There is a finite amount of wealth available to. The larger point is the message it sends to society.
You fine and/or imprison Musk because the rule of law matters. It is either illegal to break campaign laws or it isn’t. It’s basically the same reason to fine/imprison Trump. Either attempting a coup is illegal or it isn’t.
Amazing how conservatives no longer care about democracy so long as they win.
Can we at least have trials where the judges presiding over each trial were not appointed by the person on trial?I would say that a trial is required before the fine or imprisonment, but I'm one of those crazy conservatives with the outlandish ideas.
I think that’s standard legalese. The government alleges person X violated the law, a jury determines if that’s true.The part that I am confused about, Shouldn't the Justice Department be able to say clearly if something violates the law or not? Musk either is or is not violating campaign law and the law should be written in such a way that this is crystal clear.
The Justice Department warned Elon Musk’s America PAC in recent days that his $1 million sweepstakes to registered voters in swing states may violate federal law
I think that’s standard legalese. The government alleges person X violated the law, a jury determines if that’s true.
LOL at any conservative in 2024 pretending to care about the rule of law. What an absolute joke.I would say that a trial is required before the fine or imprisonment, but I'm one of those crazy conservatives with the outlandish ideas.
The government often gives warnings to let people off easy.Shouldn't their be a indictment? Right now it reads like the Department of Justice is like, you maybe could be violating the law but we are not sure.
That's a surprisingly ignorant statement.LOL at any conservative in 2024 pretending to care about the rule of law. What an absolute joke.
Conservatives and the Republican party writ large have repeatedly demonstrated they don't care about the rule of law.That's a surprisingly ignorant statement.
It is funny how for years conservatives excused Trump by saying ‘well if he’s so bad then why hasn’t he been convicted of a crime?’ Then when he was they were just like ‘meh, I still don’t care’.LOL at any conservative in 2024 pretending to care about the rule of law. What an absolute joke.
That's a surprisingly ignorant statement.
If you care about the rule of law then surely you would never support someone who attempted a coup. Agree?That's a surprisingly ignorant statement.
Meaningless coming from a guy who cares about the rule of law and is also voting for the convicted criminal. You are a clown 🤡That's a surprisingly ignorant statement.
But he hasn't been convicted of that specific crime. We can't believe our own lying eyes and ears to form opinions. /sThe party's nominee is a man who tried to violently overthrow the republic and the results of a fair election. You don't get the benefit of the doubt after that.
Greenman/ He’s only been convicted of 34 crimes. If he were convicted of 35 that’s a problem /GreenmanBut he hasn't been convicted of that specific crime. We can't believe our own lying eyes and ears to form opinions. /s
FTFY. You appear to have misspelled accurate.That's a surprisingly accurate statement.
Come try out the new Tesla Deathcab. That will do wonders for Tesla stock.What a coincidence a guy who is pumping an ocean of cash into helping get Trump elected is first zeroing in on everything that regulates his companies as his interest in "efficiency".
That's a surprisingly ignorant statement.
I would say that a trial is required before the fine or imprisonment, but I'm one of those crazy conservatives with the outlandish ideas.
Merrick Garland has been spineless as a AG. Biden's been one of the best president's overall but appointing Garland was a huge miss by him.Shouldn't their be a indictment? Right now it reads like the Department of Justice is like, you maybe could be violating the law but we are not sure.
Merrick Garland has been spineless as a AG. Biden's been one of the best president's overall but appointing Garland was a huge miss by him.
It is when there is a direct payment to a specific group. No one ever offered to pay of my loans. No one ever offered me a $20k forgivable loan. Why the hell would I vote for that?
Hey now! We don't need any more liberals running around lose here in the south.
My favorite part of that is 'why would I vote for someone who forgives loans??' while adamantly refusing to answer why he is happily voting for someone who attempted a fucking coup.you want those things because you want to incentivize education, so that you and the rest of us don't have to spend our lives surrounded by fucking morons such as yourself.
it's the entire fucking point. You are the lead weight that is drowning the progress of humanity. We agreed that these were good things back in the 17th fucking century, yet here you are, still telling us the fucking water is fine to drink while your cows are shitting in it.