Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads

Page 649 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
700
615
106






As Hot Chips 34 starting this week, Intel will unveil technical information of upcoming Meteor Lake (MTL) and Arrow Lake (ARL), new generation platform after Raptor Lake. Both MTL and ARL represent new direction which Intel will move to multiple chiplets and combine as one SoC platform.

MTL also represents new compute tile that based on Intel 4 process which is based on EUV lithography, a first from Intel. Intel expects to ship MTL mobile SoC in 2023.

ARL will come after MTL so Intel should be shipping it in 2024, that is what Intel roadmap is telling us. ARL compute tile will be manufactured by Intel 20A process, a first from Intel to use GAA transistors called RibbonFET.



Comparison of upcoming Intel's U-series CPU: Core Ultra 100U, Lunar Lake and Panther Lake

ModelCode-NameDateTDPNodeTilesMain TileCPULP E-CoreLLCGPUXe-cores
Core Ultra 100UMeteor LakeQ4 202315 - 57 WIntel 4 + N5 + N64tCPU2P + 8E212 MBIntel Graphics4
?Lunar LakeQ4 202417 - 30 WN3B + N62CPU + GPU & IMC4P + 4E012 MBArc8
?Panther LakeQ1 2026 ??Intel 18A + N3E3CPU + MC4P + 8E4?Arc12



Comparison of die size of Each Tile of Meteor Lake, Arrow Lake, Lunar Lake and Panther Lake

Meteor LakeArrow Lake (N3B)Lunar LakePanther Lake
PlatformMobile H/U OnlyDesktop & Mobile H&HXMobile U OnlyMobile H
Process NodeIntel 4TSMC N3BTSMC N3BIntel 18A
DateQ4 2023Desktop-Q4-2024
H&HX-Q1-2025
Q4 2024Q1 2026 ?
Full Die6P + 8P8P + 16E4P + 4E4P + 8E
LLC24 MB36 MB ?12 MB?
tCPU66.48
tGPU44.45
SoC96.77
IOE44.45
Total252.15



Intel Core Ultra 100 - Meteor Lake



As mentioned by Tomshardware, TSMC will manufacture the I/O, SoC, and GPU tiles. That means Intel will manufacture only the CPU and Foveros tiles. (Notably, Intel calls the I/O tile an 'I/O Expander,' hence the IOE moniker.)



 

Attachments

  • PantherLake.png
    283.5 KB · Views: 24,009
  • LNL.png
    881.8 KB · Views: 25,496
Last edited:

cannedlake240

Member
Jul 4, 2024
159
94
61
Hope they release Arrow Lake with bugs fixed on 18A in six months and max boost 6 GHz to get consumer and investor confidence back. They can just increment the model numbers by 5 like 250K, 270K and 290K.
Sadly no company, let alone intel can design and ship in 6 months. That's what Nova lake is, fixed memory latency, new cores potential stacked L3 cache, but that'll take another 2 years
 

LightningZ71

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2017
1,827
2,203
136
Very good work, but this part misses the plot. Averaging the HT benefit across active threads doesn't make much sense. In reality, almost all situations that benefit from HT will be all-core loads. So, ARL could have had up to 13.5% more multi-core performance.
Going from statements for earlier implementations of HT, it adds around 5% to the core size. With 4.53 mm² for Lion Cove, that's just +1.812 mm² for 8 P-cores. or a bit more than one Skymont E-core. The Compute tile would have been just 1.6% bigger, for up to 13.5% more performance. Performance-wise, that should still have been a no-brainer.

The reasons could be in unified core architecture across Lunar and Arrow Lake, and in preparation for unifying P- and E-cores in upcoming generations.
Do you know what ALSO would have increase MT performance by a MUCH greater degree without sacrificing ANY ST performance while costing around the same increase in die space?

Going from 8/16-24 to 6/24-30. 6 P cores and 24 E cores. That would give you significantly more MT performance as Skymont cores are a much bigger increase in throughput than HT threads on a P core. You'd have gotten 6 of those in addition to the 2 that would effectively replace the missing P cores. And remember, those 2 HT threads share that P core, so it would become effectively 2 cores with 60-65% of the performance of one P core.

There's no world where adding footprint to the existing P cores for HT is better than replacing two P cores with E core clusters.
 

Kepler_L2

Senior member
Sep 6, 2020
565
2,321
136
ARL is a stumble of sorts. The question is if it is a stumble on the way down or the way up. I wonder if there is a sense of excitement at Intel, young and old really smart people passionate to do great things on the edge of current technology? Or it is just full of people grinding away and feeling like cogs in a machine that doesn't care about them with a room full of executives figuring out how to get the remaining gold off of the ship before it sinks?
Anecdotal but from I have heard old veterans at Intel are retiring early and younger engineers are jumping ship to AMD/NVIDIA/Apple/Qualcomm.
 
Reactions: Elfear

Thunder 57

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2007
3,024
4,670
136
The Intel employees on reddit talk about all of the experienced and talented taking the buyouts or going through the motions while they actively look for work elsewhere. Rock bottom morale. How the pay was not competitive when they took the job, but the perks (most of which have been taken away) were what made it worth working there.

A few that thought they were safe because they work at the Hillsboro campus. They were unfortunately quite wrong. That was 4-8 weeks ago I read those posts on r/Intel, r/hardware, and maybe one or 2 other subs.

It's pretty bad when the free fruit perk is taken away.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
29,719
24,964
146
It's pretty bad when the free fruit perk is taken away.
They had free coffee and snacks bar. One employee said he could walk 2 minutes from his desk, grab some coffee and snacks, and go back to his workflow recharged. He was obviously depressed they took that from him.
Im just gonna leave this here (tested with 7900xtx):
View attachment 110667
We need to see the testing methodology. AMD have inflated numbers on everything of late, so can't trust AMDumb marketing. I speculated already they simply used 24H2, but the difference would probably be even larger?
 

moinmoin

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2017
5,094
8,098
136
we can expect more nonsense like this from TSMC. They're just attacking the weakest link in the chain.
Keep in mind that Morris Chang does not equal TSMC. While he is the founder and outspoken, he hasn't been in an official position at TSMC since 2018. He may still be close to the leadership there, but that doesn't make him TSMC's official mouthpiece. Furthermore he's a billionaire and 93 years old, so chances are he's living in an alternate dimension far from everyday reality of commoners anyway. 😜
 

Meteor Late

Member
Dec 15, 2023
48
45
51
Im just gonna leave this here (tested with 7900xtx):
View attachment 110667

In HWU testing, 7800X3D is already 20% faster than 285K, though, admittedly with RTX 4090. So unless the testing is radically different, this is really not good news for 9800X3D if these numbers are true. Many people expect like 10% gaming delta on average between 7800X3D and 9800X3D and that's probably not going to happen.
 
Reactions: rosetta

gdansk

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2011
3,110
4,826
136
In HWU testing, 7800X3D is already 20% faster than 285K, though, admittedly with RTX 4090. So unless the testing is radically different, this is really not good news for 9800X3D if these numbers are true.
Different games, different GPUs. I'm not sure it is comparable. It should be 4% more frequency with the Zen 5% boost so about 8% more seems about right.
 
Reactions: Joe NYC

Meteor Late

Member
Dec 15, 2023
48
45
51
Different games, different GPUs. I'm not sure it is comparable. It should be 4% more frequency with the Zen 5% boost so about 8% more seems about right.

Zen 5 in games was more like 3% not 5% on average. And the frequency increase doesn't scale in many games, because they are more cache and memory bound. So most likely we will have a true Zen5% instead of the current Zen5(3)%.
 

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,611
2,645
136
Anecdotal but from I have heard old veterans at Intel are retiring early and younger engineers are jumping ship to AMD/NVIDIA/Apple/Qualcomm.
Not good.

In the '80's when Chrysler was failing my dad bought one Chysler New Yorker after another, I think 3 of them. They were terrible but he wanted to support the Chrysler that he knew growing up. Unfortunately that company didn't exist.

I'm pretty sure that's why I keep buying Intel. My heart remembers the Intel from growing up but my brain is well aware that company is gone.
 

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,611
2,645
136
Nutty noob idea.

Instead of going to TMSC with ARL I wonder if Intel considered a giant monolithic ARL core on Intel 7? If clocks were lower efficiency would have been okay and memory issues might be mitigated. Expense of the giant core possibily offset by staying with in-house fabs? Problem is such a beast would be admitting out in the open that they are beat with process, which is of course is what they did by going hybrid but found a way to hide that fact with the hybrid architecture.

Now I really know why Intel kept cranking up the clock on Raptor and why we had a Raptor Refresh. They are obviously tapped out of cutting edge tech that outperforms the competition in the real world, not just in Intel charts. Not taped out, tapped out.
 

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,611
2,645
136
Would this be a decent option if I were to switch teams? I'm staying with mATX due to the fact that I have a case I really like that fits under my desk.

You see, my 1.3V underclock on my 14900K is not stable anymore so I downloaded the Intel microcode BIOS update. Yeah it's stable now but taking in quite a lot of volts and I've lost 300-400MHz at the same 200W I used to run at.
I think I'm done with Raptor Lake. I want to try a 9950X.

Probably throw a 7800XT or 4700 GPU in there as well. I don't game much but like the GPU power for other tasks.
 

Saylick

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2012
3,605
8,075
136
Nutty noob idea.

Instead of going to TMSC with ARL I wonder if Intel considered a giant monolithic ARL core on Intel 7? If clocks were lower efficiency would have been okay and memory issues might be mitigated. Expense of the giant core possibily offset by staying with in-house fabs? Problem is such a beast would be admitting out in the open that they are beat with process, which is of course is what they did by going hybrid but found a way to hide that fact with the hybrid architecture.

Now I really know why Intel kept cranking up the clock on Raptor and why we had a Raptor Refresh. They are obviously tapped out of cutting edge tech that outperforms the competition in the real world, not just in Intel charts. Not taped out, tapped out.
intel 7 is probably a little too old, but they maybe could’ve used Intel 3?
 

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,611
2,645
136
intel 7 is probably a little too old, but they maybe could’ve used Intel 3?
That's true. Just thinking they have the high clocks and probably good yields in Intel 7.
Honestly even Raptor Cove paired with Skymont on monolithic might have been a better option than ARL as we have it now. ST would have remained the same but MT would have gone through the roof with just a little larger die area.
 
Jul 27, 2020
20,420
14,090
146
I don't mind that mobo.

For RAM, I think this is better: https://www.gskill.com/product/165/390/1693903297/F5-6400J3239F24GX2-TZ5NRW
 

cannedlake240

Member
Jul 4, 2024
159
94
61
That's true. Just thinking they have the high clocks and probably good yields in Intel 7.
Honestly even Raptor Cove paired with Skymont on monolithic might have been a better option than ARL as we have it now. ST would have remained the same but MT would have gone through the roof with just a little larger die area.
Redwood, raptor aren't node portable
 
Reactions: GTracing
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |