Thump553
Lifer
- Jun 2, 2000
- 12,821
- 2,607
- 136
Where did this list come from? Has the trial court authorized disclosure? Personally I have grave doubts the DOJ and/or Jack Smith's office would have leaked this-they are too professional.
Where did this list come from? Has the trial court authorized disclosure? Personally I have grave doubts the DOJ and/or Jack Smith's office would have leaked this-they are too professional.
Compiled based on known information and connecting the dots I would guess. I've gone through a lot of them based on the Smith filing and I gotta say it looks like it's highly accurate.Where did this list come from? Has the trial court authorized disclosure? Personally I have grave doubts the DOJ and/or Jack Smith's office would have leaked this-they are too professional.
We are going to hear the chorus of "DOJ weaponized against Trump" I want to remind people of the SCOTUS timelines in two Trump cases. Colorado to assure Trump gets on the ballot despite aiding and abetting an insurrection. Second, the SCOTUS creation of an immunity right for Trump.
Colorado
Takes up the case Jan 5
Decision Mar 4
Immunity
Takes up case Feb 28
Decision July 1
First one took 2 months when SCOTUS hurried to help Trump stay on the ballot. Second one took 4 months slow walked to ensure trial could not start before the election.
Not able to?Chief Justice Roberts will go down in history as leading the most corrupted conservative controlled SCOTUS in the history of our nation. Ironically, his not being able to rein in fellow conservative scofflaws Thomas and Alito from arrogantly abusing their positions speaks to how Roberts really isn't the actual leader of that Court, rather he is a mere figurehead being manipulated by the real sources of power and influence at the Heritage Foundation and Federalist Society.
Not able to?
He chose not to.
He has no interest in doing so.
Reporting indicates that not only was Roberts not forced into the decision, he actively lobbied for it.I see your point. However, I really believe he didn't have a choice in that matter due to his being nothing more than a subservient lackey of, for and by the people that actually own and operate that thoroughly corrupted court. Reason being, they don't want Roberts interfering with their ability to lavishly swoon their way into owning the hearts and souls of as many conservatives in that court as possible.
To be clear they believe the executive branch should be run by the president if the president is a Republican. If the president is a Democrat the executive branch should be run by random judges in Texas.Federalist society members are all about the unitary executive theory.
I'm surprised Ms. Lindsey Graham isn't on there!
Woman Accused of Running High-End Brothel Network Will Plead Guilty
The brothel allegedly catered to high-profile clients such as politicians, corporate executives, military officers, and academics.
So, when do we get the full, unredacted client list?
Court documents reveal that Han Lee enforced strict rules to maintain the secrecy of the brothel operation and avoid detection.
Investigators said the brothel's websites had a verification process for clients, requiring personal details including names, employers, and references.
With Discovery they should already have it. They are free to release it whenever they want as long as the Judge says its ok.Still hilarious he required this appendix to be released in the middle of November and his version of it. Lol when does the defendant ever get to dictate what the document says.
Anxiously waiting for the immediate research results. Probably some interesting tidbits but will have 0 effect on cult members.Lol damn the appendix is 2000 pages
We already saw the summary, which probably had most of the exciting highlights.Anxiously waiting for the immediate research results. Probably some interesting tidbits but will have 0 effect on cult members.