Haha we have now reached the part where the unanimous jury is also in on the conspiracy.
Was the second jury that found him guilty of 34 felonies also in on it?
Haha we have now reached the part where the unanimous jury is also in on the conspiracy.My opinion is that the entire case was bullshit. It appears that that's the majority opinion of the nation.
You based your opinion on…?
Look, as he’s said many times all he’s defending is the idea that someone is innocent until a jury finds them guilty.Movable goalpost technology.
You mean the same majority that said banning black people from a public accommodation isn't racist?My opinion is that the entire case was bullshit. It appears that that's the majority opinion of the nation.
It’s funny you’ve previously made the argument that we can’t know things without a trial. There was a trial a verdict was rendered and you just hand wave the result away.My opinion is that the entire case was bullshit. It appears that that's the majority opinion of the nation.
It's been clear that people pretending to have integrity are the worst kind of people to attempt a conversation with.It’s funny you’ve previously made the argument that we can’t know things without a trial. There was a trial a verdict was rendered and you just hand wave the result away.
It’s almost like you aren’t arguing in good faith or something.
Why post such foolishness? I expressed an opinion that you disagree with, and you can't live with that so you have to launch off into stupidity and innuendo. Help me understand why.Trump rapes a 9 year old girl
Grennie: She entrapped him
I mean I've been asking you for a while to help me understand what policies Trump and/or Harris have that would lead you to decide someone convicted of dozens of felonies, found liable for rape, and who attempted a coup was the preferable candidate.Why post such foolishness? I expressed an opinion that you disagree with, and you can't live with that so you have to launch off into stupidity and innuendo. Help me understand why.
As a Trump supporter why would stupidity and innuendo bother you? It’s kind of Trump’s stock and trade.Why post such foolishness? I expressed an opinion that you disagree with, and you can't live with that so you have to launch off into stupidity and innuendo. Help me understand why.
You claimed Trump being a sexual assaulter is bullshit despite his admission and adjudicated as such. You not only disagreed but just for the sake of Trump indicted our entire criminal justice system.Why post such foolishness? I expressed an opinion that you disagree with, and you can't live with that so you have to launch off into stupidity and innuendo. Help me understand why.
I mean for months/years he was like 'you can't judge Trump guilty as he hasn't been convicted yet'.You claimed Trump being a sexual assaulter is bullshit despite his admission and adjudicated as such. You not only disagreed but just for the sake of Trump indicted our entire criminal justice system.
My response was to point out no matter how heinous an act Trump commits you will find a way to excuse it.
He said himself he can murder someone on 5th ave and his people wouldn't care. Check.
Twice publicly admitted to being a sexual assaulter. Check.
At his sexual assault trial the judge said Trump raped her. Check.
Bursting into a dressing room to ogle underage girls. Check.
Jeffery Epstein BFF. Check
My final point Trump raping a 9 year old girl is not a stretch given his history. Given your history, excusing it a not a stretch either.
You call my post foolish. What would have been foolish? The scenario of Obama raping a 9 year old. Why? Because based on what we publicly know the plausibility of Obama doing it a close to zero. Trump however has a history that makes it highly plausible he is capable of such a heinous act.
My opinion is that the entire case was bullshit. It appears that that's the majority opinion of the nation.
If the appeals court overturns the conviction then he wasn't guilty of anything. The "crime" in question had no victim.
Amusingly enough his argument also means it should be legal for everyone to lie on their credit/mortgage applications so long as they pay on time. Sure you've lied to the bank and exposed them to a bunch of risk they didn't want to take on and/or worse lending terms for them but since you abided by the terms of the agreement you fraudulently entered into it's fine! It's basically an argument that fraud shouldn't be considered fraud so long as you can make the lie work.That is incorrect
Banks have a finite amount of money to lend. The banks will loan out money to people and could have denied other people with more favorable terms
A fair analogy would be speeding if I don’t cause an accident or impede others there is no victim but I would still have consequences if caught
This is no differnt
Hm, and something tells me he'll continue to not ever give a meaningful answer. Cognitive dissonance probably getting in the way.I mean I've been asking you for a while to help me understand what policies Trump and/or Harris have that would lead you to decide someone convicted of dozens of felonies, found liable for rape, and who attempted a coup was the preferable candidate.
Why would you expect him to do what you refuse to do yourself? Don't all the felonies bother you?
'The heart loves, the will chooses, and the mind justifies.'Hm, and something tells me he'll continue to not ever give a meaningful answer. Cognitive dissonance probably getting in the way.
Can't like this hard enough.'The heart loves, the will chooses, and the mind justifies.'
He wanted to vote for Trump so he found a way to convince himself all the felonies, rapes, etc. either didn't happen or are part of some witch hunt that Trump is a victim of. He doesn't want to come right out and say that though because he knows on one level how crazy that sounds. So... best to not answer.
Trump clearly committed felony fraud. I can't quite work up a tear for the banks he defrauded. Banks won't do due diligence if they think they can make more money by skipping it. A good chunk of the junk mortgages at the center of the 2008 meltdown were based on "liar loans" where everyone involved knew the borrowers didn't have the means to repay the loans. But since housing never goes down and the banks were flipping the loans anyway, the banks didn't care. Trump is an even worse case as he had a decades long history of screwing creditors. Loaning money to Trump is plain old stupid.Amusingly enough his argument also means it should be legal for everyone to lie on their credit/mortgage applications so long as they pay on time. Sure you've lied to the bank and exposed them to a bunch of risk they didn't want to take on and/or worse lending terms for them but since you abided by the terms of the agreement you fraudulently entered into it's fine! It's basically an argument that fraud shouldn't be considered fraud so long as you can make the lie work.
All those out of work white people clamoring for those jobs, duh.Who is the victim of someone overstaying their Visa and continuing to work and live in this country? Who is the victim of someone illegally crossing the border so they can work, live, and pay taxes in this country?
Those same unemployed white folk gonna be doing all the picking and manual labor once those pesky illegals are “solutioned” too.All those out of work white people clamoring for those jobs, duh.