Pennsylvania? They removed vote by party I think back in 2020 as part as some BS compromise to the State GOP for vote by mail i think.
Pennsylvania? They removed vote by party I think back in 2020 as part as some BS compromise to the State GOP for vote by mail i think.Voted today. Noticed the absence of an option for voting by party. They asked for my name and 2 different people said they had me on their list. Still wouldn't let me vote twice.
Various early indicators seem to be saying turnout will exceed 2020, perhaps substantially in some places.
Any links so we can study the data?Various early indicators seem to be saying turnout will exceed 2020, perhaps substantially in some places.
I'm guessing close to 90 million for Harris and somewhere around 80 million for Trump. 2% MOE for Harris and 5% MOE for Trump. 400+ EC votes for Harris.Various early indicators seem to be saying turnout will exceed 2020, perhaps substantially in some places.
their?Is English like a second language their?
Turnout for whom, though.
Any links so we can study the data?
I didn't phonebank this weekend so I'm cold-calling Georgia voters as we speak. The kamala website did not let me choose a state today, it just started me on Georgia for now.
I gotta start reading some turnout and exit polling data soon. I'll try to post links if I find anything good.
IIRC, the Que is in CA. As long as his ballot is postmarked before 8pm today, it will be counted.You'd better check whether you even can do that at this point. In Arizona they have to have been received by today, so unless you already have the correct ballot to submit and are gonna put it in a drop box for it to be counted, you might need to just go to the booth, if you want your vote to be counted.
It's going to be a hell of a win if Harris pulls it off, given the worldwide incumbent backlash across recent elections around the world.
Yep. Republicans could have had a layup of an election, but they decided to scatter about a ton of rakes for themselves to step on.If it works out this way it's probably because Trump squandered almost every advantage and R crafted near total abortion bans that are getting women killed are, in fact, really unpopular.
If Trump gets crushed our saving grace will always be how enormously inept he and his campaign are and always have been. I mean, conservatives/Republicans have been increasingly inept in general, but nobody, and I mean nobody, does inept better than Trump. Big league amateurs.If it works out this way it's probably because Trump squandered almost every advantage and R crafted near total abortion bans that are getting women killed are, in fact, really unpopular.
Probably better than most Americans.their?
But, I think the general consensus is that most Danes, are very well versed in articulating in the English language
If Trump gets crushed our saving grace will always be how enormously inept he and his campaign are and always have been. I mean, conservatives/Republicans have been increasingly inept in general, but nobody, and I mean nobody, does inept better than Trump. Big league amateurs.
The LAT wrote a few days ago that most generic (R) candidates could have cruised to a win in this tough electoral environment for incumbents. Although the "fundamentals" (as Lichtman might say) should favor the Dems.It's going to be a hell of a win if Harris pulls it off, given the worldwide incumbent backlash across recent elections around the world.
Mexico would pay for them, duh, just like the big, beautiful wall!The LAT wrote a few days ago that most generic (R) candidates could have cruised to a win in this tough electoral environment for incumbents. Although the "fundamentals" (as Lichtman might say) should favor the Dems.
I wrote should because the NYT had a feature yesterday with its last look at "independent" voters who'd just made up their minds. It was a like a round table and these 14 or so people were quoted. And you had a dumb mofo that said she wants prices to drop back to where they were in 2019, and that's why she's choosing Trump. I'm trying to stay optimistic but a large chunk of the electorate is dumb as rocks, and they aren't all MAGAts. I really don't know who's gonna win, but people have made it quite clear that their enduring "vibes" this year are about (past) inflation* and the migration crisis.
Just as in 2016, Trump just needs on the order of hundreds of thousands of convincible rubes in just the right few states to steal the EC.
* Past inflation = current prices. People don't care (or know) what the latest BLS CPI is. And they certainly don't know how 100% tariffs on Mexican goods would work in the real world.
State sponsored equal opportunity public educationIs English like a second language their?
their?
But, I think the general consensus is that most Danes, are very well versed in articulating in the English language
It has been an enduring source of frustration for me that so few of the pieces that (I think correctly) discuss how voters are mad about inflation do not mention that it's the near-universal evaluation of economists that Trump's policies would make inflation much, much worse. That seems like highly relevant information!The LAT wrote a few days ago that most generic (R) candidates could have cruised to a win in this tough electoral environment for incumbents. Although the "fundamentals" (as Lichtman might say) should favor the Dems.
I wrote should because the NYT had a feature yesterday with its last look at "independent" voters who'd just made up their minds. It was a like a round table and these 14 or so people were quoted. And you had a dumb mofo that said she wants prices to drop back to where they were in 2019, and that's why she's choosing Trump. I'm trying to stay optimistic but a large chunk of the electorate is dumb as rocks, and they aren't all MAGAts. I really don't know who's gonna win, but people have made it quite clear that their enduring "vibes" this year are about (past) inflation* and the migration crisis.
Just as in 2016, Trump just needs on the order of hundreds of thousands of convincible rubes in just the right few states to steal the EC.
* Past inflation = current prices. People don't care (or know) what the latest BLS CPI is. And they certainly don't know how 100% tariffs on Mexican goods would work in the real world.
It has been an enduring source of frustration for me that so few of the pieces that (I think correctly) discuss how voters are mad about inflation do not mention that it's the near-universal evaluation of economists that Trump's policies would make inflation much, much worse. That seems like highly relevant information!
Just read that Philly is about to hit the 2020 turnout total by 1pm. That would be amazing.