner than thought, perhaps they would rush that out as a pricier option instead of 16.
GB206 would need to be 27-33-38% faster to be on par with 4070, that's not very likely, but I don't see a reason for cutting down 32MB L2 even If GDDR7 provides a big increase in BW .Now that I thought about it... Realistic best case?
GB203 - A tad slower than the 4090 D.
GB205 - Between 4070 Ti Super and 4080, maybe.
GB206 - A bit faster than the 4070 NS but that might be a stretch. Plus would likely require them to not cut the L2 which I bet they do given GDDR7.
GB207 - Maybe it could eek out a bit over the 4060?
GB206 would need to be 27-33-38% faster to be on par with 4070, that's not very likely
, but I don't see a reason for cutting down 32MB L2 even If GDDR7
GB207 can't be only a bit faster than 4060 as a new gen unless the price is competitive.
AD106 was bottlenecked by BW, so just GDDR7 will increase performance, but I don't know If architectural changes(IPC, clocks) will provide at least 20% performance on top of that. But I forgot 4060Ti had 2SMs disabled, that's another few percent of extra performance. I think 25-30% is possible If I am optimistic, but not more.True. But unlike 5 and 7, 6 keeps the same amount of SMs. Even 26 gbps GDDR7 would be a 40% increase in memory bandwidth.
You will save only a few mm2 by cutting It down from 32->24MB. Don't think It's worth It, but Jensen knows best.Saves die space.
Why not? Those cards need PSUs capable of feeding them without any issues.Can't imagine Seasonic would be given that info, esp this early.
In my opinion just a more sane naming without any Ti.I'm more surprised at the RTX 5050 existing given 4050 skipped Desktop.
Not surprised at increased power draw. Same node + vastly increased clockspeed.