You mean to say Zen5 CCD has more than 2 GMI links at the moment and at the same time that AMD won't use them on any product?Just as with MI300A, I am expecting AMD to use fully separate function blocks on the CCD for the interconnect on Halo.
History repeating itself: Zen3 already had TSVs for 3D$ that we only found out about later on.
Zen4 already had the SoIC blocks for MI300A that we only found out about later on.
And Zen5 pretty surely also already has these new blocks as well. The GMI links will be inactive on Halo - at least, that is my educated guess.
I am saying that, as was the case with Zen4 as well, Zen5 has two GMI links for EPYC and standard-Ryzen (only one used) SKUs and additionally has another way of interconnect for Halo. The latter one should be rather small and in some yet unidentified area.You mean to say Zen5 CCD has more than 2 GMI links at the moment and at the same time that AMD won't use them on any product?
Halo has a separate CCD with a separate TO accounted for.and additionally has another way of interconnect for Halo. The latter one should be rather small and in some yet unidentified area.
That'd be a surprise for me - and not in a good way. Somewhere I can hear the benefits of scale scream.Halo has a separate CCD with a separate TO accounted for.
What does TO stand for?Halo has a separate CCD with a separate TO accounted for
Any data for 2300 fclk, if it even works? I've heard of some CPUs doing 2233, but not 2300 (non-APU of course).Well im 1.22x faster xD
Pretty sure it's fan fiction. The Exynos RDNA agreement is as far as they'll go in smartphones.anyone know true/fake?
yeah. There is Sound Wave ARM based, so maybe phones will be real in futureBut they are an ARM licensee
AMD are laggard in using new processes. That doesn't work in the smartphone market. There's a near 0% chance AMD makes a SoC that actually shows up in phones and a 0% chance it uses Zen.yeah. There is Sound Wave ARM based, so maybe phones will be real in future
Some kind of ARM SoC is likely but smartphone SoC is very unlikely.anyone know true/fake?
AMD Rumored To Enter The "Smartphone Markets", Likely Introducing APU-Like "Ryzen AI' SoCs
AMD is rumored to enter the "smartphone markets" and is already in talks with integrators to have its "Ryzen AI" mobile SoCs in smartphones.wccftech.com
I tried 4600mts 2300fclk 2300uclk booted to windows but crashesh after 10sec.Any data for 2300 fclk, if it even works? I've heard of some CPUs doing 2233, but not 2300 (non-APU of course).
This is the original quotation from the yahoo article. It reads like AI generated nonsense.anyone know true/fake?
AMD Rumored To Enter The "Smartphone Markets", Likely Introducing APU-Like "Ryzen AI' SoCs
AMD is rumored to enter the "smartphone markets" and is already in talks with integrators to have its "Ryzen AI" mobile SoCs in smartphones.wccftech.com
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMD) operates as a semiconductor manufacturer. Latest reports from tech website Smartphone Magazine indicate that the company is planning to enter the smartphone market, and is in talks with phone makers to integrate the Ryzen processors, which are AI-capable, into smart handheld devices. AMD is well-known for powering PCs, but the recent foray of QUALCOMM, a phone-first semi firm, into the PC world, might be one of the reasons behind the AMD move, per the report.
Possible. Previously 8 cores in total (4 + 4 or 3 + 5)Kraken bin?
Yet another classic case of WCCFTech not giving a crap about what they scrape from the internet to regurgitate. The authors could read fan fiction from bilibili about their mother potentially buying out Intel and they'd report it without blinking an eye.anyone know true/fake?
AMD Rumored To Enter The "Smartphone Markets", Likely Introducing APU-Like "Ryzen AI' SoCs
AMD is rumored to enter the "smartphone markets" and is already in talks with integrators to have its "Ryzen AI" mobile SoCs in smartphones.wccftech.com
AMD Hydra rears its 12 heads!
Anyone know what geekbench is reporting as clusters here?
Comparison with 7640U: https://browser.geekbench.com/ai/v1/compare/108829?baseline=106385Anyone know what geekbench is reporting as clusters here?
If that's two small ccx:es with separate caches, I hate it. If that's two different types of cores sharing a L3, looks neat.
They're using N3e right now?AMD are laggard in using new processes
They're using it for one small part without all the assorted IP a proper SoC would need. AFAIK there isn't even an entirely N3 SoC on the roadmap through 2025. Far behind MediaTek and Qualcomm.They're using N3e right now?