Question WASM benchmarks to test your CPU using Firefox (Justin's and pspdfkit)

lightmanek

Senior member

Feb 19, 2017

476

1,092

136

• Oct 27, 2024

• #51

MarkPost said:

My tuned 9950X / Firefox 131

View attachment 110394

View attachment 110395

Click to expand...

I'm at 507 for PSPDFKit on mine 9950X.
Tried the other test and was surprised to only be getting 180 Megarads ... then I realised I've turned off HT in BIOS last week 😅

 

Reactions: Tlh97, Gideon and igor_kavinski

lightmanek

Senior member

Feb 19, 2017

476

1,092

136

• Oct 27, 2024

• #52

lightmanek said:

I'm at 507 for PSPDFKit on mine 9950X.
Tried the other test and was surprised to only be getting 180 Megarads ... then I realised I've turned off HT in BIOS last week 😅

Click to expand...

Yes, it was your fault @igor_kavinski !!



Not bad for a daily I spent 20 minutes tweaking on old Windows 10 install (3rd place in ranking too!!).

PS. This must be one of the highest gains from HT I've seen! 180Megarads to 264Megarads with only difference being HT on/off! 47% gain!

 

Reactions: Tlh97, igor_kavinski and MarkPost

I

igor_kavinski

Lifer

Jul 27, 2020

20,898

14,487

146

• Oct 27, 2024

• #53

lightmanek said:

PS. This must be one of the highest gains from HT I've seen! 180Megarads to 264Megarads with only difference being HT on/off! 47% gain!

Click to expand...

Well if the browser for both runs was the same and there were no updates in between, wow!

 

lightmanek

Senior member

Feb 19, 2017

476

1,092

136

• Oct 27, 2024

• #54

igor_kavinski said:

Well if the browser for both runs was the same and there were no updates in between, wow!

Click to expand...

They were done one after another, just a restart and BIOS tweak in-between.
Other than that - identical enviroment.

 

Reactions: igor_kavinski

S

Sgraffite

Member

Jul 4, 2001

117

61

101

• Oct 27, 2024

• #55

7800X3D in ECO mode, which sets the power envelope to 65W

 

Reactions: Tlh97, igor_kavinski and lightmanek

S

Sgraffite

Member

Jul 4, 2001

117

61

101

• Oct 27, 2024

• #56

I ran it in Brave in the above post. Firefox seems very similar, fastest I got was 644 on PSPDFKit Wasm and 118.4 on Justin's WASM Web Benchmark.

 

Reactions: Tlh97, igor_kavinski and lightmanek

M

MarkPost

Senior member

Mar 1, 2017

346

720

136

• Oct 30, 2024

• #57

PSPDFKit sub 500 with mem @8200 (Firefox 131)

 

Reactions: Tlh97, poke01, lightmanek and 2 others

lightmanek

Senior member

Feb 19, 2017

476

1,092

136

• Oct 30, 2024

• #58

MarkPost said:

PSPDFKit sub 500 with mem @8200 (Firefox 131)

View attachment 110596

Click to expand...

I feel that 3DVcache Zen 5 will do quite well in this bench.

 

Reactions: Tlh97 and igor_kavinski

poke01

Platinum Member

Mar 8, 2022

2,581

3,409

106

• Oct 31, 2024

• #59

so is this benchmark still best on Firefox?

 

Reactions: Tlh97 and lightmanek

I

igor_kavinski

Lifer

Jul 27, 2020

20,898

14,487

146

• Oct 31, 2024

• #60

poke01 said:

so is this benchmark still best on Firefox?

Click to expand...

Think so, unless something has drastically changed in the last few months.

 

A

Aeonsim

Junior Member

May 10, 2020

13

42

91

• Oct 31, 2024

• #61

M2 Pro 12 Core:

With FFX 132.0
PSPDFKit Wasm Score: 673
Justins WASM: Completed in: 78.6s, Megarads: 70.70/s

With Safari:
PSPDFKit Wasm Score: 683
Justins WASM: Completed in: 60.9s, Megarads: 91.26/s

 

Reactions: Tlh97, lightmanek, igor_kavinski and 1 other person

I

igor_kavinski

Lifer

Jul 27, 2020

20,898

14,487

146

• Oct 31, 2024

• #62

Aeonsim said:

With FFX 132.0
Justins WASM: Completed in: 78.6s, Megarads: 70.70/s

With Safari:
Justins WASM: Completed in: 60.9s, Megarads: 91.26/s

Click to expand...

Big difference there in the MT performance. Guess the Firefox team hasn't optimized properly for Apple Silicon MT workloads.