Golan Heights themselves are disputed territory, and I've never claimed otherwise. It is, however, a dispute between Israel and Syria.
BS. Golan is NOT disputed according to intl law, but occupied territory captured (stolen) by Israel that Israel "disputes" in the same way a bank robber would dispute his owning of the loot. Its a false dispute meant to gaslight dumb fucks into thinking otherwise. Pretty sure you are not a dumb fuck, just a zio-hasbarist in on Israels favorite mode of communicating that mostly involves shameless gaslighting.
Israel has totally left Lebanon according to international law, which I have proven against your claims that Hezbollah's acts are justified. As far as I could find, Lebanese claims for Shebaa Farms only started after May 2000. Pretty weird that when Israel annexed it in 1981 not a peep was heard from the Lebanese government.
Here is a
Lebanese military map from
1966, showing the farms on the
Syrian side (
source):
View attachment 104068
Sheba was captured by Israel in the 67 war but
illegally annexed by Israel later on but is still obligated to withdraw from according to international law and UN resolutions that state the "inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war".
Map or no map there have been differing Lebanese and Syrian positions on the issue over many decades. From the wiki you cite it also cites references that are contradictory and present both cases for belonging to Lebanon or Syria. Not exclusively Syrian as you try to frame your case. Again, from
your referenced wiki :
Historical documents
In 2002, Asher Kaufman of the Harry S. Truman Research Institute at the
Hebrew University of Jerusalem, discovered previously unknown documents in French government
archives. In one, French litigants in a private dispute entered into a private commercial agreement[
when?] that suggested that the border should put the Farms in Lebanon. Two other documents, from 1937 and 1939, were reports from the administrative councilor of south Lebanon and the head of the Services Spéciaux in the Syrian town of
Quneitra. They noted a discrepancy between the border, as determined by the 1:200,000
Ottoman map, and their view of the "reality" in the region. Collecting "unofficial information" from "various sources," they concluded that in their view the area was Lebanese. Their conclusion was based on the facts that: a) some area residents paid taxes to Lebanon; and b) three or four sheep pens in the Farms belonged to residents of the Lebanese village of Shaba.
[45]
In a book published in 1988,
Moshe Brawer, an Israeli geographer, mentions two French maps published in 1932 and 1946, the former shows the farm area as being part of Lebanon while the latter shows the area as a Syrian territory.
[46]
The
Arab League (which includes Syria) backed Lebanon's claim with a communique issued at Arab League's 13th session in 2001, asking for "complete Israeli withdrawal from all occupied Palestinian territory, including Jerusalem, from the occupied Syrian Golan Heights to the line of 4 June 1967 and from the remaining occupied Lebanese territory up to the internationally recognized borders, including the Shab`a farmlands".
[44]
Syria agrees with Lebanon that the Shebaa farms area is part of Lebanon (
from one of the wiki links).
All above are from from the wiki you cite.
It's clear, as I've just demonstrated, that Hezbollah would find some other patch of land no matter what. These organizations will always find something to justify their existence. If it wasn't Shebaa Farms it would've been some other area like Misgav Am or Margaliot.
Clearly you are clueless about the issue, and you just have an agenda supporting a totally unprovoked attack by Hezbollah and Lebanon.
Whats clear is your are a deceptive gaslighter hoping others will not bother to look at what you present more closely. You have been schooled well in Zio-hasbara.