Biggest Democratic mistake in the last 4 years: letting Biden steamroll a primary.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,086
8,662
136
Republicans actually have to govern, which they will discover is harder than sabotaging a government and blaming everything that happens on the governing party. From 1-20-25 on, if things go to shit - Republican’s fault. Republicans will soon find out that it’s easier to wield a wrecking ball than a construction crane. there won’t be (I hope) a pandemic to obfuscate the relative success or failure of their governance.

One normal positive case for losing the presidency is that the other party is likely to do well in the next congressional elections. If Trump turns out to be a real dictator, this does not apply. But destroying a representative democracy as entrenched as the U.S. likely takes more than four or eight years. Of course, likely is not the same as impossible.

I see these things as possible positives:

America can get Trump out of its system in 4 years. You want a chaotic evil President except this time he has a literal kill list? Well now you have him, and you get to see what he does with that power.

Even though Trump won’t accept responsibility for anything, things will still be his and the R's fault. Natural disasters, economy, foreign policy crises, et cetera. Trump can and will blame them on everyone else but at the end of the day POTUS is expected to do things and he will fail to do them. If he is candidate Trump, he can ascribe this to sabotage. If he is President Trump, his failures belong to him whether he wants them or not.

Possible negatives:

it’s a fact that one of the oldest, most mature democracies in the world entrusted its highest office to a lying, cheating, incompetent charlatan. That’s the bad thing. It’s the fact that it did so again that’s the bad thing. It’s the fact that the public failed to act in its own best interest, calling into question the assumptions behind the idea of democracy.

Vance’s closeness to both Curtis Yarwin’s neo-monarchistic ideas and the integralism movement that openly calls for a revocation of the separation of church and state, not to mention men getting the vote for their household (in proportion of the number of children they have), makes him a much more direct threat to core democratic values than a narcissist whose vision barely exceeds his own caricature.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: gothuevos

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
7,749
6,425
136
America can get Trump out of its system in 4 years. You want a chaotic evil President except this time he has a literal kill list? Well now you have him, and you get to see what he does with that power.
No they can't. He is above the law not in any figurative sense but in a literal sense after the SC ruling. This is over, Trump is the nation's king. It's the wildest copium ever to believe even our former Potemkin democracy can survive a king accountable to no one. He can murder his opponents now. This is not random leftist dumbass on the internet's opinion: this is Sotomayor's official opinion in her dissent to the Trump Vs United States ruling. He can throw out votes he doesn't like now. He could run in 2028 on having never had a bowel movement and getting 11 holes in one the first time he played a round of golf and he'll win with 94% of the vote.
 
Reactions: gothuevos

gothuevos

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2010
2,704
2,117
136
No they can't. He is above the law not in any figurative sense but in a literal sense after the SC ruling. This is over, Trump is the nation's king. It's the wildest copium ever to believe even our former Potemkin democracy can survive a king accountable to no one. He can murder his opponents now. This is not random leftist dumbass on the internet's opinion: this is Sotomayor's official opinion in her dissent to the Trump Vs United States ruling. He can throw out votes he doesn't like now. He could run in 2028 on having never had a bowel movement and getting 11 holes in one the first time he played a round of golf and he'll win with 94% of the vote.

I mean it's already starting - Lara Trump yesterday said they "need some sort of federal election law." I'm sure this will include some sort of stuff the GOP always wanted (voter ID, etc), but it will probably also given them some sort of ability to toss votes, change electors, etc.

It's coming. They will need to nuke the filibuster to pass it, but who cares at that point since they will have enshrined themselves forever with no possibility of electoral defeat.

And I don't think Trump will run again - it will simply be JD Vance or another Thiel/Elon acolyte miraculously getting 89% of the vote!
 

gothuevos

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2010
2,704
2,117
136
Republicans actually have to govern, which they will discover is harder than sabotaging a government and blaming everything that happens on the governing party. From 1-20-25 on, if things go to shit - Republican’s fault. Republicans will soon find out that it’s easier to wield a wrecking ball than a construction crane. there won’t be (I hope) a pandemic to obfuscate the relative success or failure of their governance.

One normal positive case for losing the presidency is that the other party is likely to do well in the next congressional elections. If Trump turns out to be a real dictator, this does not apply. But destroying a representative democracy as entrenched as the U.S. likely takes more than four or eight years. Of course, likely is not the same as impossible.

I see these things as possible positives:

America can get Trump out of its system in 4 years. You want a chaotic evil President except this time he has a literal kill list? Well now you have him, and you get to see what he does with that power.

Even though Trump won’t accept responsibility for anything, things will still be his and the R's fault. Natural disasters, economy, foreign policy crises, et cetera. Trump can and will blame them on everyone else but at the end of the day POTUS is expected to do things and he will fail to do them. If he is candidate Trump, he can ascribe this to sabotage. If he is President Trump, his failures belong to him whether he wants them or not.

Possible negatives:

it’s a fact that one of the oldest, most mature democracies in the world entrusted its highest office to a lying, cheating, incompetent charlatan. That’s the bad thing. It’s the fact that it did so again that’s the bad thing. It’s the fact that the public failed to act in its own best interest, calling into question the assumptions behind the idea of democracy.

Vance’s closeness to both Curtis Yarwin’s neo-monarchistic ideas and the integralism movement that openly calls for a revocation of the separation of church and state, not to mention men getting the vote for their household (in proportion of the number of children they have), makes him a much more direct threat to core democratic values than a narcissist whose vision barely exceeds his own caricature.

Glad someone else recognizes the role Yarvin and Thiel are playing in all this.
 
Reactions: dainthomas

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
7,749
6,425
136
I mean it's already starting - Lara Trump yesterday said they "need some sort of federal election law." I'm sure this will include some sort of stuff the GOP always wanted (voter ID, etc), but it will probably also given them some sort of ability to toss votes, change electors, etc.

It's coming. They will need to nuke the filibuster to pass it, but who cares at that point since they will have enshrined themselves forever with no possibility of electoral defeat.

And I don't think Trump will run again - it will simply be JD Vance or another Thiel/Elon acolyte miraculously getting 89% of the vote!
I do think he'll run again because he loves the rallies, the photo ops, getting his ass kissed by every member of the party publicly, etc. Vance will the actual president though when it comes to policy and whipping votes. It'll be the exact same role Trump offered Kasich to be his VP in 2016.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
24,507
11,145
136
Incumbent government parties across the planet have gotten squashed. Applied both to the right and left wherever they were in power. I am skeptical a primary would have made much difference especially v Trump where so much of his appeal is rooted in his ability to get voters to deny objective reality.
It's a worldwide phenomenon. So money is the most important thing to people in this world. Nothing else matters, even your freedom.
 
Reactions: nakedfrog

gothuevos

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2010
2,704
2,117
136
It's a worldwide phenomenon. So money is the most important thing to people in this world. Nothing else matters, even your freedom.

Stop trying to rationalize it or even shame voters for it.

Just lean into it.
 

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
7,749
6,425
136
It's a worldwide phenomenon. So money is the most important thing to people in this world. Nothing else matters, even your freedom.
If people actually voted with their pocketbooks this nation would be in far better shape than it is. Because if there is one guarantee when you elect a GOP president, it's an economic crash.
 
Reactions: Fenixgoon

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
24,507
11,145
136
If people actually voted with their pocketbooks this nation would be in far better shape than it is. Because if there is one guarantee when you elect a GOP president, it's an economic crash.
We will be back (Dems), maybe, to fix the problem as usual, and then when things are just about to take off, the memory of goldfish people will just listen to whatever misinformation is in front of them that makes them feel good, and vote for whatever that is. The 5th estate has been destroyed.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
23,539
21,770
136
Harris went from 17 points unfavorable to crossing over into positive territory and by eday only at 2 points unfavorable. Just an unbelievable shift in opinion that nobody has ever seen.

A shitload of people just voted for somebody they didn't like but they believed the lies he told them.
And I think that is a testament to what an overall great job she did with so little time relatively speaking. and I thought she presented herself very well, she was genuine, she was smart, she destroyed Trump in the debate, we saw why she is a successful career woman. She earned it.
I do think she should have separated herself from Biden more but overall, ran a great campaign.

I disagree though that is evidence enough to dismiss the advantages a primary would have given us - it would have shown we wanted to move on from Biden, it probably would have gotten us a straight white male, which we know a lot of the shit in this country can stomach better, and if we did nominate a woman - she would have had a lot longer of a time to make that part palatable to the idiots.

If I can point to the single biggest fuckup of the Dems of the last four years, and possibly in over a decade, it's letting Biden steamroll a primary.
 

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
7,749
6,425
136
And I think that is a testament to what an overall great job she did with so little time relatively speaking. and I thought she presented herself very well, she was genuine, she was smart, she destroyed Trump in the debate, we saw why she is a successful career woman. She earned it.
I do think she should have separated herself from Biden more but overall, ran a great campaign.

I disagree though that is evidence enough to dismiss the advantages a primary would have given us - it would have shown we wanted to move on from Biden, it probably would have gotten us a straight white male, which we know a lot of the shit in this country can stomach better, and if we did nominate a woman - she would have had a lot longer of a time to make that part palatable to the idiots.

If I can point to the single biggest fuckup of the Dems of the last four years, and possibly in over a decade, it's letting Biden steamroll a primary.
I thought her campaign was truly horrible, one of the worst I have ever seen. She could have been shouting from the rooftops about the $2000 out pocket cap in Medicare for prescription drugs. She could have been shouting from the rooftops that Trump will completely kill off Social Security. Instead the last week of the campaign all I saw on TV was her ad with the Republican guy who voted for Trump two times but won't the third time and the ad about how Trump was unfit. Same stupid campaign Clinton lost on trying to get right wing Kool Aid drinkers to cross over. Oh and campaigning with Liz Cheney, one the nastiest pieces of shit on this earth. With it looking like Trump will win the popular vote by 3 points with about the same vote total he got last election when he lost it by 4.5 points that screams Harris utterly failed to turn out the base by trying so hard to appeal to the right.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
23,539
21,770
136
I thought her campaign was truly horrible, one of the worst I have ever seen. She could have been shouting from the rooftops about the $2000 out pocket cap in Medicare for prescription drugs. She could have been shouting from the rooftops that Trump will completely kill off Social Security. Instead the last week of the campaign all I saw on TV was her ad with the Republican guy who voted for Trump two times but won't the third time and the ad about how Trump was unfit. Same stupid campaign Clinton lost on trying to get right wing Kool Aid drinkers to cross over. Oh and campaigning with Liz Cheney, one the nastiest pieces of shit on this earth. With it looking like Trump will win the popular vote by 3 points with about the same vote total he got last election when he lost it by 4.5 points that screams Harris utterly failed to turn out the base by trying so hard to appeal to the right.
I saw ads here about how Trump's economic plan would make SS insolvent in six years.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
64,661
13,012
146
So many of youse folks ridiculed me when I said Kamala wasn't a strong candidate and couldn't beat Trump. I voted for her...but had little hope she'd actually win.
 

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
7,749
6,425
136
So many of youse folks ridiculed me when I said Kamala wasn't a strong candidate and couldn't beat Trump. I voted for her...but had little hope she'd actually win.
Same here. Only person I voted for who won was Cuellar for TX-28 who I hate and was literally the last person I would have wanted to win if you told me only one of my votes would be for a winning candidate.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,817
4,778
136
Biggest mistake was allowing Joe Biden to continue in his mental decline for so long before admitting the truth to themselves.

Second biggest mistake was putting up an empty (pant) suited airhead that did not have any policies to run on except "I'm not Trump or Biden" and repeating empty statements ad nauseam with no substance.
 
Reactions: Zorba

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
23,539
21,770
136
Biggest mistake was allowing Joe Biden to continue in his mental decline for so long before admitting the truth to themselves.

Second biggest mistake was putting up an empty (pant) suited airhead that did not have any policies to run on except "I'm not Trump or Biden" and repeating empty statements ad nauseam with no substance.
This is part of why you are an iredeemable deplorable shitstain on humanity.
 
Reactions: Brainonska511

RalphTheCow

Senior member
Sep 14, 2000
676
159
116
I think a more fundamental problem is we have lost Joe Sixpack, to quote former luminaries! We are looked on as out of touch Coastal elites. You know, what Republicans used to be.
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
12,185
3,108
136
Joe Biden was sunk. In July, he had very low equity to win the election. Definitely below 33% but hard to say exactly how low.

But if he had never run again, and we had a normal primary, Harris isn't the nominee. I don't think we had an ideal candidate (how often do you have a 2008 Obama anyway?), but I can think of several that would have performed better* this past Tuesday: Sanders (I know, too old), Whitmer and Buttigieg. Bernie ALWAYS performed well in head-to-head polls vs DJT.

In July, Harris was our "break glass in case of emergency" option, but what OP is saying is that it should have never come to this. Having said that, the DNC didn't let Joe run again. Joe did Joe, and thus the die was cast.

* I said this in January and I hate to be spot on.

http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=threads/trump-wins-iowa-is-anyone-surprised.2617034/post-41141115


I think a more fundamental problem is we have lost Joe Sixpack, to quote former luminaries! We are looked on as out of touch Coastal elites. You know, what Republicans used to be.
Absolutely, but the electorate is effectively brainwashed by social media now. If this was an easy problem to fix, we would have done so already.
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
12,762
8,959
136
Biggest mistake was allowing Joe Biden to continue in his mental decline for so long before admitting the truth to themselves.

Second biggest mistake was putting up an empty (pant) suited airhead that did not have any policies to run on except "I'm not Trump or Biden" and repeating empty statements ad nauseam with no substance.

Since we're United States of Sixth Grade Reading Ability now.. what's ad nauseum mean?
 
Reactions: gothuevos

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
23,539
21,770
136
When you have nothing else resort to name calling.

Typical for you.
Your despicableness has been prove here over and over and over again. I don't need to dissect the total lies in your post nor the amazing amount of sheer misogyny. It's been proven by myself in the past, and many others much more recently, since any facts go in one ear and out the other with you.

You are gross.
 
Reactions: pcgeek11

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,817
4,778
136
Since we're United States of Sixth Grade Reading Ability now.. what's ad nauseam mean?

Look it up.... You misspelled it, I corrected it in my quote of your post.

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more

ad nauseam
/ˌad ˈnɔːzɪəm/
adverb
adverb: ad nauseam
  1. used to refer to the fact that something has been done or repeated so often that it has become annoying or tiresome.
    "the phrase he repeated ad nauseam"
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |