Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads

Page 635 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
702
632
106






As Hot Chips 34 starting this week, Intel will unveil technical information of upcoming Meteor Lake (MTL) and Arrow Lake (ARL), new generation platform after Raptor Lake. Both MTL and ARL represent new direction which Intel will move to multiple chiplets and combine as one SoC platform.

MTL also represents new compute tile that based on Intel 4 process which is based on EUV lithography, a first from Intel. Intel expects to ship MTL mobile SoC in 2023.

ARL will come after MTL so Intel should be shipping it in 2024, that is what Intel roadmap is telling us. ARL compute tile will be manufactured by Intel 20A process, a first from Intel to use GAA transistors called RibbonFET.



Comparison of upcoming Intel's U-series CPU: Core Ultra 100U, Lunar Lake and Panther Lake

ModelCode-NameDateTDPNodeTilesMain TileCPULP E-CoreLLCGPUXe-cores
Core Ultra 100UMeteor LakeQ4 202315 - 57 WIntel 4 + N5 + N64tCPU2P + 8E212 MBIntel Graphics4
?Lunar LakeQ4 202417 - 30 WN3B + N62CPU + GPU & IMC4P + 4E012 MBArc8
?Panther LakeQ1 2026 ??Intel 18A + N3E3CPU + MC4P + 8E4?Arc12



Comparison of die size of Each Tile of Meteor Lake, Arrow Lake, Lunar Lake and Panther Lake

Meteor LakeArrow Lake (N3B)Lunar LakePanther Lake
PlatformMobile H/U OnlyDesktop & Mobile H&HXMobile U OnlyMobile H
Process NodeIntel 4TSMC N3BTSMC N3BIntel 18A
DateQ4 2023Desktop-Q4-2024
H&HX-Q1-2025
Q4 2024Q1 2026 ?
Full Die6P + 8P8P + 16E4P + 4E4P + 8E
LLC24 MB36 MB ?12 MB?
tCPU66.48
tGPU44.45
SoC96.77
IOE44.45
Total252.15



Intel Core Ultra 100 - Meteor Lake



As mentioned by Tomshardware, TSMC will manufacture the I/O, SoC, and GPU tiles. That means Intel will manufacture only the CPU and Foveros tiles. (Notably, Intel calls the I/O tile an 'I/O Expander,' hence the IOE moniker.)



 

Attachments

  • PantherLake.png
    283.5 KB · Views: 24,014
  • LNL.png
    881.8 KB · Views: 25,501
Last edited:

511

Golden Member
Jul 12, 2024
1,038
895
106

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,701
2,863
136
There is something worth considering when comparing the 285K to the 14900K and that is cooling. Without a good sample, a fair bit of tuning, and a good cooling solution (think AIO 360) you are not going to get 5.5GHz all-core out of a 14900K under heavy load, which of course is when you need that frequency. A 14900K at stock settings from the VID table programmed into the average 14900K you're looking at around 5GHz and 225W.

If on the other hand a 285K at 225W can maintain 5.4GHz with air cooling then ARL now has the IPC and the frequency advantage over Raptor Lake. Yes, I understand that gaming presents a more bursty and less all-core intensive load so the 14900K will probably still be on top but if all you are looking for is productivity then ARL could be a good solution.

Then again there is that pesky 9950X that is as fast or faster in many applications and even more efficient.

My point is that in the real world the 285K looks to be a big step up. Again, Intel created all of this nonsense over the last few years by pushing Raptor into supernova energy territory.
 

mikk

Diamond Member
May 15, 2012
4,267
2,342
136
Cypress Cove: 18%
Willow Cove: 0%
Golden Cove: 19%
Redwood Cove: 0%(arguably minus)
Lion Cove: ~10%

Based on this trajectory Cougar Cove is the 0% shrink and Panther Cove is maybe 10%.

Do you know Exist is saying that 20A was so bad that it would have resulted in a worse Arrowlake?


It should be much easier for Panther/Coyote Cove just by using a next gen tile/fabric design. Even without any core related gains it could gain a few percent and for gaming much more. In the longer-term hopefully Cove will be shut down in favour of the Atom based unified core. Exist50 said there is at least one generation coming after Nova Lake with P+E cores (could be a tick from Nova Lake). I wonder if this is Razer Lake.
 

Ranulf

Platinum Member
Jul 18, 2001
2,575
1,728
136

controlflow

Member
Feb 17, 2015
188
325
136
Would like to see more reviews and testing on this type of thing:


Pretty sure scheduling is a significant problem in ARL for many kinds of light to medium workloads.
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,390
11,392
136
Would like to see more reviews and testing on this type of thing:


Pretty sure scheduling is a significant problem in ARL for many kinds of light to medium workloads.

Capframex on twitter isn't an unbiased source but heavily favors Intel, so if there is a config that will show Intel in a much better light, he would shout it from the roof tops. He tested multiple different core configurations and showed results, 6+8 seemed to give the best performance, for whatever reason, at least for Cyberpunk. The difference was less than 10% though and 8+0 gave the worst performance. He mentioned that he tested 1P+16E like the video but it didn't improve performance like shown in the video. From this and the other results we have, it doesn't look like a scheduling issue to me but probably an issue with the cache hierarchy / ring.




In regards to 1+16 config testing:


 

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,701
2,863
136
Would like to see more reviews and testing on this type of thing:


Pretty sure scheduling is a significant problem in ARL for many kinds of light to medium workloads.
Is there a way to translate this?
 

Thunder 57

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2007
3,079
4,873
136
I know I'm a bit late posting this as you posted this a few pages ago but I felt it was important enough and needed sharing. I was on TPU the other day reading about ARL and somebody in the comments posted this image. They certainly won the internet that day. Somebody commented saying as much.

And it's the same Pat who fired Raja Koduri thus putting Intel Graphics division years behind competition.

 

desrever

Senior member
Nov 6, 2021
218
600
106
Pat's definitely never at fault with anything that Intel does since he was only CEO for 3 years and he can't influence anything. AMD is in the rear view mirror and never again in the windshield, apple is just a lifestyle company and 5 nodes in 4 years is going great!

"Just wait for 18A" 🤡
 

cebri1

Senior member
Jun 13, 2019
373
405
136
Pat's definitely never at fault with anything that Intel does since he was only CEO for 3 years and he can't influence anything. AMD is in the rear view mirror and never again in the windshield, apple is just a lifestyle company and 5 nodes in 4 years is going great!

"Just wait for 18A" 🤡
How long does it take to design and validate a new architecture? How long does it take to design a new node? I dun't know, maybe you are just ignorant.
 

DavidC1

Golden Member
Dec 29, 2023
1,211
1,932
96
AFAIK 20A ARL-S samples had an FMax of 5.0 GHz.
That's horrible. So 20A is essentially at best a 10nm node used in Cannonlake.

Exist seems to be absolutely trashing Intel.
-Pat isn't MBA level bad, but not exactly the "savior" that people were looking for. Like overinvesting during inflated days.
-Based on results, even Skymont is far behind competition. ARM is just steamrolling over it. Lunarlake is just ok.
-Out of all the poop, the stinkiest one is P core and Lion Cove.
-Fab is way worse than Design. Split will essentially guarantee AMD/GF situation, with the fab part dying without customers in a few years.
-20A, regardless of high level advantages such as PowerVia and RibbonFET is complete trash. I have to agree. Execution differences can dwarf any high level differences.

Other guys say the problems aren't limited to Intel. AMD is seriously behind too.

He has been right on many things so far. It'll take something extraordinary to reverse the situation.
Arrow Lake is pre Pat, and yes it does. You are clearly ignorant.
Sorry but at this point in time, management under Gelsinger is partly at fault. Not fully, but it's not zero.

Remember this is now, before the effect of massive cuts, separation packages, and layoffs. Why did it happen? Because his team absolutely miscalculated in 2021 and over-invested. They should have cut share buybacks, dividends, and cut redundant parts of development(such as Hot Lots they like to quote) back then.

The future of x86 is still in doubt.
 

cebri1

Senior member
Jun 13, 2019
373
405
136


GNR on a 2019 roadmap. maybe it's Pat's fault too. But probably people in this forum can do a turnaround of a company with a broken culture and 140K people easily, maybe they should sign up for the job.

EDIT: Intel also signed two contracts with TSCM in 2020, and in Jan 2021, pre-Pat, made the order for N3B (Arrow's Lake Node). But yeah, it's 30 month since he took over... LOL
 
Last edited:
Jul 27, 2020
20,902
14,489
146
But probably people in this forum can do a turnaround of a company with a broken culture and 140K people easily, maybe they should sign up for the job.
I bet Elon Musk would be happy to take that job and then we would be left with Intel being run with a skeleton crew of 14k people aided by Elon's AI cloud...
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |