This is a tough call because maybe post 2016 they saw what damage inaccurate or missing context leaks can do and have changed their ways.The Vance material, now that we can see it, was definitely publishable and news outlets ran way more vapid low relevance pieces in 2016 from the Podesta email hack.
I would not say I am overly impressed with the editorial decisions being made that wildly favor Trump at almost every turn somehow.
Trump was aske he got leaked material on an opponent he said he would look at it. So fair game, right?This is a tough call because maybe post 2016 they saw what damage inaccurate or missing context leaks can do and have changed their ways.
I am on the fence on the leaks, we really shouldn’t be getting election advice from an adversary particularly when we do not know its accuracy. I also KNOW if this was Kamala Trump & company would be all over it and they have stated news doesn’t need to be accurate.
The issue here is major news outlets have gone out of their way to NEVER say that there was anything wrong with their coverage in 2016.This is a tough call because maybe post 2016 they saw what damage inaccurate or missing context leaks can do and have changed their ways.
I am on the fence on the leaks, we really shouldn’t be getting election advice from an adversary particularly when we do not know its accuracy. I also KNOW if this was Kamala Trump & company would be all over it and they have stated news doesn’t need to be accurate.
The issue here is major news outlets have gone out of their way to NEVER say that there was anything wrong with their coverage in 2016.
If they came out and said 'we made a mistake in 2016 with our coverage of Clinton and have since revised our policies' I am totally fine with that. My problem is they happily published hacked material in 2016 and now refuse to with no explanation as to the change in policy.
Ok, someone please ‘splain to me how you laugh at a post! This is great. All I know how to do is to like a post. TIA!Exclusive first look at the Trump watch!
Damn, wrong thread. Still funny. No regrets.
View attachment 108340
Press and hold the like response for more optionsOk, someone please ‘splain to me how you laugh at a post! This is great. All I know how to do is to like a post. TIA!
Ok, someone please ‘splain to me how you laugh at a post! This is great. All I know how to do is to like a post. TIA!
thanks in advanceYou've had a Transient Ischemic Attack?
I see 4 options, but not press and hold. I get them (Like, Love, Haha, Wow) by hover and choose.Press and hold the like response for more options
I see 4 options, but not press and hold. I get them (Like, Love, Haha, Wow) by hover and choose.
He wants a dictator. Vance needs to be pressed on this considering Trump said he wanted to be a dictator on day 1.Yarvin argues, is for the American oligarchy to give way to a monarchical leader styled after a start-up CEO — a “national CEO,” [or] what’s called a dictator,” as Yarvin has put it