Same as the syphilitic orange menace.Musk chimes in about more shit he knows nothing about. News at 11.
NATO is a money pit. The EU now has the resources to look after it's own defense, there is no reason for the U.S. to be involved any more.Except for the times we needed nato.
Amount of times nato needed us?
Elon Musk suggests the US should leave NATO, saying it 'doesn't make sense' for the US to pay for Europe's defense
Trump has repeatedly criticized Europe's defense spending and previously threatened to leave NATO if allies didn't pay more.www.yahoo.com
Newsflash: it's not only about defending Europe. It's about protecting our own interests and maintain our influence around the globe (both in Europe and by maintaining a forward presence). It's about getting people to buy from our weapons manufacturing industry.NATO is a money pit. The EU now has the resources to look after it's own defense, there is no reason for the U.S. to be involved any more.
Is Trump giving you daily blowjobs? No man can be this stupid without sex involved.NATO is a money pit. The EU now has the resources to look after it's own defense, there is no reason for the U.S. to be involved any more.
NATO is a money pit. The EU now has the resources to look after it's own defense, there is no reason for the U.S. to be involved any more.
You support closing our European bases, abandoning Nato standardization, abandon joint operations, intel, training and eliminating a key driver for other countries to buy from the United States?NATO is a money pit. The EU now has the resources to look after it's own defense, there is no reason for the U.S. to be involved any more.
Such a waste of excellent key strokes.You support closing our European bases, abandoning Nato standardization, abandon joint operations, intel, training and eliminating a key driver for other countries to buy from the United States?
Did it piss you off when the US declared article 5?
Does it bother you that there united states has relied on leveraging NATO for all of its military operations in the middle east?
Are you offended that NATO resource are effectively a force/capability expansion of the US military?
With reduced foriegn demand for our tech and support, do you propose increased taxation to keep the US defense industry afloat or should we begin shrinking it?
How do you propose staying on the bleeding edge of tech and doctrine without our nato partners and the global environment it creates?
Did you actually believe that NATO still exists because we are defending Europe?
Are you proposing a slashing of the US military and just return it to small defense force?
Defense from who?
Canada? Mexico?
Does it bother you that there united states has relied on leveraging NATO for all of its military operations in the middle east?
Your ignorance of history and NATO's past invoking of Article 5 is astounding.NATO is a money pit. The EU now has the resources to look after it's own defense, there is no reason for the U.S. to be involved any more.
dumdum like not gr0k all that.You support closing our European bases, abandoning Nato standardization, abandon joint operations, intel, training and eliminating a key driver for other countries to buy from the United States?
Did it piss you off when the US declared article 5?
Does it bother you that there united states has relied on leveraging NATO for all of its military operations in the middle east?
Are you offended that NATO resource are effectively a force/capability expansion of the US military?
With reduced foriegn demand for our tech and support, do you propose increased taxation to keep the US defense industry afloat or should we begin shrinking it?
How do you propose staying on the bleeding edge of tech and doctrine without our nato partners and the global environment it creates?
Did you actually believe that NATO still exists because we are defending Europe?
Are you proposing a slashing of the US military and just return it to small defense force?
Defense from who?
Canada? Mexico?
NATO is a money pit. The EU now has the resources to look after it's own defense, there is no reason for the U.S. to be involved any more.
You mean the one time it was invoked?Your ignorance of history and NATO's past invoking of Article 5 is astounding.
I know how it works, and I don't think we need to spend a trillion dollars a year on defense.Attempt to go more than one day without a ridiculous take: challenge failed
The US doesn't send bags of cash to NATO, dude.
And do you know why we spend so much and what we get out of it? We're not doing it out of the goodness of our hearts. It's power projection to ensure our access to foreign markets and have influence around the world. Other countries are not looking to have such world-wide influence, so they don't need to spend as much.You mean the one time it was invoked?
The U.S spends twice the total of every other member nation combined. Just under a trillion dollars. It's time to renegotiate that deal.
You mean the one time it was invoked?
The U.S spends twice the total of every other member nation combined. Just under a trillion dollars. It's time to renegotiate that deal.
Well, the first question you have to answer is "what do you want the US military to be able to do?"I know how it works, and I don't think we need to spend a trillion dollars a year on defense.
You've got more faith in him than I do.Greenman is getting desperate. His positions are increasingly dumb because he is having hiding the truth from himself. He will wake one day and he will realize he was the mark and a dumb one at that.
Enjoy your recession Greenman. May you get all the fruits it will yield.