I don't have any answers, just questions. The biggest question is why anyone wouldn't want this looked at. If the system isn't working correctly it should be fixed, if it is working correctly and not producing errors then we move on.
The primary problem here seems to be that it's Musk looking into it.
Have you looked into this like at all? Also as hard as it may be to understand we do not seek to fix every single error in data or applications. Issues are evaluated based on their impact, risk of something really bad happening, and finally the cost to remedy the issue. Most applications of any kind of complexity have a constant backlog of identified bugs waiting to be repaired that are not because they are not that critical.I don't have any answers, just questions. The biggest question is why anyone wouldn't want this looked at. If the system isn't working correctly it should be fixed, if it is working correctly and not producing errors then we move on.
The primary problem here seems to be that it's Musk looking into it.
Have you looked into this like at all? Also as hard as it may be to understand we do not seek to fix every single error in data or applications. Issues are evaluated based on their impact, risk of something really bad happening, and finally the cost to remedy the issue. Most applications of any kind of complexity have a constant backlog of identified bugs waiting to be repaired that are not because they are not that critical.
I don't have any answers, just questions. The biggest question is why anyone wouldn't want this looked at. If the system isn't working correctly it should be fixed, if it is working correctly and not producing errors then we move on.
The primary problem here seems to be that it's Musk looking into it.
You are pathetic, pathetically transparent, and a coward. The primary problem is that this is unconstitutional.I don't have any answers, just questions. The biggest question is why anyone wouldn't want this looked at. If the system isn't working correctly it should be fixed, if it is working correctly and not producing errors then we move on.
The primary problem here seems to be that it's Musk looking into it.
I thought you are an adult when you turn 18 in USA? How can you have a 16 year old in that position?DOGE Math Error Results in Claim That Musk has 13 Billion Children Instead of 13
“Okay, so we were off by a few billion kids,” the 16-year-old deputy head of DOGE said.www.borowitzreport.com
I don't have any answers, just questions. The biggest question is why anyone wouldn't want this looked at. If the system isn't working correctly it should be fixed, if it is working correctly and not producing errors then we move on.
The primary problem here seems to be that it's Musk looking into it.
Pretty sure the borowitz report is satire.I thought you are an adult when you turn 18 in USA? How can you have a 16 year old in that position?
In some states it's 19 or 21. Mostly the stupid ones (Alabama, Nebraska, Mississippi)I thought you are an adult when you turn 18 in USA? How can you have a 16 year old in that position?
Because there's never been an indication that something isn't working as expected until a billionaire said it wasn't.I don't have any answers, just questions. The biggest question is why anyone wouldn't want this looked at. If the system isn't working correctly it should be fixed, if it is working correctly and not producing errors then we move on.
The primary problem here seems to be that it's Musk looking into it.
I always love it when you guys came around to my contractor's office and tried to start putting stickers on them. Those are not you government property!Because there's never been an indication that something isn't working as expected until a billionaire said it wasn't.
Let me go through another exercise. In the military we did quarterly IT audits. A handful of FNG's would walk around building to building and physically inspect every single thing with a service tag or SN on it, as well as a bunch of stuff that didn't have it but got labels placed on it. It was cross-referenced to a spreadsheet and if anything was missing or 'appeared', someone's job was to track down the 5w's on it.
We'd do this for a few thousand devices, every quarter. It worked really well.
Now it would be really easy to question this method and the results, despite the fact it already goes above and beyond what most orgs would bother with. How do you know the FNGs were doing their job? How do you know they didn't transpose letters and fuck up inventory? How do you know there wasn't ghost equipment stored above the ceiling when they showed up? etc etc etc. You can't track down all of that but that still doesn't mean you aren't going above and beyond to do the job required, to support the mission you've been tasked to do.
I don't fucking know, nor care, why some dates associated with age columns in a half-century old DB are showing values that don't make sense (cuz it's not my forte), and I sure as shit don't want a billionaire to decide how that should be changed, in the same way I wouldn't want elon fucking musk deciding how the military unit I was a part of did internal physical asset inventorying, cuz that's not his forte either.
Why pretend indeed. Your exorbitant repeated use of the square one fallacy is the telltale sign of a blind devout follower of a cult. A mind lost to madness.So the issue shouldn't be looked at for reason X? Verifying the code issue should be easy enough, create a fake entry and see what happens.
I would also assume that generating a list of payments to those particular people would be a simple process as well.
Why pretend that the entire system has to be shut down to verify the integrity of it?
What's funny/sad is that he's been repeatedly and humiliatingly shown to have no idea what he's talking about and all these scandals he's uncovering are bullshit. Instead of losing his credibility though he just keeps making up more lies that conservatives demand be disproven.Why pretend indeed. Your exorbitant repeated use of the square one fallacy is the telltale sign of a blind devout follower of a cult. A mind lost to madness.
When Elon fails to follow up and actually prove any of his BS, when he just goes radio silent on the supposed 17 million "people" over the age of 100.
Will you demand he prove his claims?
Will you admit his evil intention, the lying and the deceit?
Will you admit Trump and Elon's felonious propaganda aimed at stirring the masses with mass delusion, irrational fears and hatred?
I expect there will be absolutely zero follow up and zero evidence to support any of Elon's claims.
I expect you will not demand a damn thing from them.
I expect you will still worship at the altar of evil.
Remember this is Borowitz. 🤪I thought you are an adult when you turn 18 in USA? How can you have a 16 year old in that position?
I think they could also be both liars and dumb fucksI posted a brief article on Tuesday, but dudes like Greenman don't care about the facts.
There was an SSA IG report as recently as July 2023. Basically, there is old data for Americans that has not been corrected in the database. According to the report, 98% of these ages 100+ receive no payments.
Leon's team jumped in, found millions of records and decided to make the claim that a lot of these dead people are receiving SS checks. Either they're lying or are dumb fucks; take your pick. (The tenor of this article is "fair and balanced" BS but ignore that. Also separate reporting by The NYT.)
Here is the real data from Prof. Wolfers that was referenced:
Hey Ukraine, if you are listening....Elon Musk's Jet Tracker is now on Bluesky
Elon Musk's Jet Tracking (@elonjet.net)
ElonJet | Tracking Elon Musk’s Jet by @jacks.grndcntrl.netbsky.app
Fuck you are dumb. Unless you visit the code you have no way of knowing what those fields are used for... odds are the alive field is not in use anymore, technical debt per se. Instead of pointing to an sql extract of personal data show that money were actually paid out.
But Elon is on crack cocaine. So you get shit.
Dumb is someone who isn't capable of a conversation without using useless, filler vulgarity. Musk, as an adviser, had a team of computer specialists look at the data. Nothing more. The data found what it found. Since their mission is to peel back the onion , should the discrepancies not be looked into? A far right {Sarc) outlet, NPR reported on similar discrepancies over 10 years ago yet here we still are. Now we should find out how or if the money was paid out. The What personal data? None.
Another far right (sarc) outlet. Should we look deeper and find out if therre is more? Apparently not. Thank you Elon! The most successful man on the planet.
US recovers $31 million in federal payments to dead people
Ever since the U.S. Social Security Administration opened its books to the Department of the Treasury’s Bureau of Fiscal Service, it has been able to stop and recover more than $31 million in improper federal payments to dead people.apnews.com
I guess you’re just free to pretend multiple inspector generals didn’t look into this and also ignore the controls on payments that already exist.Dumb is someone who isn't capable of a conversation without using useless, filler vulgarity. Musk, as an adviser, had a team of computer specialists look at the data. Nothing more. The data found what it found. Since their mission is to peel back the onion , should the discrepancies not be looked into? A far right {Sarc) outlet, NPR reported on similar discrepancies over 10 years ago yet here we still are. Now we should find out how or if the money was paid out. The What personal data? None.
Another far right (sarc) outlet. Should we look deeper and find out if therre is more? Apparently not. Thank you Elon! The most successful man on the planet.
US recovers $31 million in federal payments to dead people
Ever since the U.S. Social Security Administration opened its books to the Department of the Treasury’s Bureau of Fiscal Service, it has been able to stop and recover more than $31 million in improper federal payments to dead people.apnews.com