Discussion Cinebench 2024 Released

Det0x · Dec 28, 2023

Direct die 7950X @ large custom watercooling
2209mhz FCLK
8152MT/s @ 32-45-37-45-84

CPU Score = 2531

Timur Born · Dec 29, 2023

Power usage and noise to reach that score?

Shmee · Dec 29, 2023

Score from my 5800X3D. Pretty close to the other Zen 3 8 cores CPUs, both the 5800X reference and the 5700X tested by @DAPUNISHER. I am running 3200 MT/s on my RAM, curious if going higher would make a difference...of course you also have to consider different cooling solutions among systems.

Det0x · Dec 29, 2023

Timur Born said:
Power usage and noise to reach that score?

About same powerdraw as in Cinebench R23..

So not too shabby @ 318w peak when running delidded on the mycro direct die block

Cooling

Timur Born · Dec 29, 2023

Det0x said:
About same powerdraw as in Cinebench R23..

Cinebench 24, multi and single core on undervolted 13900K (60x 1-core, 55x all-core):

CB23 hits my 253 W power-limit, so CB24 uses less power here. Your CB23 score is 7.5% higher for 25% higher max wattage, but I assume your average power is lower!? If not then your CB24 score is 8.5% higher for about 30% higher wattage.

Det0x · Dec 29, 2023

Timur Born said:
Cinebench 24, multi and single core on undervolted 13900K (60x 1-core, 55x all-core):

View attachment 91149 View attachment 91150

CB23 hits my 253 W power-limit, so CB24 uses less power here. Your CB23 score is 7.5% higher for 25% higher max wattage, but I assume your average power is lower!? If not then your CB24 score is 8.5% higher for about 30% higher wattage.

So i'm not quite sure what your trying to prove/achieve here ?

But since your so interested in power draw and undervolting i did a new run with hwinfo open, at the same performance target as you. (2333points)
Turns out i need 181w peak / 176w average package power for this.

Screenshot when finished with the run:

Are we done ?

Timur Born · Dec 29, 2023

Yes, the Ryzen should be more efficient than the Intel part for Cinebench type of load, thanks for providing the numbers for everyone to compare. Overclocking these CPUs further eats a lot of power, though, because they come long past the point of diminishing returns out of the box.

MarkPost · Tuesday at 10:15 PM

I have tested my 9950X with different configurations:

9950X @Stock (200W PPT) DDR5 5600

9950X @Stock (200W PPT) DDR5 6400

9950X @PBO tuned 180W PPT DDR5 6400

9950X @PBO tuned 200W PPT DDR5 6400

9950X @PBO tuned 230W PPT DDR5 6400

Graph with the scores:

First conclusion (already known anyways): memory frequency has a clear measurable impact in CB 2024 (~6% from 5600 to 6400, in my testing)
Second conclusion: yeah, Zen 5 is really efficient

Det0x · Wednesday at 2:54 AM

9950X (ES) maxed out on custom watercooling

Cinebench R23 MT = 50k
(ST = 2394)

Cinebench R24 MT = 2810
(ST = 149 i think it was)

Det0x · Wednesday at 2:57 AM

And a more power efficient Cinebench R23 MT run

49k @ 250w PPT

MarkPost · Wednesday at 8:46 PM

wow

Mine "only" reaches a score of ~47300 @250W in CB R23

My custom WC is a puppy compared to yours though😅

Discussion Cinebench 2024 Released

Det0x

Golden Member

Timur Born

Senior member

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member

Det0x

Golden Member

Timur Born

Senior member

Det0x

Golden Member

Timur Born

Senior member

MarkPost

Senior member

Det0x

Golden Member

Det0x

Golden Member

MarkPost

Senior member

TRENDING THREADS