- Nov 30, 2004
- 58,129
- 8,387
- 126
Inspired by a post in the RFWP thread. Cursive writing takes a fairly long time to learn properly, and doesn't have a lot of use in modern times. I'm nearly 100% certain I couldn't do a grade school type paper giving a proper demonstration of every letter, upper and lower case. I can fluently read cursive though.
Teaching Pros:
There's still a lot of places cursive writing could be run into, and it would be good(and sometimes necessary for people to be able to understand)
If one doesn't know cursive, it would be a kind of soft illiteracy. You could hire someone to translate(maybe AI?), but it would present many opportunities to get screwed without firsthand knowledge.
Teaching Cons:
It takes a lot of time that could be spent on more valuable knowledge.
It frustrates kids for something they have no need to perform themselves, though they may need to read it from others on increasingly rare occasions.
Teaching Uncertainties:
Not knowing Latin is also a "soft" illiteracy, and it doesn't matter much to most people. Is cursive on the way to becoming Latin or runes?
Maybe it promotes art or a different way of thinking? No idea, but I could see it providing non obvious value. Maybe it's been studied?
Teaching Pros:
There's still a lot of places cursive writing could be run into, and it would be good(and sometimes necessary for people to be able to understand)
If one doesn't know cursive, it would be a kind of soft illiteracy. You could hire someone to translate(maybe AI?), but it would present many opportunities to get screwed without firsthand knowledge.
Teaching Cons:
It takes a lot of time that could be spent on more valuable knowledge.
It frustrates kids for something they have no need to perform themselves, though they may need to read it from others on increasingly rare occasions.
Teaching Uncertainties:
Not knowing Latin is also a "soft" illiteracy, and it doesn't matter much to most people. Is cursive on the way to becoming Latin or runes?
Maybe it promotes art or a different way of thinking? No idea, but I could see it providing non obvious value. Maybe it's been studied?