Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads

Page 639 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
702
632
106






As Hot Chips 34 starting this week, Intel will unveil technical information of upcoming Meteor Lake (MTL) and Arrow Lake (ARL), new generation platform after Raptor Lake. Both MTL and ARL represent new direction which Intel will move to multiple chiplets and combine as one SoC platform.

MTL also represents new compute tile that based on Intel 4 process which is based on EUV lithography, a first from Intel. Intel expects to ship MTL mobile SoC in 2023.

ARL will come after MTL so Intel should be shipping it in 2024, that is what Intel roadmap is telling us. ARL compute tile will be manufactured by Intel 20A process, a first from Intel to use GAA transistors called RibbonFET.



Comparison of upcoming Intel's U-series CPU: Core Ultra 100U, Lunar Lake and Panther Lake

ModelCode-NameDateTDPNodeTilesMain TileCPULP E-CoreLLCGPUXe-cores
Core Ultra 100UMeteor LakeQ4 202315 - 57 WIntel 4 + N5 + N64tCPU2P + 8E212 MBIntel Graphics4
?Lunar LakeQ4 202417 - 30 WN3B + N62CPU + GPU & IMC4P + 4E012 MBArc8
?Panther LakeQ1 2026 ??Intel 18A + N3E3CPU + MC4P + 8E4?Arc12



Comparison of die size of Each Tile of Meteor Lake, Arrow Lake, Lunar Lake and Panther Lake

Meteor LakeArrow Lake (N3B)Lunar LakePanther Lake
PlatformMobile H/U OnlyDesktop & Mobile H&HXMobile U OnlyMobile H
Process NodeIntel 4TSMC N3BTSMC N3BIntel 18A
DateQ4 2023Desktop-Q4-2024
H&HX-Q1-2025
Q4 2024Q1 2026 ?
Full Die6P + 8P8P + 16E4P + 4E4P + 8E
LLC24 MB36 MB ?12 MB?
tCPU66.48
tGPU44.45
SoC96.77
IOE44.45
Total252.15



Intel Core Ultra 100 - Meteor Lake



As mentioned by Tomshardware, TSMC will manufacture the I/O, SoC, and GPU tiles. That means Intel will manufacture only the CPU and Foveros tiles. (Notably, Intel calls the I/O tile an 'I/O Expander,' hence the IOE moniker.)



 

Attachments

  • PantherLake.png
    283.5 KB · Views: 24,014
  • LNL.png
    881.8 KB · Views: 25,501
Last edited:

Jan Olšan

Senior member
Jan 12, 2017
427
776
136
FLAC encoding is multithreaded.

Does the MT encoder achieve the same compression ratio though? There was even a GPGPU encoder for FLAC once, but that was precisely the problem.

(Just run more instances at once...)
 

ondma

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2018
3,124
1,597
136
Here is my take on multithreaded performance. I too thought it was a terrible decision to remove HT from ARL. Now, I am not so sure. Still doesnt make sense to me, except maybe from a security point of view. However, MT performance of ARL in fine in the apps that it works well for. The fact that it does so well in some nT apps and badly in others makes me think there is some other bottleneck or flaw in the architecture. There does seem to be sufficient raw computing power there when it can be effectively utilized.

As to how important nT is to the average user, this is my point of view. I use my PC primarily for gaming, but also for some light video editing. Gaming performance is by far priority one. It doesnt really matter that much to me whether I can encode a video in 15 min or 20. I can just start the process and go do something else until it finishes. OTOH, there is nothing I can do if the cpu doesnt provide good gaming performance, other than perhaps changing settings. So I can easily work around limitations to nT performance, while I cant do that for gaming without sacrificing video quality.

Now obviously, depending on ones use case, the priority could vary. For sure if one is doing video editing professionally, it is essential to complete the job as quickly as possible, so the priority would be more to nT performance.
 
Reactions: Tlh97 and OneEng2

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,701
2,863
136
It is hard to argue against this:


and even harder when you consider this:


ARL is competitive but Zen 5 wins the game. Also, the apps where ARL wins by a good margin are probably enhanced by the NPU, which Zen 5 does not have.
 

Kocicak

Golden Member
Jan 17, 2019
1,148
1,211
136
Here is my take on multithreaded performance. I too thought it was a terrible decision to remove HT from ARL. Now, I am not so sure. ... It doesnt really matter that much to me whether I can encode a video in 15 min or 20. ...
With 24 core Intel CPU, the HT benefit is about 10%, if the app can really take advantage of it. So you are looking at 15 vs. 17 minutes.

The story is a little bit different with AMD CPUs, when all 16 cores can do multithreading, there the benefit is higher.
 

ondma

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2018
3,124
1,597
136
With 24 core Intel CPU, the HT benefit is about 10%, if the app can really take advantage of it. So you are looking at 15 vs. 17 minutes.

The story is a little bit different with AMD CPUs, when all 16 cores can do multithreading, there the benefit is higher.
Of course, the 15 vs 20 min was just an off the cuff number to make my point. Losing HT probably will hurt more on lower end of the stack CPUs though, since they have fewer E cores. Something I didnt mention though, is that whatever reason Intel used to decide to remove HT seems like an indication of the fact that the P core is a poor design, since AMD uses it on all cores and still is more efficient.
 

ondma

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2018
3,124
1,597
136
It is hard to argue against this:
View attachment 110465

and even harder when you consider this:
View attachment 110466

ARL is competitive but Zen 5 wins the game. Also, the apps where ARL wins by a good margin are probably enhanced by the NPU, which Zen 5 does not have.
Actually, that makes ARL look better than I thought it would. If you remove the -68% outlier, ARL is nearly equal in applications, and competitive in power usage. The big problem is the horrible and inconsistent gaming performance.
 

desrever

Senior member
Nov 6, 2021
218
600
106
Actually, that makes ARL look better than I thought it would. If you remove the -68% outlier, ARL is nearly equal in applications, and competitive in power usage. The big problem is the horrible and inconsistent gaming performance.
Remove the AI bullshit benchmarks in there and its slower in 90% of applications. Why would you remove photoshop as an outlier when it is a legit application?
 

ondma

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2018
3,124
1,597
136
Remove the AI bullshit benchmarks in there and its slower in 90% of applications. Why would you remove photoshop as an outlier when it is a legit application?
Of course, you can remove any benchmarks you want. You could look at it the other way and say ARL is more "future proof" because it utilizes AI. My point simply was that the benchmark is clearly an outlier.
 

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,701
2,863
136
Let's talk use cases. I have two main rigs. My 14900K desktop and my old 8250u Skylake MS Surface 2, which is overmatched for much of what I do.

Here are the applications and operations that when I do them on my laptop I wish I was on the desktop. I am going to buy a new a new laptop soon but really want a Surface Laptop with Lunar Lake so that is why I haven't purchased already.

PureRaw for RAW photo conversion. I can batch this on either system but it painful low without a GPU. 15 seconds per photo with ARC750 desktop, 264 seconds per photo with Intel Graphics 620 in the Surface Laptop 2. That is more than an order of magnitude.

Magix Vegas Pro 21 for video editing/encoding. There are two parts to this timeline preview and rendering/encoding a project. I need the strong P cores and my ARC750 to make editing creatively possible and not painful. It is painful on my laptop. Encoding is also much faster on the desktop but not impossible on the laptop as I can run it overnight if needed. Encoding using Voukoder in Vegas will load up the P cores to 90%+ and the E's to around 60%. Encoding two projects simultaneously (2 Vegas instances open) will load all cores to 100%. It's rare that I need to do that.

Photoshop. I can do some photoshop work on my laptop but it is cumbersome and I'm waiting too much.

Presonus Studio One. Multitrack recording is no problem on the laptop as most of the heavy lifting is done by the interface. The P cores are needed for mixing when the plug-ins get heavy.

Topaz Photo AI - Relies heavily on both GPU and some CPU. I can process a photo or two in a pinch on the laptop but it's quite the painful process.

Topaz Video AI - Forget about it on the laptop. No way. It's quite taxing on the desktop with the ARC750 as well but doable.

Time Xpress. This is payroll software I use for work. Running a report takes a long time, like 5 or 10 minutes on the laptop. Again, doable, but there are things I could be doing with this time.

Opening CorelDraw, MS Phone Link, and a few others I can't remember right now seem to take forever on the laptop. Of course this is more a slow memory/SSD/storage system issue rather than a compute one I would think.
 
Jul 27, 2020
20,917
14,492
146
PureRaw for RAW photo conversion. I can batch this on either system but it painful low without a GPU. 15 seconds per photo with ARC750 desktop, 264 seconds per photo with Intel Graphics 620 in the Surface Laptop 2. That is more than an order of magnitude.

Magix Vegas Pro 21 for video editing/encoding. There are two parts to this timeline preview and rendering/encoding a project. I need the strong P cores and my ARC750 to make editing creatively possible and not painful. It is painful on my laptop. Encoding is also much faster on the desktop but not impossible on the laptop as I can run it overnight if needed. Encoding using Voukoder in Vegas will load up the P cores to 90%+ and the E's to around 60%. Encoding two projects simultaneously (2 Vegas instances open) will load all cores to 100%. It's rare that I need to do that.

Photoshop. I can do some photoshop work on my laptop but it is cumbersome and I'm waiting too much.

Topaz Photo AI - Relies heavily on both GPU and some CPU. I can process a photo or two in a pinch on the laptop but it's quite the painful process.

Topaz Video AI - Forget about it on the laptop. No way. It's quite taxing on the desktop with the ARC750 as well but doable.
These may get a higher uplift with a Geforce GPU than a CPU upgrade.
 
Reactions: Hulk
Jul 27, 2020
20,917
14,492
146

285K setting new records in some of Igor's professional workstation benchmarks.

Just imagine how invincible it could've been in these same benchmarks with an extra 15 to 30% "free" HT performance.

I think the current CEO has some sort of curse following him around which is why he is so afraid of the Devil and keeps tweeting Bible verses. He hasn't had a single slam dunk since he joined Intel.
 

GTracing

Member
Aug 6, 2021
168
396
106

285K setting new records in some of Igor's professional workstation benchmarks.

Just imagine how invincible it could've been in these same benchmarks with an extra 15 to 30% "free" HT performance.

I think the current CEO has some sort of curse following him around which is why he is so afraid of the Devil and keeps tweeting Bible verses. He hasn't had a single slam dunk since he joined Intel.
What's your issue with Pat? Did he poison your dog or something?
 

Tup3x

Golden Member
Dec 31, 2016
1,117
1,146
136
FLAC encoding is multithreaded.

LibFLAC is not multithreaded. Pretty much all multithreaded audio encoders are more or less experimental. In any case, it makes more sense to just convert multiple tracks parallel. You can basically treat is at as pure single threaded operation in 99% of software out there that people would use.
 

SiliconFly

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2023
1,651
996
96

285K setting new records in some of Igor's professional workstation benchmarks.

Just imagine how invincible it could've been in these same benchmarks with an extra 15 to 30% "free" HT performance.

I think the current CEO has some sort of curse following him around which is why he is so afraid of the Devil and keeps tweeting Bible verses. He hasn't had a single slam dunk since he joined Intel.
Lunar Lake is a slam dunk.

In fact their best in last ~10 years or so.

Pat has been a terrible CEO so far, why are you defending him? Do you personally know him or something?
He's done a better job than his predecessors. He's no superman. But not a wimp either.
 

MS_AT

Senior member
Jul 15, 2024
365
798
96
ARL is competitive but Zen 5 wins the game. Also, the apps where ARL wins by a good margin are probably enhanced by the NPU, which Zen 5 does not have.
I doubt any of the benchmarks used by TPU are NPU enabled and NPU in ArrowLake is nothing to write home about.
With 24 core Intel CPU, the HT benefit is about 10%, if the app can really take advantage of it. So you are looking at 15 vs. 17 minutes.
You are estimating HT gain of LionCove based on RaptorCove and Lion is noticeably wider core than Raptor. It stands to reason it might have higher HT uplift than Raptor, since more of the core is likely to sit idle, but we will never know.
Just imagine how invincible it could've been in these same benchmarks with an extra 15 to 30% "free" HT performance.
If it was free they would have implemented it
 

desrever

Senior member
Nov 6, 2021
218
600
106
He's done a better job than his predecessors. He's no superman. But not a wimp either.
By what metric? Intel is just as bad now if not worse off than under any previous CEO. Their future is also worse than ever. Pat is the worst CEO in Intel history at this point since he is driving the company to bankruptcy. Intel stock in down >60% since he took over.

I'm not defending him? I'm just tired of reading comment after comment of armchair CEOs bashing him for every reason they can think of.
Because the CEO is responsible for the company and its in their job description? Why does anyone need to be an "armchair CEO" to give criticism?
 
Reactions: Tlh97

adroc_thurston

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2023
3,793
5,489
96
Intel is just as bad now if not worse off than under any previous CEO
Well, no, the current crop of products wasn't made under his tenure. Pat will be judged by foundry efforts and stuff like Unified Core in the end.
Pat is the worst CEO in Intel history at this point since he is driving the company to bankruptcy. Intel stock in down >60% since he took over.
They're just 2012-era AMD. They may recover.
 

MoistOintment

Member
Jul 31, 2024
59
107
66
By what metric? Intel is just as bad now if not worse off than under any previous CEO. Their future is also worse than ever. Pat is the worst CEO in Intel history at this point since he is driving the company to bankruptcy. Intel stock in down >60% since he took over.


Because the CEO is responsible for the company and its in their job description? Why does anyone need to be an "armchair CEO" to give criticism?

But how much of that specifically due to decisions he made? The biggest damage he did to the stock was cutting the dividends, even though that's what was needed for the company. Lip-Bu Tan resigned because Pat was laying off only 15% of the workforce - he wanted much bigger layoffs. MTL/ARL, SPR, RPL - all inherited messes that had the wheels in motion already.

Realistically, what choices would you have done differently?

I like that one of the first things he did was cancel stock buybacks. That he's forcing fab front and center with separate reporting with industry standard PDKs and tooling. With Intel design required to use industry standard designs that are foundry portable. I like the renewed focused on mobile, even if it hurts me personally due to the lack of focus on desktop.

Intel as a company has a lot of missteps due to past errors: Entering AI and dGPU too late. Adopting EUV too late. 10nm failures with no backup plan. The mess that is MTL/ARL - all inherited messes that he's trying to navigate through the consequences of.

I'm bullish on Intel's long term future and bearish on their short term. I think he's laying a lot of important ground work success that the next CEO will get credit for.
 

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,701
2,863
136

285K setting new records in some of Igor's professional workstation benchmarks.

Just imagine how invincible it could've been in these same benchmarks with an extra 15 to 30% "free" HT performance.

I think the current CEO has some sort of curse following him around which is why he is so afraid of the Devil and keeps tweeting Bible verses. He hasn't had a single slam dunk since he joined Intel.
Free? Aren't extra transistors associated with HT? Extra transistors mean additional die area, hot spots, and potentially reduced frequency, which is the point of the P cores.

Furthermore you are talking about extra performance from the 8 P cores so let's make sure we are throwing around numbers that make sense. Before doing calculations I have a feeling 15 to 30% is wildly optimistic consider the fact that Skymont carries the weight of the MT performance for ARL.

Assuming 5.4GHz could be maintained when HT is actually improving P cores performance by 35%, which I doubt without serious cooling, then 35% additional for the 8P cores would result in +14% overall performance in CB R24, which is higher than your low estimate and probably the best case for such a situation.

The reality of the situation as explained to us by the stupid Intel engineers, which all of us are smarter than, and the really stupid CEO, who any of us could replace tonight and we could turn the company around by next week, is that anything that hinders ST performance is illogical and a detriment to the ARL design philosophy. You see thermal considerations and transistor budget are a real thing for those dumb engineers. Of course we know better but they are stuck in their old ways I guess.
 

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,701
2,863
136
These may get a higher uplift with a Geforce GPU than a CPU upgrade.
Of course that is true. But the reality is that on average it takes me longer than 15 seconds to open, edit, and save a photo in PS so the PureRaw conversions are working faster in the background than I am in the foreground. There is a point where fast enough is fast enough for me.
 
Reactions: igor_kavinski
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |