Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads

Page 729 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
718
670
106






As Hot Chips 34 starting this week, Intel will unveil technical information of upcoming Meteor Lake (MTL) and Arrow Lake (ARL), new generation platform after Raptor Lake. Both MTL and ARL represent new direction which Intel will move to multiple chiplets and combine as one SoC platform.

MTL also represents new compute tile that based on Intel 4 process which is based on EUV lithography, a first from Intel. Intel expects to ship MTL mobile SoC in 2023.

ARL will come after MTL so Intel should be shipping it in 2024, that is what Intel roadmap is telling us. ARL compute tile will be manufactured by Intel 20A process, a first from Intel to use GAA transistors called RibbonFET.



Comparison of upcoming Intel's U-series CPU: Core Ultra 100U, Lunar Lake and Panther Lake

ModelCode-NameDateTDPNodeTilesMain TileCPULP E-CoreLLCGPUXe-cores
Core Ultra 100UMeteor LakeQ4 202315 - 57 WIntel 4 + N5 + N64tCPU2P + 8E212 MBIntel Graphics4
?Lunar LakeQ4 202417 - 30 WN3B + N62CPU + GPU & IMC4P + 4E012 MBArc8
?Panther LakeQ1 2026 ??Intel 18A + N3E3CPU + MC4P + 8E4?Arc12



Comparison of die size of Each Tile of Meteor Lake, Arrow Lake, Lunar Lake and Panther Lake

Meteor LakeArrow Lake (N3B)Lunar LakePanther Lake
PlatformMobile H/U OnlyDesktop & Mobile H&HXMobile U OnlyMobile H
Process NodeIntel 4TSMC N3BTSMC N3BIntel 18A
DateQ4 2023Desktop-Q4-2024
H&HX-Q1-2025
Q4 2024Q1 2026 ?
Full Die6P + 8P8P + 16E4P + 4E4P + 8E
LLC24 MB36 MB ?12 MB?
tCPU66.48
tGPU44.45
SoC96.77
IOE44.45
Total252.15



Intel Core Ultra 100 - Meteor Lake



As mentioned by Tomshardware, TSMC will manufacture the I/O, SoC, and GPU tiles. That means Intel will manufacture only the CPU and Foveros tiles. (Notably, Intel calls the I/O tile an 'I/O Expander,' hence the IOE moniker.)



 

Attachments

  • PantherLake.png
    283.5 KB · Views: 24,020
  • LNL.png
    881.8 KB · Views: 25,510
Last edited:
Jul 27, 2020
23,571
16,556
146
I personally think that with APO and driver binaries specially compiled for Lion Cove/Skymont, the driver overhead won't be that much of an issue and this is what Intel cares about really. To sell this combination to OEMs by the thousands or millions. They don't give a crap about how good or bad it works on existing hardware and that would be expected given their limited software development resources. They gotta do triage and optimize for the future which is where the most money lies. I'm guessing the current BM shortage is also related to fulfilling huge B580/B570 orders for the big three (Dell, HP, Lenovo).
 

511

Golden Member
Jul 12, 2024
1,746
1,604
106
I personally think that with APO and driver binaries specially compiled for Lion Cove/Skymont, the driver overhead won't be that much of an issue and this is what Intel cares about really. To sell this combination to OEMs by the thousands or millions. They don't give a crap about how good or bad it works on existing hardware and that would be expected given their limited software development resources. They gotta do triage and optimize for the future which is where the most money lies. I'm guessing the current BM shortage is also related to fulfilling huge B580/B570 orders for the big three (Dell, HP, Lenovo).
Not just LNC/SKT GLC/GMT as well and for the driver overhead it will be sorted out if it's a software fix or keep broken if it's a HW flaw
 

gaav87

Senior member
Apr 27, 2024
650
1,267
96
Anyone remember this setting ?
Maximum pre-rendered frames.
Maybe it's the culprit. like in the rtx1000-2000 days and even rx5000 series.
I remember setting this for overwatch in 2016 and it reduced cpu bottleneck by, A LOT
 

Gideon

Golden Member
Nov 27, 2007
1,986
4,914
136
Actually they also tested it with Ryzen 2000 series which shows a heavy drop. Thats clearly not recommended by the manufacturer.

Just stop spreading fud. Yeah they also tested with Ryzen 2000 among others, but just look at this chart, will you:



Just look at this chart. Are you seriously claiming this is a "nothingburger" and the only issue here is HWUB's integrity?
Hardware Unboxed just wants to sensationalize something which is clearly misleading.

Dropping below 4060 even with a Ryzen 7600 is a huge issue, totally worth mentioning. But surely noone is ever gonna pair this 250$ GPU with a mid/low range CPU right?
 
Last edited:

AcrosTinus

Member
Jun 23, 2024
171
170
76
Just stop spreading fud. Yeah they also tested with Ryzen 2000 among others, but just look at this chart, will you:



Just look at this chart. Are you seriously claiming this is a "nothingburger" and the only issue here is HWUB's integrity?


Dropping below 4060 even with a Ryzen 7600 is a huge issue, totally worth mentioning. But surely noone is ever gonna pair this 250$ GPU with a mid/low range CPU right?
It is though, I know no one in my group that is eyeing a ARC card. Some are but for media encoding reasons or video editing due to the superior media engines. This performance has been on the market for years at a lower price with a 8GB RAM limitation.
For the money try shooting a used 3080 for a little more and you will be served for years as a casual.
 
Last edited:

coercitiv

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2014
7,083
16,341
136
Since folsk are joking around about Raja, I'll afford a technically off-topic post myself. Asianometry recently published a very condensed and informative video recap of Intel's rise in the industry. I highly recommend it for anyone interested in a bird's eye view of Intel's history and modus operandi during the glory days.

 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
3,383
4,626
106
Since folsk are joking around about Raja, I'll afford a technically off-topic post myself. Asianometry recently published a very condensed and informative video recap of Intel's rise in the industry. I highly recommend it for anyone interested in a bird's eye view of Intel's history and modus operandi during the glory days.

Intel at its peak was from 2006-2012.

No one I mean no one could beat them, the only ones that could destroy Intel were themselves…
 
Reactions: Tlh97 and OneEng2

511

Golden Member
Jul 12, 2024
1,746
1,604
106
Since folsk are joking around about Raja, I'll afford a technically off-topic post myself. Asianometry recently published a very condensed and informative video recap of Intel's rise in the industry. I highly recommend it for anyone interested in a bird's eye view of Intel's history and modus operandi during the glory days.

This Intel was something that striked fear in the heart of Even Huang it is never coming back
 

511

Golden Member
Jul 12, 2024
1,746
1,604
106
Mission accomplished.
All the heavy lifting was done by Brian kranzich and bunch of other dudes company destroyed and Brain rotted from the most innovative company to most brain rotted one.
And the dudes left after mission accomplished
 
Last edited:

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,061
3,542
136
Not true.

Broadwell Core i7-5775C

So he did just one good thing and then screwed the pooch by not continuing it or improving upon it.
That part in reality didn't register as far as sales. By and large Broadwell was mobile only because Intel couldn't get 14nm clocks up to desktop levels from Haswell.

Broadwell and 14nm was the beginning of Intel's long slide into the abyss.
 

511

Golden Member
Jul 12, 2024
1,746
1,604
106
Not true.

Broadwell Core i7-5775C

So he did just one good thing and then screwed the pooch by not continuing it or improving upon it.
14nm delayed by 6 month 10nm was delayed for like 4 years getting Quad Cores in his reign near to the end even a broken clock is right twice lmao and he even missed it he literally has more failures to his name than any other
 

LightningZ71

Platinum Member
Mar 10, 2017
2,079
2,529
136
Jut continuing the 5775C into the 6th generation could have given them quite an innovative product. I think that the biggest hurdle would have been their own pricing strategy. They would have charged more for that product than anormal 6th gen i7+ low end videocard, thus killing any value proposition it had against the alternative's performance.

The only place that it would have gotten traction would have been with Apple.
 
Reactions: Tlh97 and 511
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |