Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)

Page 868 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

maddie

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2010
4,932
5,075
136
Wow. I have to admit, it has been a while since I have seen a forum post as wrong headed as this...

The non-bold parts are only true for the exact conditions and mix of logic that TSMC quotes the metrics for.

The belief that clock speed of an entire superscalar processor pipeline is dependent ONLY on the performance of the transistors used in the pipeline shows a lack of understanding of how modern CPU's work.

Also, the power assumption is flawed (although perhaps not as off-base as the other assumptions) as well in that it depends on the mix of transistors in the CPU design.
Its actually a nonsensical statement.

"That's wrong. If you run two identical processors on different processes on the 5nm node. Clock for clock the performance on N4P will be 11% better on average than on N5. That means if you run a 7800x3d @ 1.2v and 4ghz. The N4P at the same clock and voltage would perform 11% better than on N5 with identical clocks and voltage. The efficiency gains means at the same voltage it would take eg. 10% less power to produce the same result. The increased clocks are primarily due to silicon and or voltage.

Fun fact. AMD actually wanted the Zen 4 CPU's on N5P but they had to settle for N5."



AFAIK, identical circuits at the same clock will have the same performance (IPC) on different nodes but power will be different.
 

biostud

Lifer
Feb 27, 2003
18,846
5,706
136
I don't think they will have two CCDs with 3D vcache but I'm not sure why.

They could charge even more if they both had cache, as those buying with one cache 9950X3D would most likely also be willing to pay $150 more to avoid the hazzle with games switching to the wrong CCD. Also those who have workloads that benefits from the cache, can buy this model. And the AM5 EPYC would also be more interesting as a homogeneous CPUS I would think.

Or they could simply launch a third option besides the two regular, 9950X3D2.
 

Jan Olšan

Senior member
Jan 12, 2017
427
776
136
That's what I was thinking. Sounds like one of those things that started as a baseless rumor and has been repeated so much people think it is essentially fact.
If the source is techpowerup, it's worse - it was misunderstanding somebody's else article/posting. Of course, it could happen regardless in a "broken clock happened to be right" manner, but the rumors themselves have zero weight if they were purely misunderstanding.
 

moinmoin

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2017
5,145
8,226
136
Those images do not show the TSVs, "on the top of the die". By definition a TSV cannot be on the top of a die, it has to go through the backside. It can go through the whole die, but not be on the top.
That to me sounds like mincing words, but I'm not @dr1337 so please clear up the exact wording and meaning with them. That's not what I'm interested in at all.

What I see is an actual die photo taken by Fritzchens Fritz which shows those end points of TSVs both for power and data that would need a die on top of them to be useful. As is they essentially end in nowhere. As the X3D die is now on the other side there doesn't seem to be any obvious use for them anymore. The question is: What was the intended use for them? Official interviews mention that moving the X3D die to the backside was a long term goal with Zen 5. In that regard it wouldn't make sense to still include TSVs for an X3D die on the frontside as well, would it?
 

Joe NYC

Platinum Member
Jun 26, 2021
2,672
3,839
106
That to me sounds like mincing words, but I'm not @dr1337 so please clear up the exact wording and meaning with them. That's not what I'm interested in at all.

What I see is an actual die photo taken by Fritzchens Fritz which shows those end points of TSVs both for power and data that would need a die on top of them to be useful. As is they essentially end in nowhere. As the X3D die is now on the other side there doesn't seem to be any obvious use for them anymore. The question is: What was the intended use for them? Official interviews mention that moving the X3D die to the backside was a long term goal with Zen 5. In that regard it wouldn't make sense to still include TSVs for an X3D die on the frontside as well, would it?

I am wondering if these are just some transistors for signal propagation
 
Reactions: lightmanek

Josh128

Senior member
Oct 14, 2022
511
865
106
Apparently so. Good luck to anyone trying to get an X3D for under $500 in the first couple months of release. They will be snapped up and scalped so fast its going to make heads spin.
 
Reactions: lightmanek

gdansk

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2011
3,276
5,186
136
Apparently so. Good luck to anyone trying to get an X3D for under $500 in the first couple months of release. They will be snapped up and scalped so fast its going to make heads spin.
I don't think there's much room for scalping when there is the 7800X3D. I know the stock has dried up but there's those weirdos who will flip their 7800X3D and buy a 9800X3D.

Speaking of which, anyone want a 7800X3D? 🤣
 

Hans de Vries

Senior member
May 2, 2008
340
1,156
136
www.chip-architect.com
I think (among others) he's referring to this die shot analysis:

Image in the quote:

The Zen 5 CCD die isn't thinned anymore like Zen 3/4 to accommodate the X3D V-cache.

Thus: There are no TSV's going through the entire Zen 5 CCD, and they would only end up at the thermal paste / heath-sink anyway.





If these structures seen on the Zen 5 CCD have anything to do with TSV's, then they are, like the yellow structures below, for receiving the TSV's (red) that go through the Cache die.

The Zen 5 CCD is on top here and facing down: (Ignore the bottom right detail which shows the previous version)

 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,390
11,392
136
That to me sounds like mincing words, but I'm not @dr1337 so please clear up the exact wording and meaning with them. That's not what I'm interested in at all.

What I see is an actual die photo taken by Fritzchens Fritz which shows those end points of TSVs both for power and data that would need a die on top of them to be useful. As is they essentially end in nowhere. As the X3D die is now on the other side there doesn't seem to be any obvious use for them anymore. The question is: What was the intended use for them? Official interviews mention that moving the X3D die to the backside was a long term goal with Zen 5. In that regard it wouldn't make sense to still include TSVs for an X3D die on the frontside as well, would it?

It's not mincing words when there is a technical difference between them. That's why I asked for clarification as to what exactly is meant. Your question about the TSVs is what I've been wondering for several posts now, even when the CCD was just rumored to be on top. If it is on top and flip-chip, why are there TSVs in the CCD that go nowhere?

The Zen 5 CCD die isn't thinned anymore like Zen 3/4 to accommodate the X3D V-cache.

Thus: There are no TSV's going through the entire Zen 5 CCD, and they would only end up at the thermal paste / heath-sink anyway.


View attachment 110804


If these structures seen on the Zen 5 CCD have anything to do with TSV's, then they are, like the yellow structures below, for receiving the TSV's (red) that go through the Cache die.

The Zen 5 CCD is on top here and facing down: (Ignore the bottom right detail which shows the previous version)

View attachment 110808

The yellow structures are what AMD calls bond pad vias. They are basically a modified pad structure to interface with a TSV since AMD does back to face stacking. I figured that Fritzchens' process allowed him to have at least some understanding of the vertical depth the structures he is showing are at as he does a multi-layer composite. If that is not true, then I guess those structures could be the vias that attach to the pads rather than TSVs. It still doesn't seem to match up to me, though, as it then should match the pad/ball structure of the vanilla CCD which I don't think it does? The pitch seems to small as well. Someone posted the bonding structure in this thread, I'll try and find it again.

Edit: You are the one that posted the BGA picture. They don't match up at all and as expected, the "TSV" pitch is way too tight. Unless someone has any more info, we'll have to wait for AMD to tell us what's going on. Maybe the TSVs are there as an artifact of a prior plan to keep the CCD on bottom or as an experiment to do more stacking? Either that or the structures in the pictures aren't TSVs at all, but then I'm not sure what they would be.
 
Last edited:

OneEng2

Senior member
Sep 19, 2022
259
356
106
Its actually a nonsensical statement.

"That's wrong. If you run two identical processors on different processes on the 5nm node. Clock for clock the performance on N4P will be 11% better on average than on N5. That means if you run a 7800x3d @ 1.2v and 4ghz. The N4P at the same clock and voltage would perform 11% better than on N5 with identical clocks and voltage. The efficiency gains means at the same voltage it would take eg. 10% less power to produce the same result. The increased clocks are primarily due to silicon and or voltage.

Fun fact. AMD actually wanted the Zen 4 CPU's on N5P but they had to settle for N5."



AFAIK, identical circuits at the same clock will have the same performance (IPC) on different nodes but power will be different.
Agreed; however, it may not have as much of a difference as the fab metrics state as this depends on how many and which kind of transistors are used in different places in the design.
 

moinmoin

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2017
5,145
8,226
136
The Zen 5 CCD die isn't thinned anymore like Zen 3/4 to accommodate the X3D V-cache.

Thus: There are no TSV's going through the entire Zen 5 CCD, and they would only end up at the thermal paste / heath-sink anyway.
It's not about thinning or not, that's completely beside the point. You see those structures so they exists. What do they exist for?

It's logical that if there's no die being put on top the die in question is not being thinned. No CCD die without a X3D die on top was ever thinned, because why should it? Fritzchens Fritz photo of the die is also of one that (originally) wasn't thinned.

If these structures seen on the Zen 5 CCD have anything to do with TSV's, then they are, like the yellow structures below, for receiving the TSV's (red) that go through the Cache die.

The Zen 5 CCD is on top here and facing down: (Ignore the bottom right detail which shows the previous version)
We see the structure on top though, since it is a photo from the top of the die. Like I asked before, was that because AMD was preparing for X3D dies on top as well? Or could they be for something else on top?

As @Hitman928 also pointed out there are plenty structures we ended up not having any clue what they actually are for. That's very unsatisfying to say the least.
 
Reactions: Tlh97 and Joe NYC

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,390
11,392
136
It's not about thinning or not, that's completely beside the point. You see those structures so they exists. What do they exist for?

It's logical that if there's no die being put on top the die in question is not being thinned. No CCD die without a X3D die on top was ever thinned, because why should it? Fritzchens Fritz photo of the die is also of one that (originally) wasn't thinned.


We see the structure on top though, since it is a photo from the top of the die. Like I asked before, was that because AMD was preparing for X3D dies on top as well? Or could they be for something else on top?

As @Hitman928 also pointed out there are plenty structures we ended up not having any clue what they actually are for. That's very unsatisfying to say the least.

I just want to point out that just because the pictures are taken from the top of the die, doesn't mean the structures you see are literally on the surface. He's not using just a normal optical camera, otherwise you would see nothing. You are viewing layers down into the chip, which is why you could see TSVs for Zen 3 and Zen 4 in his previous designs. Those TSVs don't come to the surface of the die but he is still able to image them from the lower layers of the die.

I'm not sure if this is what you were implying, but just wanted to make sure it was clear if anyone was confused.

For the thinning, @Hans de Vries mentioned it because with TSVs, you have to thin the die to expose them on the backside. Technically the die could still use the TSVs as AMD never said they die wasn't thinned, just that it was much thicker than before. You do need to perform significant thinning if you are going to use the TSVs, but theoretically at least, the die could be much thicker than before and still be thinned for TSVs. I don't think that's what has happened, but it's theoretically possible.
 
Last edited:

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
26,389
15,513
136
LNL is fine. ARL-S is indeed a waste of N3b wafers.

AMD does ship an N3e product too, it's Turin-D. And it's class-leading.
And do you have any idea why its so hard to find a Turin motherboard ? One dual board is the only one available, and that only with rev 3, so they are only on ebay
 

dr1337

Senior member
May 25, 2020
428
707
136
Those TSVs don't come to the surface of the die but he is still able to image them from the lower layers of the die.
If the TSVs didn't reach through the die, how do they connect the cache chiplets on zen 3 and zen 4? Doesn't it literally stand for "Through Silicon"? Obviously Zen5 doesn't need TSVs if it doesn't have cache chiplets stacked on top of it.

Also heres the photographer himself and one of the die shots, suggesting they're structures related to the cache, he could be wrong though that was kinda my point with my first post lol. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ And as such, extending that to people who thought they knew where the TSVs were/are on the old architectures; the people doing these die analyses are just chucking stuff at the wall.

 

Thunder 57

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2007
3,079
4,873
136
Looks like Zen 5 prices are nosediving, at least at the 'egg. The 9700X and 9900X in particular should be hard to pass up for anyone looking to get off of Zen 2 or Zen 3 at this point that doesnt need X3D.

View attachment 110807

That 9900X price is insane. I would be all over that if I was looking to upgrade. I'd gladly take that and save $100 over the 9800X3D.
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,390
11,392
136
If the TSVs didn't reach through the die, how do they connect the cache chiplets on zen 3 and zen 4? Doesn't it literally stand for "Through Silicon"?

Also heres the photographer himself and one of the die shots, suggesting they're structures related to the cache, he could be wrong though that was kinda my point with my first post lol. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


A die can kind of be split into 3 general vertical sections. From top to bottom, you have the metal layers, the contacts (basically vias to the transistor area) and transistors, and the silicon underneath it all that traditionally had nothing in it. A TSV adds a via, or metal pathway in a vertical direction, through that underneath silicon to connect out the bottom of the chip, hence the name, through silicon via (TSV). Most TSVs in modern packaging go through the "empty" silicon and connect up to a very deep metal located near the transistors and not all the way to the top of the chip. So you are connecting from a close to transistor metal, to something on the backside of the chip and there are many metal layers above where the TSV stops.

For Zen 3 and Zen 4, the CCD is flipped upside down (flip-chip, which is typical for CPUs) so now the top of the chip is facing down and connects to the package from the top of the chip. The TSVs, which come out of the bottom of the chip, are now at the top and connect to the cache chiplet which is also flipped upside down, so you are stacking them "back to face," meaning the bottom of the CCD is interfacing with the top of the cache chiplet. Before it was known that the CCD is now on top, Fritzchens took those images and found what look very much like TSV structures in relatively the same locations and structure as Zen 3/4 (not exactly the same, but generally) and so most assumed that generally the cache/CCD stack was the same as previous generations.

Now that we know that the CCD is on top, this doesn't really make much sense. So, there are a couple of possible explanations that I see but they both bring up additional questions.

  1. The CCD isn't flipped upside down and connects through TSVs to the cache chiplet on bottom.
    • This means that all the the signal and power/gnd connections have to come through the TSVs on the CCD but there doesn't appear to be enough of them in the right locations on the CCD for this to work. Additionally, the CCDs need to be able to get all of this from the top of the chip when there is no cache chiplet involved and the CCD is flipped upside down to connect to the package.
    • When the CCD isn't flip chip, it causes it's own thermal issues that need to be worked around.
  2. The CCD is flipped upside down and gets all of the power and ground connections through the top of the chip, the same as when there is no cache chiplet.
    • This means that all of the CCD power and ground signals have to be routed through the cache chiplet's TSVs.
    • If this is true, what are those structures on the CCD that look very much like TSVs? If they are TSVs, what are they doing there? If they are not, what are they?
      • One benefit is that they would provide some increased thermal conduction, but without them being near the hot spots of the chip, that doesn't seem like it would actually provide much benefit.
    • How is the additional routing for the V-cache handled now that it has to be routed from the top of the chip down to the rest of the cache?
My best guess is that both chiplets are still flip chip and what appear to be TSVs on the CCD are actually TSVs that are an artifact of a previous plan to either keep the CCD on bottom, or put a third chiplet on top. This seems like a waste of die area to keep them in there if they weren't going to be used in production, but it's possible that it was determined that removing them wasn't worth the time and money to do so, versus the small amount of extra die area they take.

I hope this clears up any confusion as to what I've been posting.

Edit: Here's an example image from Semi-analysis of what the TSVs would look like (generalized) for Ryzen products. The green/pink area are the metal layers, the grey/white/blue/brown is the contacts/transistor area, and the off-white or very light tan area is the "blank" silicon.

 
Last edited:

Joe NYC

Platinum Member
Jun 26, 2021
2,672
3,839
106
Since this is a speculation thread, does anybody care to speculate what the other 1/2 might be, what Kopite is hinting at?

My speculation would be complete removal of L3 SRAM from main CCD die. And moving the CCD of Zen 6 to the most advanced note (N3P or N2) to harness all of the density improvements. CCD would be overwhelmingly logic, and the density improvements are primarily in logic.

 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |