Russia on brink of ... NOPE! Russia INVADES Ukraine!

Page 1630 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
29,182
41,259
136
There's a third option. Ukraine develops nukes. Because Europe doesn't have the unity or political will to send hundred of thousand of troops and equipment who need massive financial supply to be deployed and maintained to that border, and NATO is not viable for Ukraine right now.

It won't be "nukes" like others have, it will be nuclear IEDs made with fuel rods. Think a poor man's tactical nuke. They just don't have the time or money to put together enrichment plus a dedicated weapons program.

Something around a kiloton, definitely something Putin needs to worry about. Ukraine has good missile tech. Or maybe the GUR sneaks next to the Kremlin, maybe a few for Putin's mansions and train system.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
49,019
39,134
136
It won't be "nukes" like others have, it will be nuclear IEDs made with fuel rods. Think a poor man's tactical nuke. They just don't have the time or money to put together enrichment plus a dedicated weapons program.

Something around a kiloton, definitely something Putin needs to worry about. Ukraine has good missile tech. Or maybe the GUR sneaks next to the Kremlin, maybe a few for Putin's mansions and train system.

Those would just be dirty bombs which are also an option.

I've seen some technical discussions about how long it could take Ukraine to put together an improvised Purex process if they threw caution and safety to the wind. Most people seem to think that in a true emergency they could probably whittle the time to an acceptable bomb grade Pu down to about a year.
 

Braznor

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2005
4,652
417
126
Is this what you guys day dream about?

Man, how the standards have fallen?!?! 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
49,019
39,134
136
WRT the massive Russian attack on Ukrainian energy infra overnight every time that happens the Ukrainians should launch every long range drone they have against a single major Russian energy site including the oil/LNG export terminals. For openers they should burn Tuapse to the ground.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
29,182
41,259
136
You know I did make one mistake.

I thought this place would be like the pulse of a nation, no matter how small and inconsequential it was. I really did think that; it was so foolish of me.

I was so wrong about that, the US election proved it as such.

You guys are nothing more than a bunch of trolls hiding and muttering insane crap in an underwater cave. Now that I realize it, I find myself laughing at you guys.

As for you guys giving me sermons about how the world works, I can only say: HA HA HA HA 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

I'm sorry, but I can never take you guys seriously ever again.


Going by the zeal with which you embarrass yourself here coward, I don't think you take much seriously at all. We don't take you seriously either, if it makes you feel any better.

A incel fanboi of fascism and rape can never take us seriously ever again. Well shit. How disconcerting. Whatever will we do now?
 
Reactions: zinfamous

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
36,568
31,325
136
Any nuclear armed nation that finds itself on the brink of defeat/destruction will very likely use its nukes against the aggressor and its aggressor's allies because there is nothing left to lose from their perspective. This is why nuclear armed nations really don't want to go to war with each other.
I suspect given the choice of death (going nuclear) or surrender at least 75% of general population will choose surrender.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
49,019
39,134
136
I suspect given the choice of death (going nuclear) or surrender at least 75% of general population will choose surrender.

Do you think the Israelis would have surrendered to the Arabs in 1973 instead of using the bombs if it came to it?
 

Braznor

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2005
4,652
417
126
Going by the zeal with which you embarrass yourself here coward, I don't think you take much seriously at all. We don't take you seriously either, if it makes you feel any better.

A incel fanboi of fascism and rape can never take us seriously ever again. Well shit. How disconcerting. Whatever will we do now?
Yea, so says the pedophilia, child mutilating, war mongering supporting members of P&N.

What will you ever do now?

The answer is nothing, you did the worst thing possible to yourselves already.

Lets take an inventory of all the great things you accomplished:

1. You have almost managed to finish Ukraine to the last man and woman in the battlefield. The best way to end this was through negotiations at a time when conditions were still favorable for Ukraine. But your pride and arrogance blocked you from ever contemplating this option. Now you are reduced to contemplate insane solutions like Ukraine using nukes or dirty bombs against Russia.

2. You lost an election in the worst possible manner by nominating the worst possible candidate at the worst possible time.

3. Half the world is laughing at you and the other half is crying for you.

4. You have successfully managed to turn almost the entire nation against yourself, including every minority you purported to 'save' from their own foolishness.

I could go on and on, but coming back to your question : What would you ever do?

The answer is still nothing,.Your false pride, your folly, your arrogance, and your blindness has done everything for you, everything in the worst possible manner for you. I say this partly with deep sadness too.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: RnR_au and kage69

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
34,255
8,300
136
I see the venom from India has gotten rather extreme of late.
You are endorsing Russia's invasion of Europe?

And yes, imagine that... we "fantasize" of killing invaders. Of Evil being stopped.
There once was a day when India knew what it was like to oppose a Colonial Empire occupying somebody else's land.
My, how money has changed you.

Make no mistake. The further Russia advances towards NATO, the more likely nuclear weapons will be used.
Think about that, before you promote Russia.
 
Reactions: Young Grasshopper

Braznor

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2005
4,652
417
126
I see the venom from India has gotten rather extreme of late.
You are endorsing Russia's invasion of Europe?

And yes, imagine that... we "fantasize" of killing invaders. Of Evil being stopped.
There once was a day when India knew what it was like to oppose a Colonial Empire occupying somebody else's land.
My, how money has changed you.

Make no mistake. The further Russia advances towards NATO, the more likely nuclear weapons will be used.
Think about that, before you promote Russia.
I still wish Ukraine the very best. I would like nothing more than the resumption of the status of Ukraine prior to the war with all its territories intact. Perhaps a bit wiser, but nevertheless whole.

There is no promotion of Russia in my post. I simply stated the current conditions in the battlefield. If you think thats advocating Russian interests, well there is nothing I can do about it.
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
12,766
8,960
136
I still wish Ukraine the very best. I would like nothing more than the resumption of the status of Ukraine prior to the war with all its territories intact. Perhaps a bit wiser, but nevertheless whole.

There is no promotion of Russia in my post. I simply stated the current conditions in the battlefield. If you think thats advocating Russian interests, well there is nothing I can do about it.

Go suck on Modi's dick some more stinky jackass!
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
36,568
31,325
136
Do you think the Israelis would have surrendered to the Arabs in 1973 instead of using the bombs if it came to it?
I wasn't alive then so can't really comment on that. Look, I'm certainly not saying nuclear launch is impossible, just improbable. The smaller the state with the fewer cooks in the kitchen the more probable it becomes. Small state like Israel? Yeah I could see bubby doing that. Large state like France? You'll never get enough public support for that when every country has their version of MAGAt just itching to join in what feels like real power.

If Trump said he was bringing over Putin right now to help run the country, in less than an hour you'd have all conservative media watchers telling us how great this is going to be.
 

Braznor

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2005
4,652
417
126
I thought you just supported rape, but I see from your projection you're even worse than we imagined.
In all my time here, I have been slandered in every manner possible. Nothing you conjure up from all your collective wretched imaginations will ever surprise me anymore. It's from the same wretched imagination; your friends here are conjuring up visions of Ukraine being rendered into an radioactive wasteland.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
49,019
39,134
136
You'll never get enough public support for that when every country has their version of MAGAt just itching to join in what feels like real power.

No country is going to take a referendum on if the canned sunshine flies. Whoever has command authority makes that decision all on their lonesome. Typically this is the president or pm depending on the state.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
29,182
41,259
136
Those would just be dirty bombs which are also an option.

I've seen some technical discussions about how long it could take Ukraine to put together an improvised Purex process if they threw caution and safety to the wind. Most people seem to think that in a true emergency they could probably whittle the time to an acceptable bomb grade Pu down to about a year.


Would you refer to Little Boy as "just a dirty bomb"?

If time is of the essence, and it probably is, they can't mess around with even hurried purification/extraction. They need "basic" weapons with a gun trigger mechanism and you can't use plutonium with those, far as I know (maybe I'm wrong).

Whatever they're going to do, probably needs to be ready for showtime in 2025, not later.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
36,568
31,325
136
No country is going to take a referendum on if the canned sunshine flies. Whoever has command authority makes that decision all on their lonesome. Typically this is the president or pm depending on the state.
Society exists right now because every country has many protocols in place to stop or delay the decision along the way. Yes I'm sure they also have rapid deployment protocols as well but again conditions for those need to be met. Someone like Macron isn't going to go nuclear without significant public buy-in.
 
Reactions: misuspita

you2

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2002
6,094
1,203
126
We'll just have to agree to disagree then. I don't think anyone wants to be the first to launch nukes no matter how bleak it may get. It doesn't have to be the US attacking Europe directly, everything could be channeled through Russia. We can't help what Russia does with our equipment. Besides, you shouldn't be sheltering Nazis in the first place, duh.
Well the problem there are some people so dumb like Trump he doesn't really understand what a nuke is so of course he would be willing to use them like lollipops. Hey lets give a lollipop to Iran
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
36,568
31,325
136
Well the problem there are some people so dumb like Trump he doesn't really understand what a nuke is so of course he would be willing to use them like lollipops. Hey lets give a lollipop to Iran
There is nothing in it for Trump or any US president to ever lob nukes at anyone unless nukes are already incoming. The lower 48 benefit from the most geographically advantageous position ever enjoyed by humanity. The whole of Asia, Europe and even Africa could glass each other and we would all still be going to work.
 

misuspita

Senior member
Jul 15, 2006
521
611
136
Trump is unpredictable, and he's made threatening overtures before, so I'm not keeping anything off the table at this point.
He is not yet a dictator, and not all the R party is behind him. Going against China, maybe, but going against Europe? Not a single chance
 

Braznor

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2005
4,652
417
126
It's cute how certain deluded people think Asia, Europe and Africa will nuke themselves into oblivion while leaving the US untouched. I guess it will be their wretched version of a fairy tale ending, huh?

Fantasies of the delusional mind.

If any of the great powers gets nuked, they wouldn't spare anyone on the other side.
 

misuspita

Senior member
Jul 15, 2006
521
611
136
Any Euro forces deployed would be relatively small but backed up by the continent's air power. Starting a war with the rest of Europe is not on Russia's to do list anytime soon since it's going to take them a decade to recover militarily from Ukraine.
It depends a lot of a lot of things and the timing. If EU doesn't get its military industry up to snuff to produce artilery and rockets in the quantities needed to stop a Ru invasion (in Ukr or N Eu) then you might get a cowardly Germany/Austria/Hungary/Slovakia/Swiss let Eastern Europe fall under Russian power if they stay safe. If everyone has nukes, nobody gives a sh@t of what anyone thinks, if the small countries are invaded, they will unleash nuclear hell onto Russia and will trigger MAD. Be sure Poland will nuclear destroy St Petersburg area and Moscow, which means really 90% or Russia. Rest is just peasants with no meaningful life without the European Russia.
 

you2

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2002
6,094
1,203
126
There is nothing in it for Trump or any US president to ever lob nukes at anyone unless nukes are already incoming. The lower 48 benefit from the most geographically advantageous position ever enjoyed by humanity. The whole of Asia, Europe and even Africa could glass each other and we would all still be going to work.
Yes but you assume he understand that - Trump is truly in the lower % of people when it comes to understanding things outside of abusing the legal system to rip people off. I honestly don't believe Trump fully understands what a nuke is and why it would be a mistake to use one.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |