Certainly looks that way-- I wonder if its just going to officially list max boost clock at 5.2 and opportunistically boost to 5.3 if silicon allows (like most Zen 4 SKUs), or if they will list it at 5.3? Surely the packaging is complete and boxes are starting to hit the channel any day now.Another 5.3 1t 9800X3D GB6 run.
It does look like 9800X3D might end up having 5.3 1t boost.
ASUS System Product Name - Geekbench
Benchmark results for an ASUS System Product Name with an AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor.browser.geekbench.com
well on my 9950X this option disables SMT and CCD1 all together 🧐
Still wondering what this setting actually does.. I can see higher gaming performance with disabling CCD1/SMT, but higher memory bandwidth ?!
Normally the only way this happen is with faster FCLK 🤔
Afaik it sets REFI to some high value like 50000 and probably changes some other timings (so if you already have them tuned, it'd do nothing most probably)It turns on these options as well, but I have no idea what they do.
So as per the clue given by @tsamolotoff , give us screenshots of ZenTimings before and after.dont know what other evil things it does 🤣
Maybe AMD saw the pitiful gaming performance of Arrowlake and decided to scrap their plans to announce the 9800X3D?Isn't there supposed to be an announcement today regarding X3D?
Maybe they postponed it. They really must've been scared of the imaginary leprechaun they expected Intel to pull out of their behindsIsn't there supposed to be an announcement today regarding X3D?
Except as a mitigation to scheduling problems, what makes dual 3D cache more interesting? Doesn't it come with a clock speed reduction?I'm more interested in the 9900X3D and 9950X3D. Any word to the rumor that both chiplets will have the 3D cache this time around? This makes them hugely more interesting, especially the 9900X3D which would actually have a reason to exist now.
sureSo as per the clue given by @tsamolotoff , give us screenshots of ZenTimings before and after.
Please
I'm more interested in the 9900X3D and 9950X3D. Any word to the rumor that both chiplets will have the 3D cache this time around? This makes them hugely more interesting, especially the 9900X3D which would actually have a reason to exist now.
I guess, I'd be more interested if AMD found a way to have 3D cache variants dynamically disable 3D cache and clock higher automatically without requiring a restart. But I'm not sure that's possible.It will, but I think it's a good compromise for those of us that like high core counts but also like to game.
Well, it's probably a rumor or somebody's speculative guess too somewhere, but if you are talking about the news techPowerUp published based on BenchLife's articel based on some twitter post with a screenshot from bilibili, then that was purely TPU misreading the source.I'm more interested in the 9900X3D and 9950X3D. Any word to the rumor that both chiplets will have the 3D cache this time around? This makes them hugely more interesting, especially the 9900X3D which would actually have a reason to exist now.
Nice. Only source of the 83 point (.4%) difference would be Win 22H2 vs 24H2, and your ram having slightly lower latency being 32gb thus being able to run lower trfc. Interesting that 2000 fclk also appears not to be a hindrance vs 2200
What differences, if any, do these make to your mem read/write bandwidth and latency?sure
before (EXPO enabled, all timmings auto):
View attachment 110282
After (EXPO enabled, all timmings auto):
View attachment 110283
So as @tsamolotoff said, it sets tREFI to a higher value and tRFC to a lower value.. and thats it
btw @Hitman928, I set "EXPO/XMP high bandwidth support" to disabled, and it was not enabled after enabling this x3d turbo mode thing (and restarting) 🧐
Well AMD did hint that the 2 CCD V cache parts were “special” no?I very much doubt that. This feels very akin to the Zen 5 "32% IPC" rumor. People get excited only to be let down.
Almost similar boost clocks to vanilla parts?What else could make them special?
Almost similar boost clocks to vanilla parts?
Both higher quality and top binned CCDs?
Better thermal dissipation and even lower temps than vanilla parts?
6 GHz fmax (venturing into fantasyland here)?
Premium quality iOD allowing easy DDR5-9000 EXPO set and forget?
One V-cache die but covering both CCDs so both get access to the same frequently re-used data?
3nm CCDs?
One regular Zen 5 CCD with V-cache die and one Zen 5c CCD with 16 cores without V-cache?
World's first 10 core 3nm CCDs???
I'm pretty sure "high bandwidth support enabled" just rises tREFI, would explain the higher bandwidth
lower latency, higher mem write but lower read and copyWhat differences, if any, do these make to your mem read/write bandwidth and latency?