Newsom breaks with Progressives on transgenders in athletics….

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,909
6,567
126

This is an issue that in my opinion probably affects a very small number of athletes nationally but can be played by Republicans to turn off so many potential voters because, at least for me and I think many many others allowing women who can be thought of as born genetically men just plain gives them a natural advantage physically. Whether it does or does not I can’t see any way to disavow that suspicion that of a feeling level and that is the level at which people vote.

I have no use for Newsom personally, I see him as a pretty boy whose main appeal is physical rather than having a moral core more like I see in B Sanders, but I agree with his stance here.

I have a very different view of politics than what passes for Progressive these days which I would maybe call irrationally emotionally attached to stupid ideas that the one here and if you challenge them over they melt down emotionally like two year olds throwing tantrums.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,968
8,634
136
XX, XY, Co-Ed.

For the people with extra Xs and Ys, go Co-Ed.

As much as I don't give a shit about sports, I also don't want to have any extra servings of fascism so that 0.00001% of the population can pick which genetic sports league they get to play in. Are we trying to win elections or what?
 

Zor Prime

Golden Member
Nov 7, 1999
1,037
604
136
Newsom would like to win elections. I'm in CA more often than I'm not. I saw 0 Harris signs leading up to the election and I saw a shit-ton of Trump signs in the valley. By and large the Mexicans here, and they're everywhere, have no love of former dudes beating up on women in sports no matter what their political bias is otherwise. It's a hot topic thanks to the Republicans and one that can no longer be ignored or ridiculed -- it's become relevant like it or not. Inclusiveness of trans people in sports is a hill to die on and Democrats are dying by the droves and Newsom evidently recognizes this. So yeah this shit affects a sub-percentage of the population yet probably 90% + of everybody has an opinion about it and are emotionally invested.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
34,782
8,886
136
In general I agree with the notion...
However, in practice they will just attack someone on the next rung of the hate and bigotry ladder. Such as LGB or POC. Then making slaves out of Women, Taliban style. After that it'll be back to dividing up Whites over WHERE they were born. How they speak, how they look. If they are always 100% loyal or not.

Ask Amy Coney Barrett how loyal MAGA is to their own people.
Theirs is a raw seething hatred that will only end when they meet their end.
You can try appealing to the fabled independent with this... just don't expect MAGA to care one bit.
 
Reactions: GodisanAtheist

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
36,839
31,893
136
If someone can give me a compelling reason why someone born as a male should be allowed to compete as a female I'm willing to listen. As for extra Xs and Ys it gets more complicated I'm sure but if doctors think you're a female at birth I think they should be okay to compete as a female even if they are genetically more athletic.

Here's the thing though, how many Democrats have come out in support of trans females in female sports? This is yet another issue that stinks of "shit people say on social media is being portrayed as the default position of all Democrats despite very few, if any, actual politicians even weighing in on the topic."
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,120
16,323
136
What it is, is another Democrat falling for faux outrage. The smart solution is to let the individual sports and their governing body handle it.

I’m hoping newsom doesn’t run, his actions always seem calculated.
 
Last edited:

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,847
2,657
136
If someone can give me a compelling reason why someone born as a male should be allowed to compete as a female I'm willing to listen. As for extra Xs and Ys it gets more complicated I'm sure but if doctors think you're a female at birth I think they should be okay to compete as a female even if they are genetically more athletic.

Here's the thing though, how many Democrats have come out in support of trans females in female sports? This is yet another issue that stinks of "shit people say on social media is being portrayed as the default position of all Democrats despite very few, if any, actual politicians even weighing in on the topic."
Because in anything other than the most extreme circumstances this is just a trans kid, who's already having an incredibly difficult time in life, wanting to play their favorite sport. These aren't fully grown, fully developed men pretending to be women in order to dominate a sport. If that were the case where are the widespread examples of this happening? Who gives a fuck if some trans girl wants to play JV soccer or volleyball or whatever, especially if they're on blockers or hormones.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
28,828
28,736
136
Newsom clearly has eye's on the 28 election, and appears to be distancing himself from the far left. Presenting himself as a left leaning moderate is a sound move.
Allowing individual sports to figure out what works for them is “far left”.


Just a sign of how far right the country really is.
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,847
2,657
136
Newsom clearly has eye's on the 28 election, and appears to be distancing himself from the far left. Presenting himself as a left leaning moderate is a sound move.
Should this person play in a male or female league?

 
Reactions: Fenixgoon
Dec 10, 2005
27,129
11,212
136
Because in anything other than the most extreme circumstances this is just a trans kid, who's already having an incredibly difficult time in life, wanting to play their favorite sport. These aren't fully grown, fully developed men pretending to be women in order to dominate a sport. If that were the case where are the widespread examples of this happening? Who gives a fuck if some trans girl wants to play JV soccer or volleyball or whatever, especially if they're on blockers or hormones.
Its hard to believe that the premier issue of our time is a question of if we should inspect children's genitals. And that children who happen to be trans may want to play in the sport with the gender they identify with - a problem so small that it's hard to believe that both the Federal and State governments are expending so much time and energy on it. Apparently, all our other big problems are solved. Who knew?

Anyway, Gavin Newsom can go play in traffic. Throwing people under the bus for political expediency is gross, and it's not going to stop at trans rights. The right-wing kooks will just move onto the next target.
 

nOOky

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2004
3,171
2,197
136
XX, XY, Co-Ed.

For the people with extra Xs and Ys, go Co-Ed.

As much as I don't give a shit about sports, I also don't want to have any extra servings of fascism so that 0.00001% of the population can pick which genetic sports league they get to play in. Are we trying to win elections or what?

Those saying let the individual leagues or associations decide disagree with you. In that vein the right wingers will continue to use the issue as a wedge and it's incredibly powerful with the average MAGA voter. If the left wants to win elections they have to stop pandering to the .0001% because not only does it not win elections, it probably helped lose the last one. I'm fairly liberal and I hate seeing a guy win in womens sports. I'm sorry, but as such a small minority the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Get that shit through your thick heads unless you like sitting on the outside whining about how the country is losing because you care about literally 13 transgender athletes feelings across the country. The US won't be there in our lifetimes, we need to pick battles we can actually win.
 
Reactions: jmagg

Pipeline 1010

Golden Member
Dec 2, 2005
1,968
788
136
Here's the thing though, how many Democrats have come out in support of trans females in female sports? This is yet another issue that stinks of "shit people say on social media is being portrayed as the default position of all Democrats despite very few, if any, actual politicians even weighing in on the topic."

This is where I don't understand why the Democrats never just clearly expressed something like: "yes we agree with Republicans that men shouldn't be in women's sports. Now lets discuss important things that we disagree about". Everyone is so afraid to appear as if they agree with the other team.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
32,750
11,955
136
Those saying let the individual leagues or associations decide disagree with you. In that vein the right wingers will continue to use the issue as a wedge and it's incredibly powerful with the average MAGA voter. If the left wants to win elections they have to stop pandering to the .0001% because not only does it not win elections, it probably helped lose the last one. I'm fairly liberal and I hate seeing a guy win in womens sports. I'm sorry, but as such a small minority the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Get that shit through your thick heads unless you like sitting on the outside whining about how the country is losing because you care about literally 13 transgender athletes feelings across the country. The US won't be there in our lifetimes, we need to pick battles we can actually win.
Disagree. The responses need to be reframed.

Why are Republicans so obsessed with someone's chromosomes and genitalia?

Start asking them to inspect the genitals of everyone in the room so they know they can comfortably use the bathroom without issue.


And then move on to the next topic
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,847
2,657
136
Those saying let the individual leagues or associations decide disagree with you. In that vein the right wingers will continue to use the issue as a wedge and it's incredibly powerful with the average MAGA voter. If the left wants to win elections they have to stop pandering to the .0001% because not only does it not win elections, it probably helped lose the last one. I'm fairly liberal and I hate seeing a guy win in womens sports. I'm sorry, but as such a small minority the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Get that shit through your thick heads unless you like sitting on the outside whining about how the country is losing because you care about literally 13 transgender athletes feelings across the country. The US won't be there in our lifetimes, we need to pick battles we can actually win.
It's not the left obsessing over it and making it an issue, it's the right.
 
Dec 10, 2005
27,129
11,212
136
Disagree. The responses need to be reframed.

Why are Republicans so obsessed with someone's chromosomes and genitalia?

Start asking them to inspect the genitals of everyone in the room so they know they can comfortably use the bathroom without issue.


And then move on to the next topic
Yes. People have to stop buying into conservative framing, as if they were ever being genuine in the first place.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,712
17,253
136
I agree it is simply not worth losing elections to satisfy a fraction of a fraction of a tiny fraction of the electorate. National Government doesn’t need to be involved in this issue.
I wish I could find the video, leading up to the election there was a news show with 5 or 6 Democratic strategists (no politicians) and one mentioned this topic which was basically he shouldn’t see his daughter being run over by a player who is substantially larger than her and was a boy a few years ago.
The panel went absolutely off the rails about that comment.
It was a wonderful summary about how a small topic can derail everything.
I don’t know much about Newsrom however he has the killer instinct and wants to win plus in his own works he wants to “get shit done”.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
21,590
6,037
136
I agree it is simply not worth losing elections to satisfy a fraction of a fraction of a tiny fraction of the electorate. National Government doesn’t need to be involved in this issue.
I wish I could find the video, leading up to the election there was a news show with 5 or 6 Democratic strategists (no politicians) and one mentioned this topic which was basically he shouldn’t see his daughter being run over by a player who is substantially larger than her and was a boy a few years ago.
The panel went absolutely off the rails about that comment.
It was a wonderful summary about how a small topic can derail everything.
I don’t know much about Newsrom however he has the killer instinct and wants to win plus in his own works he wants to “get shit done”.
It's a "piss them off issue", there is no upside to promoting it other than making republican's angry, and cheating women out of victory's they rightfully won.
 
Reactions: pcgeek11

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,968
8,634
136
Those saying let the individual leagues or associations decide disagree with you. In that vein the right wingers will continue to use the issue as a wedge and it's incredibly powerful with the average MAGA voter. If the left wants to win elections they have to stop pandering to the .0001% because not only does it not win elections, it probably helped lose the last one. I'm fairly liberal and I hate seeing a guy win in womens sports. I'm sorry, but as such a small minority the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Get that shit through your thick heads unless you like sitting on the outside whining about how the country is losing because you care about literally 13 transgender athletes feelings across the country. The US won't be there in our lifetimes, we need to pick battles we can actually win.
I honestly don't care, but if it helps pull a few non-voters and "weirded-out" voters, I'm for it. Let's get rid of the fascists first, then we can worry about sportsball.
 
Reactions: dank69

nOOky

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2004
3,171
2,197
136
It's not the left obsessing over it and making it an issue, it's the right.
Agree, but the first post about Newsome I was referring to was from the left, and here we are, mostly lefties I assume, rehashing it yet again.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |