Perfect Trump candidate. Greenie approved
birds of a feather...
do sexual assault together
Perfect Trump candidate. Greenie approved
That’s a weird thing to be upset about. ☝️
Everyone else is getting on you for the absurdity in your post.That's it? That's all you've got? You're going to beat that dead horse till you've flayed the hide off of it, and it still isn't going to get up and run. Just fyi, the majority of the nation either thinks that lawsuit was bullshit, or that a sexual assaulter is a better choice to run the nation than a democrat. Pick the one that helps you sleep at night.
I think your declaration here makes eminent sense. Look at what he said:No, actually there is a third option and one that explains most of your posts; they have been brainwashed by right wing media, social media, or have simply not been paying attention and have no idea what’s fact and what isn’t.
In order for those two choices to be offered up as alternative choices to offer there needs to be a sense that the ideas expressed are the factually valid alternatives. He is saying that he rejects the idea he voted for a rapist because he voted for a person to was witch hunted. He is hiding the fact that he voted for a sexual assaulter who was convicted of that but that doesn’t make Trump a real rapist because the trial was politically motivated by people only to disqualify him as electable and his actual politics being great, makes that unfair.Just fyi, the majority of the nation either thinks that lawsuit was bullshit, or that a sexual assaulter is a better choice to run the nation than a democrat. Pick the one that helps you sleep at night.
You make me smile with delight.He's still in "defend the indefensible" mode. A form of PTSD that Trump's followers get after 8 years of defending Trump's inexcusable criminal behavior.
And I'm starting to like the guy so I'm sure I'm undeservedly getting a case of Stockholm Syndrome from having to defend Greenie's weird behavior all the time.
Personally I believe that the kind of gloating satisfaction expressed in our side won becoming most people see truth we do arises out of a desire to get even for being put down as worthless, or as liberals are wont to describe conservative, deplorables.Everyone else is getting on you for the absurdity in your post.
I'm just here to point out that your statement about the majority of the country is objectively incorrect. Even if you only count the people who only cast votes and not the number of registered voters nor the number of eligible voters, his count is still under 50%.
And considering we just went through the highest inflation since the 70s, the Democrats had a minority woman for a candidate who didn't go through the primary process, and the amount of misinformation and ignorance out there, that should scream to you how bad a candidate Trump was. A good candidate and the Republicans might have had a Reagan-level election under these circumstances.
Then they might have had an actual mandate from the American people. But no one has a mandate with <50% of the votes.
Had it been a criminal trial you'd have a point, it wasn't.I think your declaration here makes eminent sense. Look at what he said:
“
In order for those two choices to be offered up as alternative choices to offer there needs to be a sense that the ideas expressed are the factually valid alternatives. He is saying that he rejects the idea he voted for a rapist because he voted for a person to was witch hunted. He is hiding the fact that he voted for a sexual assaulter who was convicted of that but that doesn’t make Trump a real rapist because the trial was politically motivated by people only to disqualify him as electable and his actual politics being great, makes that unfair.
There is no sense that even if the trial was politically motivated and brought by political enemies, does nothing to change the objective verdict rendered. Trump violently assaulted a woman and his political views are more important to them than punishing the crimes of rapists.
So how can a person wind up so morally twisted as to put a politician above his crimes?
It’s in my opinion the usual reasons. Children raised to conform to the cultural madness of their surroundings by threat of being outcast, which no child can survive, choose to capitulate at a tremendous psychological price. They have to take up the burden of guilt and shame that authoritarianism always brings, that leaving the herd mentality is a mortal sin, something that even thinking about will bring back the fear of that early terror.
Authoritarian culture creates perverse pleasure. A person robbed of the opportunity to experience the universe guilt free and with a real sense of self will find alternative sources of pleasures and fantasized imaginings like the feelings of entitlement to sex on demand.
Authoritarianism brings many and varied forms of predators and psychological manipulators that insure the the herd stays loyal so it can be milked and here too will be where the best money and debauchery exists.
Just keep the herd in a constant state of agitation and tell them how to think. Of course a rapist is better than a democrat. Liberals just didn’t swallow authoritarianism hook line and sinker. They went off the reservation and refused to ‘properly’ redirect their hatred at the rule breakers. They wondered away into dam nation that will happen to those who resist not seeing in themselves those same feelings all victims of the same childhood disease.
Those who face psychological intimidation have two choices, fight or acquiesce but it’s just opposite sides of the same disease, mental states that a few children who escaped the the normative missed out on. Here and there too some will reintegrate and escape the invisible prison most of us live in.
How do those who are blind regain sight that was taken. Who would ask a question without some sort of haunting wondering about one’s condition? Anybody haunted?
You make me smile with delight.
Just a thought, since you are so undeserving, doesn’t everywhere you look, 👀 look to be up?
Whatever makes you sleep at night…Had it been a criminal trial you'd have a point, it wasn't.
Had it been a criminal trial you'd have a point, it wasn't.
The sound you hear is the goal posts breaking the speed of sound as the rush by.Do you think OJ Simpson is a murderer?
The sound you hear is the goal posts breaking the speed of sound as the rush by.
Had it been a criminal trial you'd have a point, it wasn't.
He was convicted of 34 felonies in a criminal trial and you still voted for him.Had it been a criminal trial you'd have a point, it wasn't.
So looks like the number of women is up to 27
What was the total number of sexual assault allegations from both Kamala and walz? Oh yea. Zero
Yeah, but there hasn't been a criminal trial with forensic evidence and video footage with Trump saying to the camera that he is doing the exact crime which he is guilty of, so can we really know the truth or form an opinion?So looks like the number of women is up to 27
What was the total number of sexual assault allegations from both Kamala and walz? Oh yea. Zero
Yeah, but there hasn't been a criminal trial with forensic evidence and video footage with Trump saying to the camera that he is doing the exact crime which he is guilty of, so can we really know the truth or form an opinion?
What you are saying is that if an act of rape is brought to the attention of the authorities after the statue of limitations expire leaving only civil charges available, a conviction on those civil charges based on a jury finding they did occur, means that at the time the rape was criminally chargeable you get to consider him not guilty of being a criminal them. Anybody not profoundly interested in denial they voted for a criminal rapist on that basis would see the deceptive self denial of moral judgment required to maintain face.Had it been a criminal trial you'd have a point, it wasn't.
Have you seen a poll on partisan subjects?Cool, so...
....
Detail how this is a left leaning forum.