Intel never had the execution ability of Nvidia during their best days. Direct competition with Nvidia would have failed anyway.Jensen would love to kill ARC. He probably hates that Intel got even this close to threatening his dominance in GPUs.
Intel never had the execution ability of Nvidia during their best days. Direct competition with Nvidia would have failed anyway.Jensen would love to kill ARC. He probably hates that Intel got even this close to threatening his dominance in GPUs.
Agree to disagree During Moore Noyce and grove they had that ability also with craig as well it's just after MBA Took on its a disasterIntel never had the execution ability of Nvidia during their best days. Direct competition with Nvidia would have failed anyway.
Remember AMD? was superior to Intel, but yet Intel has the advantage.This should be irrelevant if their claims are proven to be true.
If Nvidia offers a better product with better margins, then the competition should still be able to offer competing products at a lower price. And Nvidia is known for engaging in practices that attempt to stop this dynamic.
Lol why do you think they are betting big on fabs if they succeed at comparable PPA to TSMC every compititor is going to have an issue cause they can drive low end margin products out of marketRemember AMD? was superior to Intel, but yet Intel has the advantage.
nVIDIA will suffer the same fate.
Is about margins.
The only way is that nVIDIA with Mediatek takes over first the low tier market and then the mid tier one.
Maybe everyone just needs to wait for JHH to retire and an MBA to take the helm at Nvidia.
You showed DX11 results. Not apples to apples. DX11 gives different score results.Those database results are all over the place. I don't think I can draw any conclusions from these random submissions. Here are some Z1 Extreme results at near the same resolution as the Intel results.
View attachment 107423
Ha, that's assuming JHH's master plan of uploading his consciousness to Nvidia's in-house supercomputer cluster so that he can run Nvidia in perpetuity doesn't come to fruition sooner.Maybe everyone just needs to wait for JHH to retire and an MBA to take the helm at Nvidia.
its around desktop gtx1050ti gtx1060 so still room for improvement.Damn, Intel pulled BIG this time. And I feel that the nVIDIA GTX XX50 tier for laptop is about to not to be useful anymore. Intel and AMD caugh up with it.
You showed DX11 results. Not apples to apples. DX11 gives different score results.
Yeah, but it renders any XX50 option in danger for nVIDIA. they won't see useful in x86 processors. Maybe they will integrate it on Mediatek processors.its around desktop gtx1050ti gtx1060 so still room for improvement.
The 7000 score is clearly with external gpu as laptop 4060 score around 8k and laptop 4070 around ~10kFair enough, though I don't think it's going to give that much of a different score. However, the main point was the range of scores. Even if I use DX12, it's the same thing. The top Z1 Extreme score is 2x the score you showed. What am I supposed to make of these comparisons when there is a +- 50% spread in the results?
View attachment 107443
The 7000 score is clearly with external gpu as laptop 4060 score around 8k and laptop 4070 around ~10k
780m vs 4070
View attachment 107494
I asked, a friend to test A770 with same settings as this two xe2 gpus. If its the 20xe2 gpu Intel dx11 gains are big.
View attachment 107496
This is with external gpu
View attachment 107497
Only the upcoming battlemage architecture and forward they were good for some productivity scenarios like davinci and stuffSo, Intel GPU are now pretty competent? Heck, just make a sub forum since I want to know which laptops uses Intel dGPU.