Computerbase has the 288V at 127 pts in Cinebench 2024 in ST.
Computerbase has the X1E-84-100 at 127 pts.
So significantly behind is not accurate when referencing ST. At least in Cinebench.
And it’s been known the whole time that LNL wasn’t targeting MT performance.
Cinebench R24 ST (Notebookcheck):
* M3: 12.7 points/watt, 141 score
* X Elite: 8.3 points/watt, 123 score
* Intel Ultra 7 258V: 5.36 points/watt, 120 score
* AMD HX 370: 3.74 points/watt, 116 score
* AMD 8845HS: 3.1 points/watt, 102 score
* Intel 155H: 3.1 points/watt, 102 score
Taken at these power levels, X Elite has 54% more perf/watt while also 2.5% faster in ST. LNL has horrendous ST efficiency while also being on a better node. When AMD had these numbers over Intel, everyone here was calling Intel as dead. Now that X Elite has these numbers of Intel and you're all saying X Elite is dead.
Cinebench R24 MT perf/watt (Notebookcheck):
* M3: 28.3 points/watt, 598 score
* X Elite: 22.6 points/watt, 1033 score
* AMD HX 370: 19.7 points/watt, 1213 score
* Intel Ultra 7 258V: 17.7 points/watt, 602 score
* AMD 8845HS: 14.8 points/watt, 912 score
* Intel 155H: 14.5 points/watt, 752 score
Taken at these power levels, X Elite has 27.7% more perf/watt while also being a whopping 71.6% faster.
LNL CPU is a disaster.
Battery life of Dell XPS 13 (PC World Youtube Review):
* X Elite: 1,168 minutes, performance of 204,333 in Procyon
* LNL: 1,253 minutes in, performance of 123,000 Procyon
Battery life test with performance figures backs Cinebench results. LNL has 7% more battery life but X Elite has 65% more performance while on battery.