Wait, wait, what I am lost? VIA gave up and uses now AMD designs?
And how about Intel giving their Core -n designs configuration to small companies like DM&P Electronics (they are taiwanese)
Wait, wait, what I am lost? VIA gave up and uses now AMD designs?So they literally renamed Genoa CPUs?
It's a hard sell to any PC user who can buy an Intel, AMD, or even now Qualcomm processor.Hmm that's interesting. It's definitely leaning on multicore performance though. ST is still rather poor. It beats the i3-8100 in a few scenarios so um great, I guess? The power usage in R23 is pretty bad though. Perf/watt = fail.
Wait isn't that the CPU line they started ages ago that was a MIPs ripoff?While Zhaoxin chips are quite slow the Loongson ones are much faster.
KH-50000 IPC equal to KX-7000，KX-8000 IPC is 30% higher than KX-7000China's Zhaoxin KH-50000 CPU has been taped out. This CPU has 96 cores and its IPC is 30% higher than that of KX-7000, reaching the level of Skylake.
View attachment 108421
KH-50000 IPC equal to KX-7000，KX-8000 IPC is 30% higher than KX-7000
What do you think that it's holding them back from in the desktop and mobike market?
What do you think that it's holding them back from in the desktop and mobike market? Computers have been "good enough" for almost a decade now. Save for playable framerates in ultra on precious few games, there's nothing that the above performance numbers really prevent you from doing.
For big AI, they are perfectly willing to multi-pattern till the cows come home to get their targeted performance numbers. No, its not perfect, but it is sufficient.
They can compensate with better IPC, but it will have a limit for that.China might be making great strides but it all based off of US technology. And without access to the best fabs I don't see them succeeding espically when they can't clock nearly as high. Seems more like a novelty item for now.
Which is fine for desktop, or so we've been told over the years. They are still a bit behind on mobile for anything beyond basic web browsing and office apps.Perf/watt, VIA/Zhaoxin has always used too much power with their CPUs/SoCs.
Depends on the desktop. If you're trying to sell chips in rinky dink OEM desktops with bad power supplies and corner-cutting on the cooling, then having the lower power chip is a huge boon. If it's DiY then yeah it wouldn't matter.Which is fine for desktop, or so we've been told over the years. They are still a bit behind on mobile for anything beyond basic web browsing and office apps.
This motherboard cannot reach 3.6GIntel Core i5 13500H (4P + 8E / 16T) - E-cores Gracemont 1.9GHz @ 3.5GHz (8C/8T)
• CPU-Z (ST): 399,3 (+18,87%)
• CPU-Z (MT): 3 015,8 (+19,81%)
source: https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/attachments/cpu_z_2_09_i5_13500h-jpg.354625/
ZHAOXIN KaiXian KX-7000 3.0GHz @ 3.6GHz (8C/8T)
• CPU-Z (ST): 335,9 ( 84,12%)
• CPU-Z (MT): 2517,2 ( 83,46%)
P.S. ~32% Skymont (KX-8000) IPC uplift over Gracemont (KX-7000), is still a mighty impressive generational gain. This 30% IPC uplift of the KX-8000 will by play a crucial role in ensuring that the processor ends up posting generational gains in multithreaded productivity performance.