Just like Mali, that's the issue. Adreno wins since is open in that matter.Xclipse is very competitive it just lack custom drivers, even Midrange like Exynos 1480 can run many switch games.
No Mali is far behind Xclipse, and even Adreno which don't have custom drivers tend to lag behind Xclipse,Just like Mali, that's the issue. Adreno wins since is open in that matter.
Interesting:No Mali is far behind Xclipse, and even Adreno which don't have custom drivers tend to lag behind Xclipse,
this is red dead redemption running on Exynos 1480
This is red dead redemption running on D1200
This is same game running in snapdragon 7+ gen 2
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6P1Jhc8-vd4
As you can see there E1480 manage to match much faster sd 7+ gen 2 and completely destroyed D1200 even though D1200 has slightly faster Gpu.
Not sure about the authenticity of this rumour (OP doesn't name a source).Dimensity 9500
2x Cortex X930 @ ~4 GHz.
6x Cortex A730 @ ~3.5 GHz.
TSMC N3P.
Dimensity 9400
1x Cortex X925 (2 MB L2) @ 3.6 GHz.
3x Cortex X4 (1 MB L2) @ 3.3 GHz.
4x Cortex A720 (512 KB L2) @ 2.4 GHz.
TSMC N3E.
Dimensity 9300
1x Cortex X4 (1 MB L2) @ 3.25 GHz.
3x Cortex X4 (512 KB L2) @ 2.8 GHz.
4x Cortex A720 (256 KB L2) @ 2.0 GHz.
TSMC N4P.
Cache sizes of 9500 CPU are unknown, but it can be expected to be similar or higher than 9400.
What is immediately noticeable is that 9500 changes to a 2+6 design from the 1+3+4 design of 9400. You might think they are simply copying the 2+6 design introduced by 8 Elite, but the reasons are quite sophisticated.
Cortex X930 and A730 are ARMv9.4 cores. So they cannot mixed and match with ARMv9.2 cores (X925, X4, A725, A720). Dimensity 9500 will also adopt SME, which necessitates that all the cores in the CPU should be of the X930/A730/A530 generation.
If Mediatek was to keep using the 1+3+4 design, they'll have to use 4 X930 cores and 4 A730 cores. X930 is huge (12 wide decoder), has high licensing cost, and it consumes a ton of power. So having 4 X930 cores in a smartphone SoC is unsustainable. This is why Mediatek opted for a 2+6 design.
Having 6 A730 cores is great for power efficiency (at the lower section of the curve), because they have less leakage than Cortex X cores. You can see this in Geekerwan's video on 8400, where it has even better power efficiency than 9400 and 8 Elite at the lower section of the power curve, thanks to the 8 A725 cores.
What will the final performance of 9500 CPU look like? It is difficult to estimate the multi-core, but we can expect the single-core to reach about 4000 points in Geekbench 6, which is 33% higher than 9400 (+10% IPC, +10% clock, +10% SME).
What do you mean? It beats 8 Gen 2 in multi-core workload. Single-core could be a bit better.Redmi Turbo 4 has issues with the performance on all cores...
Redmi Turbo 4 with Dimensity 8400 on Geekbench: How does it fare against Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, 8 Gen 2? - Gizmochina
MediaTek recently unveiled the Dimensity 8400 chipset, which is the first-ever chip in its segment. The new chip will drive the Redmi Turbo 4 and Realme Neo 7 SE, which are expected to launch in January 2025 in China. The Poco X7 Pro heading to the global market will also have the new chip, as […]www.gizmochina.com
View attachment 113810
Means it doesn't match MTK slides. 0.89xWhat do you mean? It beats 8 Gen 2 in multi-core workload. Single-core could be a bit better.
Has MediaTek made any official claims about the performance in Geekbench? I haven't seen any.Means it doesn't match MTK slides. 0.89x
Yeah, if you go back a few pages there is a slide showing GB6 MT to about 6800. But this phone must be a lower bin or lower power limit.Has MediaTek made any official claims about the performance in Geekbench? I haven't seen any.
This one I guess:Yeah, if you go back a few pages there is a slide showing GB6 MT to about 6800. But this phone must be a lower bin or lower power limit.
That reddit post has since been deleted, but DCS corroborates the info mentioned in it:Rumour:
Mediatek Dimensity 9500 will adopt 2+6 CPU (Cortex X930 + Cortex A730), and use TSMC N3P process
Not sure about the authenticity of this rumour (OP doesn't name a source).
So, Nvidia made the decision to call the CPU “Grace” even though it is a separate, joint with Mediatek design with different cores and a reduced memory interface. They are getting people excited thinking they are getting what the enterprise buyers are getting.
Naming is almost like Blackwell I think. As I understand the two different Blackwell lines are not very similar. Do they even have the same ISA? I guess there are two lines in the Grace family now.So, Nvidia made the decision to call the CPU “Grace” even though it is a separate, joint with Mediatek design with different cores and a reduced memory interface. They are getting people excited thinking they are getting what the enterprise buyers are getting.
There is going to be a rude awakening when the details are revealed. But the beauty of being so far ahead of the competition is Nvidia can abuse people’s hopes and aspirations. Many will be outraged at being misled, but then still buy it.