Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)

Page 850 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

inquiss

Senior member
Oct 13, 2010
219
305
136
It would have been a very different story had AMD launched the 9800x3D chip on Zen 5 launch day. This is the 3rd generation x3D chip. It looks like they are finally getting close to the non x3d clocks.
What else are people gonna buy? They'll buy X3D because it will be indisputably the best gaming chip on the market for gaming.
 
Reactions: Elfear
Jul 27, 2020
20,420
14,090
146
I know it’s partially a reflection of technology stagnation but I can’t understand people that can’t come to grips with the fact they need to upgrade their hardware. I’ve been encountering that more and more in the workplace too, people using 5th/6th gen Intel quad cores refusing to upgrade... “it works fine”….
I'm one of those

BUT I understand that game engines are very complex these days and they need the most CPU power available to perform. It's also partially because no one codes games for fun anymore. It's a frickin' business now with project managers and directors. Not the "bunch of friends in a basement" having fun tinkering with code and creating seemingly impossible to do stuff with the display hardware.

Code quality has certainly gone down for a lot of games these days. They just want to get into making the levels and characters and animation ASAP so they don't make any major changes to the engine when most of the assets are already done. And once the game ships, unless the reception is poor and there is outcry of bad performance on modern hardware, they will rarely touch that codebase again.
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
26,258
15,390
136
I think they are waiting for Zen 6. A lot of the PC builders left the market entirely. The 9800x3D is the CPU for AMD this generation.
In gaming. The 9950x is great for multi-tasking and the Turin is absolutely a BEAST in server !!! Nothing on the market can touch it !

Edit, somewhere I thought I read from phoronix it was a monster. Either way, very soon I can benchmark it for what I do compared to Genoa om MY Turin. a week if I am lucky.
 
Last edited:

CakeMonster

Golden Member
Nov 22, 2012
1,511
665
136
People are kind of getting used to the idea of 24 month cycles with AMD, so those (at least enthusiasts) who aren't buying Z5 now or Z5X3D in the next couple of months, will probably not jump on this gen. I'd love to be proven wrong on the timeline, but if Z5 doesn't appeal enough to me, I'm not jumping in late in the cycle even if system requirements for games and apps go up.
 

OneEng2

Member
Sep 19, 2022
159
203
86
Idiotic software codecs (every RTLxxxx and such) shouldn't be called sound cards IMO but that's nothing new either.

Too bad hardware accelerated sound cards were killed decades ago (thanks M$).

Anyway, today you need either to get out of the case with digital (hence SPDIF) or get the card of the case (various USB, TB and before FireWire cards).

In case some were still wondering, it can make a *huge* difference, quality-wise.
Absolutely. There are still high quality DAC's out there that do a very good job; however, you need to get out of Best Buy country to find them and into "pro audio production" .... which generally puts you into a much higher price bracket than the sound cards of old .
yeah... Bulldozer vs. Skylake vibes. 9800X3d could be 25-30% faster in games vs 285K
Most likely. I still maintain that high end desktop (gaming) is not where the money is. I am wondering how long it will be before AMD moves this technology into the data center and workstation market where they can make huge margins with it.
Chips likes the ALC1200/1220 are more than good enough, problem is that up to the DAC input everthing work well but once it s converted to analog there s score of inherent issues, analog design is not that straightforward in a highly electricaly polluted environment like a MB.
"Good enough" if you are using the pittiful speakers inside your computer monitor, or Apple Airpods. Using high quality over-the-ear headphones, or a quality PA system and suddenly all that crappy design shines through like a fart in church .
In gaming. The 9950x is great for multi-tasking and the Turin is absolutely a BEAST in server !!! Nothing on the market can touch it !
Agree. X3D will dominate gaming, 9950x will be priced below X3D, but still dominate in MT loads. Turin will continue to dominate in DC (all for this design cycle).

I really believe Intel has a winner on its hands with Lunar Lake for Thin-and-light laptops. Unfortunately, that is only 20-30% of the laptop market. It will be very interesting to see how the Arrow Lake laptop versions do in the desktop replacement laptop market.
 
Reactions: Thibsie

Goop_reformed

Senior member
Sep 23, 2023
314
340
96
Computerbase updated their gaming benchmarks with power consumption
also measured.

FI the 7800X3D wich reign supreme in the gaming charts has as much as 3x the perf/watt of the least efficient contender.

Garbage ram though
 

DaaQ

Golden Member
Dec 8, 2018
1,472
1,054
136
Lol my god. On that change.org one he’s using an 11 year old CPU (despite the fact he calls it 9 years old) with a 4070 Ti. Imagine complaining about that in any other period in gaming history.

“Why can’t I run Halo on my 25 Mhz 486DX” is basically the same gap

“Why can’t I play Crysis on a 166 Mhz Pentium”

I know it’s partially a reflection of technology stagnation but I can’t understand people that can’t come to grips with the fact they need to upgrade their hardware. I’ve been encountering that more and more in the workplace too, people using 5th/6th gen Intel quad cores refusing to upgrade... “it works fine”….
Will be upgrading to 9800X3D, motherboard incoming, graphics is covered for several years I think since the GTX780 ran Diablo4 as good as PS4.

But it is a funny quote, I personally can't play Elden Ring atm. But I have other stuff that works.
 

Thunder 57

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2007
3,023
4,668
136
Lol my god. On that change.org one he’s using an 11 year old CPU (despite the fact he calls it 9 years old) with a 4070 Ti. Imagine complaining about that in any other period in gaming history.

“Why can’t I run Halo on my 25 Mhz 486DX” is basically the same gap

“Why can’t I play Crysis on a 166 Mhz Pentium”

I know it’s partially a reflection of technology stagnation but I can’t understand people that can’t come to grips with the fact they need to upgrade their hardware. I’ve been encountering that more and more in the workplace too, people using 5th/6th gen Intel quad cores refusing to upgrade... “it works fine”….

"But it's a Xeon!". I've seen some morons buy Xeons for gaming. It'd be like buying Epyc for gaming. Stupid.
 
Reactions: igor_kavinski

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,591
4,408
136
"Good enough" if you are using the pittiful speakers inside your computer monitor, or Apple Airpods. Using high quality over-the-ear headphones, or a quality PA system and suddenly all that crappy design shines through like a fart in church .

That wont happen, because the best speakers or headphones have 1.5 to 2.5 orders of magnitude worst linearity than even the ultra lowish ALC887, very good speakers can barely do better than -40dB distorsion and quality headphones can reach -60dB or so, to compare with the ALC887 wich is, as the name suggest, at -87dB.

As for speakers that s what i use, along with a good quality cheapish amp, both bought used, 280€ for the pair of speakers and 20-30€ for the amp, and of course driven by an ALC887, lol.

 

Hans Gruber

Platinum Member
Dec 23, 2006
2,328
1,233
136
That wont happen, because the best speakers or headphones have 1.5 to 2.5 orders of magnitude worst linearity than even the ultra lowish ALC887, very good speakers can barely do better than -40dB distorsion and quality headphones can reach -60dB or so, to compare with the ALC887 wich is, as the name suggest, at -87dB.

As for speakers that s what i use, along with a good quality cheapish amp, both bought used, 280€ for the pair of speakers and 20-30€ for the amp, and of course driven by an ALC887, lol.

I still use my Logitech X-530 5.1 speakers that are at least 15 years old.
 

branch_suggestion

Senior member
Aug 4, 2023
401
892
96
I believe others have mentioned it, but the patent itself is about putting dies face to face and "sharing" at least 1 metal layer. The patent then goes on to show/describe a bunch of different ways they could use this, the picture Keplar showed is just one example where, it seems to me, that the bottom die is used for backside power delivery and potentially contains some circuitry as well (some analog and/or Vcache). Then, the 2 stacked dies are on top of an active interposer that would contain the memory controller and other IO. In the end, they could end up using all of it, or just parts, but obviously they want the patent to cover as much as possible.

Previously, AMD has done face to back stacking.
So Zen6 era packaging/uncore might be only one generation long.
Considering the previous era was 4 generations that would be impressive.
 

Joe NYC

Platinum Member
Jun 26, 2021
2,624
3,681
106
I think people want to see 20-25% better performance from the 9800x3d vs. 7800x3d.

I think that is setting unrealistic expectations. Under optimistic assumption that clock speed can go up 10% vs. 7800x3d, from 5.0 GHz to 5.5 GHz and again, optimistic gen on gen uplift of ~5%, the expected range would be 10% to 20%.

Which is quite respectable, given disappointing releases of Zen 5 vanilla and Arrow Lake.
 

Doug S

Platinum Member
Feb 8, 2020
2,836
4,821
136
I never understood that. If they wanted developers to adopt AVX, why disable it on the Pentium/Celeron back then? I don't think it's been an issue for awhile since they seemed to stop making anything less than an i3. Is "Intel Processor" still around?

Step 1: get developers to adopt AVX for the next version of their software
Step 2: sell inferior CPUs without AVX to consumers buying a cheap PC
Step 3: developers release new version of software that requires AVX
Step 4: consumers who bought the cheap PC can't run that software
Step 5: consumers buy a more expensive PC, and remember that lesson in the future to never go cheap again
Step 6: profit!

It takes longer than stealing underpants, but at least all the steps are clear.
 

coercitiv

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2014
6,727
14,499
136
It takes longer than stealing underpants, but at least all the steps are clear.
Except the first step proved harder than stealing developer's underpants

Personally I think this was just a case of beancounters being in charge of segmentation. I doubt they had a master plan, they were just looking for things to cut, things that could force an upsell on the more knowledgeable consumer segment (FOMO). They probably asked engineers if hey could cut AVX and only cared to hear "Yes" but did not listen for the "but ..."
 
Last edited:

naukkis

Senior member
Jun 5, 2002
930
808
136
Step 1: get developers to adopt AVX for the next version of their software
Step 2: sell inferior CPUs without AVX to consumers buying a cheap PC
Step 3: developers release new version of software that requires AVX
Step 4: consumers who bought the cheap PC can't run that software
Step 5: consumers buy a more expensive PC, and remember that lesson in the future to never go cheap again
Step 6: profit!

It takes longer than stealing underpants, but at least all the steps are clear.

Actually how it goes:

Step 1: developers release new version of software that requires AVX
Step 2: consumers who bought the cheap PC can't run that software
Step 3: Developer drops AVX support and newer tries to use it again.

Actually ARM did suffer that segmentation too - some fifteen-twenty years ago Neon was optional and nVidia didn't use it in first Tegras. So because of that one chip that did sold only handful of devices ARM software lacked Neon support for most programs about ten years. So any instruction extension that is to be supported needs to be mandatory to all devices sold.
 

OneEng2

Member
Sep 19, 2022
159
203
86
That wont happen, because the best speakers or headphones have 1.5 to 2.5 orders of magnitude worst linearity than even the ultra lowish ALC887, very good speakers can barely do better than -40dB distorsion and quality headphones can reach -60dB or so, to compare with the ALC887 wich is, as the name suggest, at -87dB.

As for speakers that s what i use, along with a good quality cheapish amp, both bought used, 280€ for the pair of speakers and 20-30€ for the amp, and of course driven by an ALC887, lol.

I can hear the difference easily on my $10,000.00 PA😁
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |